从性别角度看紧缩政策、公共支出和发展:墨西哥和巴西妇女的地位如何?

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Panoeconomicus Pub Date : 2020-06-23 DOI:10.2298/pan2003385m
Oscar Martínez, I. Duenas, Monika Meireles
{"title":"从性别角度看紧缩政策、公共支出和发展:墨西哥和巴西妇女的地位如何?","authors":"Oscar Martínez, I. Duenas, Monika Meireles","doi":"10.2298/pan2003385m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the impact of austerity policies on gender inequality\n in Mexico and Brazil. More specifically, it seeks to discuss the need to\n reconcile public expenditure with a development strategy that actually\n includes a gender perspective. The feminization of poverty is of particular\n interest, as it is the basis upon which we try to outline the socioeconomic\n conditions in which Mexican and Brazilian women live with regards to\n progress, setbacks, and challenges. Thus, a brief explanation of the term\n austerity is provided with the purpose of reflecting on the limitations and\n opportunities that public expenditure might have in terms of gender\n inequality. Then, basic economic statistics concerning the dynamics of\n economic growth and public expenditure are included and certain key\n variables revolving around gender gaps in both countries are examined.\n Finally, we offer a diagnosis of the consequences of poverty on the female\n population in order to identify the leeway that public expenditure focused\n on gender should have for the most vulnerable population sector. The purpose\n is to promote development policies based on greater equality. In summary, as\n a result of the study, we observe that public expenditure intended at\n fighting against poverty (female-male) had considerable success in the case\n of Brazil, but not in the case of Mexico. However, in both countries, the\n recent deepening of austerity policies could limit the efforts of public\n expenditure on the feminization of poverty in particular, and on gender\n inequalities in general.","PeriodicalId":45222,"journal":{"name":"Panoeconomicus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Austerity Policies, Public Expenditure, and Development from a Gender Perspective: What Is the Status of Mexican and Brazilian Women?\",\"authors\":\"Oscar Martínez, I. Duenas, Monika Meireles\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/pan2003385m\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the impact of austerity policies on gender inequality\\n in Mexico and Brazil. More specifically, it seeks to discuss the need to\\n reconcile public expenditure with a development strategy that actually\\n includes a gender perspective. The feminization of poverty is of particular\\n interest, as it is the basis upon which we try to outline the socioeconomic\\n conditions in which Mexican and Brazilian women live with regards to\\n progress, setbacks, and challenges. Thus, a brief explanation of the term\\n austerity is provided with the purpose of reflecting on the limitations and\\n opportunities that public expenditure might have in terms of gender\\n inequality. Then, basic economic statistics concerning the dynamics of\\n economic growth and public expenditure are included and certain key\\n variables revolving around gender gaps in both countries are examined.\\n Finally, we offer a diagnosis of the consequences of poverty on the female\\n population in order to identify the leeway that public expenditure focused\\n on gender should have for the most vulnerable population sector. The purpose\\n is to promote development policies based on greater equality. In summary, as\\n a result of the study, we observe that public expenditure intended at\\n fighting against poverty (female-male) had considerable success in the case\\n of Brazil, but not in the case of Mexico. However, in both countries, the\\n recent deepening of austerity policies could limit the efforts of public\\n expenditure on the feminization of poverty in particular, and on gender\\n inequalities in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Panoeconomicus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Panoeconomicus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/pan2003385m\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Panoeconomicus","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/pan2003385m","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文考察了紧缩政策对墨西哥和巴西两性不平等的影响。更具体地说,它试图讨论将公共支出与实际包括性别观点的发展战略相协调的必要性。贫困女性化尤其令人感兴趣,因为这是我们试图概述墨西哥和巴西妇女在进步、挫折和挑战方面所处的社会经济条件的基础。因此,对紧缩一词作了简要解释,目的是反思公共支出在性别不平等方面可能存在的局限性和机会。然后,纳入了有关经济增长和公共支出动态的基本经济统计数据,并审查了两国围绕性别差距的某些关键变量。最后,我们对贫困对女性人口的影响进行了诊断,以确定以性别为重点的公共支出应该为最脆弱的人口部门留出的余地。其目的是促进基于更大平等的发展政策。总之,根据这项研究,我们观察到,旨在消除贫困的公共支出(女性-男性)在巴西取得了相当大的成功,但在墨西哥却没有。然而,在这两个国家,最近紧缩政策的深化可能会限制公共支出在贫困女性化方面的努力,以及在普遍的性别不平等方面的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Austerity Policies, Public Expenditure, and Development from a Gender Perspective: What Is the Status of Mexican and Brazilian Women?
This article examines the impact of austerity policies on gender inequality in Mexico and Brazil. More specifically, it seeks to discuss the need to reconcile public expenditure with a development strategy that actually includes a gender perspective. The feminization of poverty is of particular interest, as it is the basis upon which we try to outline the socioeconomic conditions in which Mexican and Brazilian women live with regards to progress, setbacks, and challenges. Thus, a brief explanation of the term austerity is provided with the purpose of reflecting on the limitations and opportunities that public expenditure might have in terms of gender inequality. Then, basic economic statistics concerning the dynamics of economic growth and public expenditure are included and certain key variables revolving around gender gaps in both countries are examined. Finally, we offer a diagnosis of the consequences of poverty on the female population in order to identify the leeway that public expenditure focused on gender should have for the most vulnerable population sector. The purpose is to promote development policies based on greater equality. In summary, as a result of the study, we observe that public expenditure intended at fighting against poverty (female-male) had considerable success in the case of Brazil, but not in the case of Mexico. However, in both countries, the recent deepening of austerity policies could limit the efforts of public expenditure on the feminization of poverty in particular, and on gender inequalities in general.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Panoeconomicus
Panoeconomicus ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evolvability of cancer-associated genes under APOBEC3A/B selection. Toward a cashless society. Cash and non-cash payments in Spain, 1989-2014 The short- and long-run relationship between house prices and bank credit in developed and emerging market economies: A comparative study Skill versus inequality Volatility spillover networks of credit risk: Evidence from ASW and CDS spreads in Turkey and Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1