回应负面评论?管理响应策略与服务故障类型的相互作用

IF 11.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management Pub Date : 2022-09-14 DOI:10.1080/19368623.2022.2121349
Saba Salehi-Esfahani, Edwin N. Torres, Nan Hua
{"title":"回应负面评论?管理响应策略与服务故障类型的相互作用","authors":"Saba Salehi-Esfahani, Edwin N. Torres, Nan Hua","doi":"10.1080/19368623.2022.2121349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Restaurants often struggle with their approach to respond to service failure online. In this scenario-based experiment, the researchers study the effectiveness of management response types along with two overarching types of service failure concerning three outcomes. Some of the significant results are that it is not important whether the restaurant offers compensation or apology; as long as management responds to negative reviews, company’s reputation management works and customers are willing to shop from the restaurant. However, interestingly, with respect to customers’ recovery satisfaction, the findings underscored that companies should either not respond at all or should compensate dissatisfied customers instead of only writing an apology. Concerning the simultaneous existence of the technical and functional dimensions of a service failure regarding customers’ recovery satisfaction and their willingness to purchase from the restaurant, the findings underlined the centrality of technical dimension that is in contradiction with prior research findings. A discussion on findings is presented along with recommendations for future research.","PeriodicalId":47995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management","volume":"32 1","pages":"29 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":11.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responding to negative reviews? The interplay of management response strategy and service failure type\",\"authors\":\"Saba Salehi-Esfahani, Edwin N. Torres, Nan Hua\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19368623.2022.2121349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Restaurants often struggle with their approach to respond to service failure online. In this scenario-based experiment, the researchers study the effectiveness of management response types along with two overarching types of service failure concerning three outcomes. Some of the significant results are that it is not important whether the restaurant offers compensation or apology; as long as management responds to negative reviews, company’s reputation management works and customers are willing to shop from the restaurant. However, interestingly, with respect to customers’ recovery satisfaction, the findings underscored that companies should either not respond at all or should compensate dissatisfied customers instead of only writing an apology. Concerning the simultaneous existence of the technical and functional dimensions of a service failure regarding customers’ recovery satisfaction and their willingness to purchase from the restaurant, the findings underlined the centrality of technical dimension that is in contradiction with prior research findings. A discussion on findings is presented along with recommendations for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"29 - 49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2022.2121349\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2022.2121349","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要:餐馆在处理在线服务故障时,往往会遇到一些困难。在这个基于场景的实验中,研究人员研究了管理响应类型以及两种主要类型的服务失败对三种结果的有效性。一些重要的结果是,餐馆是否提供赔偿或道歉并不重要;只要管理层对负面评论做出回应,公司的声誉管理就会起作用,顾客就会愿意在这家餐厅购物。然而,有趣的是,就客户的恢复满意度而言,调查结果强调,公司要么根本不回应,要么赔偿不满意的客户,而不是仅仅写一封道歉信。关于服务失败的技术维度和功能维度同时存在,影响顾客的恢复满意度和购买意愿,研究结果强调了技术维度的中心性,这与先前的研究结果相矛盾。对研究结果进行了讨论,并提出了对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Responding to negative reviews? The interplay of management response strategy and service failure type
ABSTRACT Restaurants often struggle with their approach to respond to service failure online. In this scenario-based experiment, the researchers study the effectiveness of management response types along with two overarching types of service failure concerning three outcomes. Some of the significant results are that it is not important whether the restaurant offers compensation or apology; as long as management responds to negative reviews, company’s reputation management works and customers are willing to shop from the restaurant. However, interestingly, with respect to customers’ recovery satisfaction, the findings underscored that companies should either not respond at all or should compensate dissatisfied customers instead of only writing an apology. Concerning the simultaneous existence of the technical and functional dimensions of a service failure regarding customers’ recovery satisfaction and their willingness to purchase from the restaurant, the findings underlined the centrality of technical dimension that is in contradiction with prior research findings. A discussion on findings is presented along with recommendations for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management serves as a peer-reviewed platform dedicated to advancing understanding, practice, and education in hospitality marketing and management. It strives to foster the development of knowledge and theory by promoting new ideas, models, approaches, and paradigms. Embracing a multifaceted approach that spans administrative disciplines, liberal arts, and social sciences, the journal disseminates knowledge through high-quality, peer-reviewed research papers, reports, and book reviews. It stands as a unique forum for the community of students, academics, and practitioners who share a common interest and commitment to the field of hospitality marketing and management.
期刊最新文献
How dark traits and regulatory focus manifest in online hotel reviews: a textual content analysis The hidden gems in online reviews: unraveling how the expressions of affective needs impact review usefulness Service robots in my workplace: effects of employee-service robot co-work experiences on psychological empowerment Customer experiences with service robots in hotels: a review and research agenda Employees’ sustainability behavior: moderating effects of customer environmental awareness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1