《刑法》第103条关于危害人类罪的规则是否需要惩罚作为决定标准:对最高法院第34.447-2016号判决的评论

F. Parra
{"title":"《刑法》第103条关于危害人类罪的规则是否需要惩罚作为决定标准:对最高法院第34.447-2016号判决的评论","authors":"F. Parra","doi":"10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Supreme Court an intense debate exists on the proceeds of the rule of the article 103 of the Penal Code in the crimes against humanity because of the prohibition \nthat the Humanitarian International Criminal Law establishes for the full prescription of those crimes. The resolution of the controversy has happened for determining \nif the foundations of the prescription, specially of «need of sentence», are diverse or analogous to those of the so-called «half prescription».","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":"197-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La necesidad de la pena como criterio determinante en la procedencia de la regla del artículo 103 del Código Penal en ilícitos de lesa humanidad: Comentario a la sentencia 34.447-2016 de la Corte Suprema\",\"authors\":\"F. Parra\",\"doi\":\"10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the Supreme Court an intense debate exists on the proceeds of the rule of the article 103 of the Penal Code in the crimes against humanity because of the prohibition \\nthat the Humanitarian International Criminal Law establishes for the full prescription of those crimes. The resolution of the controversy has happened for determining \\nif the foundations of the prescription, specially of «need of sentence», are diverse or analogous to those of the so-called «half prescription».\",\"PeriodicalId\":31642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"197-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在最高法院,由于《人道主义国际刑法》规定了全面规定危害人类罪的禁令,因此对《刑法典》第103条规则在危害人类罪中的收益进行了激烈的辩论。争议的解决是为了确定处方的基础,特别是“需要判刑”的基础,是否与所谓的“半处方”的基础不同或相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La necesidad de la pena como criterio determinante en la procedencia de la regla del artículo 103 del Código Penal en ilícitos de lesa humanidad: Comentario a la sentencia 34.447-2016 de la Corte Suprema
In the Supreme Court an intense debate exists on the proceeds of the rule of the article 103 of the Penal Code in the crimes against humanity because of the prohibition that the Humanitarian International Criminal Law establishes for the full prescription of those crimes. The resolution of the controversy has happened for determining if the foundations of the prescription, specially of «need of sentence», are diverse or analogous to those of the so-called «half prescription».
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
La sustracción de cosas corporales informes. El caso del agua, la electricidad y el gas Aproximaciones teóricas para una explicación de la violencia carcelaria interpersonal: un debate pendiente en el sistema penitenciario chileno Consideraciones acerca del tratamiento del error de prohibición en la jurisprudencia chilena ¿Es necesario un acuerdo en la coautoría? Una revisión crítica de acuerdo con la teoría de la acción El bien jurídico protegido como límite -aún posible- entre el derecho penal y el derecho administrativo sancionador: Reflexiones desde el derecho penal económico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1