批判性和创造性的营销教学法:面对花言巧语,解决不平等,激发变革

IF 3.5 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Marketing Management Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/0267257X.2023.2187539
T. Heath, Mona Moufahim, L. O’Malley
{"title":"批判性和创造性的营销教学法:面对花言巧语,解决不平等,激发变革","authors":"T. Heath, Mona Moufahim, L. O’Malley","doi":"10.1080/0267257X.2023.2187539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue shines a light on critical scholarship in marketing education by curating both theorisations and innovative practices. Frustrated with the prevalence of standardised and self-serving representations of marketing, our intention is to amplify voices that problematise accepted wisdom in the field. Importantly, we move away from a critique of the marketing logic per se to celebrate novel approaches in its pedagogy built upon a broad understanding of our role as educators and of the transformative potential that this role holds. The manuscripts published here showcase impressive efforts to denaturalise (Fournier & Grey, 2000) marketing in the classroom, and bring attention to the fortitude and creativity that they evince. Creativity and critique are, at first glance, opposites. The first spins stories; the second picks them apart. In creating, we let our imaginations take flight. In critique we demand explanations for every step. When looked at more closely, however, the two processes are joined at the hip. Oft-repeated advice on writing, such as ‘write drunk; edit sober’ and ‘kill your darlings’ (attributed to Ernest Hemingway and William Faulkner respectively, in each case apparently wrongly), speaks to the need to balance the creative imagination with a clear-headed and sometimes harsh critique of one’s own work. Likewise, creative vision in business, if uncoupled from a critical analysis of that vision’s weaknesses, can yield the harms inflicted by Elizabeth Holmes and Sam Bankman-Fried in desperately trying to bend reality to fit their dreams. Reflexivity, a form of self-directed critique, is fundamental in the process of knowledge creation. Conversely, critique can barely get started without a significant amount of imaginative, and creative thought. To ask ‘Why is it this way?’ is always, in part, to imagine it could be different. Furthermore, explicitly telling a different story about the phenomenon under study can elevate criticism above merely complaining into something capable of creating transformation. Hence, the production of new understandings requires a dialectical relationship between creativity and criticality (as well as observation and existing knowledge). We move forward by critiquing what we see in the world, creating imaginative new possibilities and then critiquing those creations. This is equally true for researchers, teachers and learners. We believe that there are admirable examples of these elements in the projects presented in this special issue and are delighted to share these with the reader.","PeriodicalId":51383,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical and creative marketing pedagogies: confronting rhetoric, addressing inequality, inspiring change\",\"authors\":\"T. Heath, Mona Moufahim, L. O’Malley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0267257X.2023.2187539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This special issue shines a light on critical scholarship in marketing education by curating both theorisations and innovative practices. Frustrated with the prevalence of standardised and self-serving representations of marketing, our intention is to amplify voices that problematise accepted wisdom in the field. Importantly, we move away from a critique of the marketing logic per se to celebrate novel approaches in its pedagogy built upon a broad understanding of our role as educators and of the transformative potential that this role holds. The manuscripts published here showcase impressive efforts to denaturalise (Fournier & Grey, 2000) marketing in the classroom, and bring attention to the fortitude and creativity that they evince. Creativity and critique are, at first glance, opposites. The first spins stories; the second picks them apart. In creating, we let our imaginations take flight. In critique we demand explanations for every step. When looked at more closely, however, the two processes are joined at the hip. Oft-repeated advice on writing, such as ‘write drunk; edit sober’ and ‘kill your darlings’ (attributed to Ernest Hemingway and William Faulkner respectively, in each case apparently wrongly), speaks to the need to balance the creative imagination with a clear-headed and sometimes harsh critique of one’s own work. Likewise, creative vision in business, if uncoupled from a critical analysis of that vision’s weaknesses, can yield the harms inflicted by Elizabeth Holmes and Sam Bankman-Fried in desperately trying to bend reality to fit their dreams. Reflexivity, a form of self-directed critique, is fundamental in the process of knowledge creation. Conversely, critique can barely get started without a significant amount of imaginative, and creative thought. To ask ‘Why is it this way?’ is always, in part, to imagine it could be different. Furthermore, explicitly telling a different story about the phenomenon under study can elevate criticism above merely complaining into something capable of creating transformation. Hence, the production of new understandings requires a dialectical relationship between creativity and criticality (as well as observation and existing knowledge). We move forward by critiquing what we see in the world, creating imaginative new possibilities and then critiquing those creations. This is equally true for researchers, teachers and learners. We believe that there are admirable examples of these elements in the projects presented in this special issue and are delighted to share these with the reader.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marketing Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marketing Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2023.2187539\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2023.2187539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期特刊通过策划理论和创新实践,对市场营销教育中的关键奖学金进行了探讨。对普遍存在的标准化和自私自利的营销表示感到沮丧,我们的目的是放大那些对该领域公认的智慧提出问题的声音。重要的是,我们从对营销逻辑本身的批评转向了对其教学法的新方法的赞美,这种方法建立在对我们作为教育者的角色和这一角色所具有的变革潜力的广泛理解之上。在这里发表的手稿展示了令人印象深刻的努力变性(富尼耶和格雷,2000年)营销在课堂上,并引起人们对他们所表现出的毅力和创造力的关注。乍一看,创造力和批判是对立的。前者编故事;第二步把他们分开。在创造中,我们让我们的想象力飞翔。在批判中,我们要求对每一步作出解释。然而,当更仔细地观察时,这两个过程是紧密相连的。经常被重复的写作建议,比如“醉酒写作”;“编辑清醒”和“杀死你的爱人”(分别被认为是欧内斯特·海明威和威廉·福克纳说的,但显然都错了),说明了需要在创造性想象力和头脑清醒(有时是对自己作品的严厉批评)之间取得平衡。同样,商业领域的创造性愿景,如果脱离对愿景弱点的批判性分析,就会产生伊丽莎白•霍姆斯(Elizabeth Holmes)和萨姆•班克曼-弗里德(Sam Bankman-Fried)在绝望地试图扭曲现实以适应梦想时所造成的危害。反身性是一种自我批判的形式,是知识创造过程中的基础。相反,如果没有大量的想象力和创造性思维,评论几乎无法开始。去问“为什么会这样?”在某种程度上,总是想象它可能会有所不同。此外,明确地对所研究的现象讲述不同的故事,可以将批评从抱怨提升到能够创造变革的程度。因此,新理解的产生需要创造性和批判性(以及观察和现有知识)之间的辩证关系。我们通过批评我们在世界上看到的东西,创造富有想象力的新可能性,然后批评这些创造来前进。研究人员、教师和学习者都是如此。我们相信,在本期特刊中介绍的项目中,有这些元素的令人钦佩的例子,我们很高兴与读者分享这些例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Critical and creative marketing pedagogies: confronting rhetoric, addressing inequality, inspiring change
This special issue shines a light on critical scholarship in marketing education by curating both theorisations and innovative practices. Frustrated with the prevalence of standardised and self-serving representations of marketing, our intention is to amplify voices that problematise accepted wisdom in the field. Importantly, we move away from a critique of the marketing logic per se to celebrate novel approaches in its pedagogy built upon a broad understanding of our role as educators and of the transformative potential that this role holds. The manuscripts published here showcase impressive efforts to denaturalise (Fournier & Grey, 2000) marketing in the classroom, and bring attention to the fortitude and creativity that they evince. Creativity and critique are, at first glance, opposites. The first spins stories; the second picks them apart. In creating, we let our imaginations take flight. In critique we demand explanations for every step. When looked at more closely, however, the two processes are joined at the hip. Oft-repeated advice on writing, such as ‘write drunk; edit sober’ and ‘kill your darlings’ (attributed to Ernest Hemingway and William Faulkner respectively, in each case apparently wrongly), speaks to the need to balance the creative imagination with a clear-headed and sometimes harsh critique of one’s own work. Likewise, creative vision in business, if uncoupled from a critical analysis of that vision’s weaknesses, can yield the harms inflicted by Elizabeth Holmes and Sam Bankman-Fried in desperately trying to bend reality to fit their dreams. Reflexivity, a form of self-directed critique, is fundamental in the process of knowledge creation. Conversely, critique can barely get started without a significant amount of imaginative, and creative thought. To ask ‘Why is it this way?’ is always, in part, to imagine it could be different. Furthermore, explicitly telling a different story about the phenomenon under study can elevate criticism above merely complaining into something capable of creating transformation. Hence, the production of new understandings requires a dialectical relationship between creativity and criticality (as well as observation and existing knowledge). We move forward by critiquing what we see in the world, creating imaginative new possibilities and then critiquing those creations. This is equally true for researchers, teachers and learners. We believe that there are admirable examples of these elements in the projects presented in this special issue and are delighted to share these with the reader.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
79
期刊最新文献
“I want world peace… oh, and bigger boobs”: repetitions and stereotyping on Friends’ sustainable character Phoebe Conceptualising online consumer counterpublics In pursuit of relevant and rigorous qualitative research in marketing academia Market segmentation strategy, target markets, and competitors: a resource-advantage theory perspective Film and the stigmatisation of ageing female sexuality: consumer commentary of Good Luck to You, Leo Grande
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1