Inframammary Fold Banking of the Non-Dominant Superficial Epigastric Vein (SIEV) in Unilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Simple and Helpful Backup Option for Revision Surgery

Free flaps from the lower abdomen represent the workhorses of modern autologous, microvascular breast reconstruction. Rare signs of venous congestion often become evident during the primary index operation, but a secondary shift of the initially dominant drainage of the DIEV system to the SIEV system with consequent malperfusion is a feared, rare event requiring urgent decision, and complex skill using vein grafts and additional anastomosis to restore a sufficient venous outflow. For secondary anastomosis of the SIEV, especially in stacked flaps, a vein graft to the DIEV or retrograde IMV may be necessary, but this requires an additional donor site, thus prolonging procedure time during the emergency operation and resulting in additional scars of the graft’s donor site. We report on a versatile, easy technique of scheduled inframammary fold banking of the dissected, flushed, and clipped non-dominant superficial epigastric vein (SIEV) in unilateral autologous breast reconstruction during the index operation. The banked graft may service as an easy and convenient accessible vein graft in the rare event of secondary shifting of the initial dominant drainage of the DIEV to the SIEV system with the need for urgent re-operation. We retrospectively evaluated the management and outcome of all suitable patients receiving autologous breast reconstruction with a unilateral abdominal DIEP or MS-Tram flap accompanied by banking of the SIEV in the breast pocket between 2017 and 2020 in the present study. In two out of 42 patients (4.8%) receiving autologous breast reconstruction with an abdominal DIEP or MS-TRAM flap with banking of the SIEV in the breast pocket, secondary malperfusion of the flap with progressive venous congestion occurred during the first 48 h perioperatively, between 2 and 37 (mean: 19.5) hours after skin closure. In both cases malperfusion was due to secondary SIEV system dominance, and the banked vein was used as an interpositional graft to the retrograde IMV (case 1) or the DIEV (case 2). Revision surgery lasted between 95 and 121 (mean: 108) minutes without the need for further vein graft harvesting, and further healing was uneventful. Based on the limited cases, inframammary fold banking of the non-dominant SIEV is a versatile, beneficial, and feasible concept with scarce additional dissection time and can be done in all unilateral breast reconstructions to have a reliable graft for emergency re-exploration. It is a useful approach in the context of spare part surgery and tissue banking to safeguard against the rare instance of venous congestion and need for an interpositional graft.