绿色人工智能协助下的可持续城市规划和公共管理:随之而来的日本法律挑战

IF 2.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Transforming Government- People Process and Policy Pub Date : 2022-06-28 DOI:10.1108/tg-06-2021-0109
T. Matsuo, Shun Iwamitsu
{"title":"绿色人工智能协助下的可持续城市规划和公共管理:随之而来的日本法律挑战","authors":"T. Matsuo, Shun Iwamitsu","doi":"10.1108/tg-06-2021-0109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to present the legal conditions under which governments may use green artificial intelligence (AI) in city planning. Although Japan was one of the early countries to release its general AI principles, it has been relatively slow in establishing conditions where administrative agencies may use AI. Granted, there have been some recent scholarship that discusses the usage of AI in general under Japanese administrative law, but the use of green AI in city planning under Japanese law has not yet been discussed. Hence, this paper intends to focus on green AI in city planning and discuss the conditions for usage based on different categories of AI.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper conducts a legal analysis on the utilization of AI for the purpose of sustainable city planning and administration in Japan. The approach of this paper is to summarize the existing scholarship in Japanese administrative law and analyse the new elements in the new field of green AI in city planning. This paper is not a natural science paper. The social science method of jurisprudence is used. This paper cites only public sources, and no informal literature has been referenced.\n\n\nFindings\nThis paper establishes the conditions where Japanese central and local government may use green AI in city planning from a legal viewpoint based on three categories. The categories are green AI usage in city planning concerning things, green AI usage in city planning concerning people and green AI usage in city planning concerning automated decision-making.\n\n\nResearch limitations\nThis research is limited to an analysis of Japanese law, which means that issues other than law are not included in this paper. Further, although general legal issues are discussed, this paper is intended to discuss Japanese law issues only, and foreign laws are not discussed. Therefore, this paper mostly cites Japanese language papers published in domestic journals.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe intended practical implication of this paper is to allow central and local governments to determine – based on the proposed categories – whether green AI can be used for city planning purposes and under which conditions. The authors hope that this will assist the Japanese government in establishing rules on the usage of AI by governmental agencies and allow for the greater actual usage by Japanese central and local governments of green AI in future city planning.\n\n\nSocial implications\nAs the theme of this paper deals with governmental use (and the function of a government is to serve society), the social implications at issue can be said to be equivalent to the practical implication.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThere have been articles discussing Japanese administrative law restrictions on AI in general. However, as of now, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, there have been no articles published focusing on green AI used for city planning. The authors note that the green AI used for city planning would have different legal implications from AI’s usage by the government in general, such as the chatbot used by the agencies or lethal autonomous weapons by the military force. Therefore, this paper is original in focusing on green AI used for city planning.\n","PeriodicalId":51696,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable city planning and public administration assisted by green AI: attendant legal challenges under Japanese law\",\"authors\":\"T. Matsuo, Shun Iwamitsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/tg-06-2021-0109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to present the legal conditions under which governments may use green artificial intelligence (AI) in city planning. Although Japan was one of the early countries to release its general AI principles, it has been relatively slow in establishing conditions where administrative agencies may use AI. Granted, there have been some recent scholarship that discusses the usage of AI in general under Japanese administrative law, but the use of green AI in city planning under Japanese law has not yet been discussed. Hence, this paper intends to focus on green AI in city planning and discuss the conditions for usage based on different categories of AI.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper conducts a legal analysis on the utilization of AI for the purpose of sustainable city planning and administration in Japan. The approach of this paper is to summarize the existing scholarship in Japanese administrative law and analyse the new elements in the new field of green AI in city planning. This paper is not a natural science paper. The social science method of jurisprudence is used. This paper cites only public sources, and no informal literature has been referenced.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis paper establishes the conditions where Japanese central and local government may use green AI in city planning from a legal viewpoint based on three categories. The categories are green AI usage in city planning concerning things, green AI usage in city planning concerning people and green AI usage in city planning concerning automated decision-making.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations\\nThis research is limited to an analysis of Japanese law, which means that issues other than law are not included in this paper. Further, although general legal issues are discussed, this paper is intended to discuss Japanese law issues only, and foreign laws are not discussed. Therefore, this paper mostly cites Japanese language papers published in domestic journals.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe intended practical implication of this paper is to allow central and local governments to determine – based on the proposed categories – whether green AI can be used for city planning purposes and under which conditions. The authors hope that this will assist the Japanese government in establishing rules on the usage of AI by governmental agencies and allow for the greater actual usage by Japanese central and local governments of green AI in future city planning.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nAs the theme of this paper deals with governmental use (and the function of a government is to serve society), the social implications at issue can be said to be equivalent to the practical implication.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThere have been articles discussing Japanese administrative law restrictions on AI in general. However, as of now, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, there have been no articles published focusing on green AI used for city planning. The authors note that the green AI used for city planning would have different legal implications from AI’s usage by the government in general, such as the chatbot used by the agencies or lethal autonomous weapons by the military force. Therefore, this paper is original in focusing on green AI used for city planning.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":51696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-06-2021-0109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-06-2021-0109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文的目的是提出政府在城市规划中使用绿色人工智能(AI)的法律条件。虽然日本是较早发布人工智能总体原则的国家之一,但在建立行政机关可以使用人工智能的条件方面相对较慢。诚然,最近有一些学术研究在日本行政法下讨论了人工智能的总体使用,但在日本法律下,绿色人工智能在城市规划中的使用尚未得到讨论。因此,本文将重点关注绿色人工智能在城市规划中的应用,并根据不同类别的人工智能探讨其使用条件。设计/方法/途径本文对日本可持续城市规划和管理中人工智能的应用进行了法律分析。本文的方法是总结日本行政法的现有学术成果,分析城市规划中绿色人工智能新领域的新元素。这篇论文不是自然科学论文。运用了法理学的社会科学方法。本文仅引用公共资源,未引用非正式文献。研究结果:本文从法律角度出发,基于三种类型,确立了日本中央和地方政府在城市规划中使用绿色人工智能的条件。这三个类别是关于事物的绿色人工智能在城市规划中的使用,关于人的绿色人工智能在城市规划中的使用,以及关于自动决策的绿色人工智能在城市规划中的使用。研究局限:本研究仅限于对日本法律的分析,这意味着本文不包括法律以外的问题。此外,虽然讨论了一般法律问题,但本文仅打算讨论日本法律问题,而没有讨论外国法律。因此,本文主要引用国内期刊发表的日语论文。实际意义本文的实际意义是允许中央和地方政府根据拟议的类别确定绿色人工智能是否可以用于城市规划目的以及在哪些条件下使用。作者希望这将有助于日本政府制定政府机构使用人工智能的规则,并允许日本中央和地方政府在未来的城市规划中更多地实际使用绿色人工智能。由于本文的主题涉及政府的使用(政府的职能是服务社会),所讨论的社会影响可以说是等同于实际影响。有文章讨论了日本行政法对AI的总体限制。然而,截至目前,据笔者所知,还没有发表过关于绿色人工智能用于城市规划的文章。作者指出,用于城市规划的绿色人工智能将与一般政府使用的人工智能具有不同的法律含义,例如机构使用的聊天机器人或军队使用的致命自主武器。因此,本文的独创之处在于将绿色人工智能应用于城市规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustainable city planning and public administration assisted by green AI: attendant legal challenges under Japanese law
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present the legal conditions under which governments may use green artificial intelligence (AI) in city planning. Although Japan was one of the early countries to release its general AI principles, it has been relatively slow in establishing conditions where administrative agencies may use AI. Granted, there have been some recent scholarship that discusses the usage of AI in general under Japanese administrative law, but the use of green AI in city planning under Japanese law has not yet been discussed. Hence, this paper intends to focus on green AI in city planning and discuss the conditions for usage based on different categories of AI. Design/methodology/approach This paper conducts a legal analysis on the utilization of AI for the purpose of sustainable city planning and administration in Japan. The approach of this paper is to summarize the existing scholarship in Japanese administrative law and analyse the new elements in the new field of green AI in city planning. This paper is not a natural science paper. The social science method of jurisprudence is used. This paper cites only public sources, and no informal literature has been referenced. Findings This paper establishes the conditions where Japanese central and local government may use green AI in city planning from a legal viewpoint based on three categories. The categories are green AI usage in city planning concerning things, green AI usage in city planning concerning people and green AI usage in city planning concerning automated decision-making. Research limitations This research is limited to an analysis of Japanese law, which means that issues other than law are not included in this paper. Further, although general legal issues are discussed, this paper is intended to discuss Japanese law issues only, and foreign laws are not discussed. Therefore, this paper mostly cites Japanese language papers published in domestic journals. Practical implications The intended practical implication of this paper is to allow central and local governments to determine – based on the proposed categories – whether green AI can be used for city planning purposes and under which conditions. The authors hope that this will assist the Japanese government in establishing rules on the usage of AI by governmental agencies and allow for the greater actual usage by Japanese central and local governments of green AI in future city planning. Social implications As the theme of this paper deals with governmental use (and the function of a government is to serve society), the social implications at issue can be said to be equivalent to the practical implication. Originality/value There have been articles discussing Japanese administrative law restrictions on AI in general. However, as of now, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, there have been no articles published focusing on green AI used for city planning. The authors note that the green AI used for city planning would have different legal implications from AI’s usage by the government in general, such as the chatbot used by the agencies or lethal autonomous weapons by the military force. Therefore, this paper is original in focusing on green AI used for city planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Flawed charts in pension fund popular reports Public trust and collaborative e-governance performance: a study on government institutions and services Automation in public sector jobs and services: a framework to analyze public digital transformation’s impact in a data-constrained environment Digital inclusion for all? A gender-disaggregated analysis of e-government service use in Indonesia Measuring the effects of electronic government services and corrupt practices on information exchange: a comparison of public and private hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1