用于微塑性分析的保存和未保存的鱼肠的消化,重点是质量保证

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Journal of Cellular Biotechnology Pub Date : 2022-11-10 DOI:10.3233/jcb-220076
Fabiola Lopez Avila, Sophie Stürmer, A. Monteleone, Dave Neely, B. Kuhajda, A. George, Martin Knoll, Weronika Schary, A. Fath
{"title":"用于微塑性分析的保存和未保存的鱼肠的消化,重点是质量保证","authors":"Fabiola Lopez Avila, Sophie Stürmer, A. Monteleone, Dave Neely, B. Kuhajda, A. George, Martin Knoll, Weronika Schary, A. Fath","doi":"10.3233/jcb-220076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND, Different preservation media used on fish samples may influence the digestion of organic matter for microplastic (MP) particle detection. Comparison of fresh and conserved fish is thereby problematic. OBJECTIVE, For quality assurance purposes and comparability of MP research, a method for digestion of preserved tissue like intestine with little impact on most MP particles was implemented. METHODS, Conserved fish samples were digested using SDS, KOH and Fenton’s reagents. The effect of the different chemicals used on different MP particles was then analyzed using Raman hit quality. Therefore, different filter materials were investigated using PMMA particles. RESULTS, Moist grided nitrocellulose filter was found best suited for this study. The effects of this digestion protocol on different polymer particles differed among polymers. Two of the used polymer particles dissolved during SDS + KOH treatment. PVC hard showed the highest loss of Raman hit quality (29.5 %). Some fish showed residues of sand or chitin from insects depending on their feeding strategy which could not be digested using this protocol. CONCLUSION, Not every polymer could be detected reliably using this protocol. For residues like sand or chitin, a density separation and enzymatic chitin degradation using chitinase may be needed, which could be implemented into this protocol.","PeriodicalId":15286,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cellular Biotechnology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digestion of preserved and unpreserved fish intestines for microplastic analysis with emphasis on quality assurance\",\"authors\":\"Fabiola Lopez Avila, Sophie Stürmer, A. Monteleone, Dave Neely, B. Kuhajda, A. George, Martin Knoll, Weronika Schary, A. Fath\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/jcb-220076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND, Different preservation media used on fish samples may influence the digestion of organic matter for microplastic (MP) particle detection. Comparison of fresh and conserved fish is thereby problematic. OBJECTIVE, For quality assurance purposes and comparability of MP research, a method for digestion of preserved tissue like intestine with little impact on most MP particles was implemented. METHODS, Conserved fish samples were digested using SDS, KOH and Fenton’s reagents. The effect of the different chemicals used on different MP particles was then analyzed using Raman hit quality. Therefore, different filter materials were investigated using PMMA particles. RESULTS, Moist grided nitrocellulose filter was found best suited for this study. The effects of this digestion protocol on different polymer particles differed among polymers. Two of the used polymer particles dissolved during SDS + KOH treatment. PVC hard showed the highest loss of Raman hit quality (29.5 %). Some fish showed residues of sand or chitin from insects depending on their feeding strategy which could not be digested using this protocol. CONCLUSION, Not every polymer could be detected reliably using this protocol. For residues like sand or chitin, a density separation and enzymatic chitin degradation using chitinase may be needed, which could be implemented into this protocol.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cellular Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cellular Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/jcb-220076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cellular Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/jcb-220076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鱼类样品中不同的保存介质可能会影响微塑料(MP)颗粒检测中有机物的消化。因此,比较新鲜和保存的鱼是有问题的。目的:为了保证MP研究的质量和可比性,建立了一种对大多数MP颗粒影响较小的小肠等保存组织的消化方法。方法:采用SDS、KOH和Fenton试剂对保存的鱼标本进行酶解。然后用拉曼命中质量分析了不同化学物质对不同MP颗粒的影响。因此,采用PMMA颗粒对不同的过滤材料进行了研究。结果:湿栅硝化纤维素过滤器最适合于本研究。该消解方案对不同聚合物颗粒的影响因聚合物而异。在SDS + KOH处理过程中,两个使用的聚合物颗粒溶解。PVC硬料拉曼命中质量损失最大(29.5%)。根据不同的取食方式,有些鱼体内有沙子或昆虫的几丁质残留,使用本方法无法消化。结论:并不是所有的聚合物都能可靠地检测到。对于沙子或几丁质等残留物,可能需要利用几丁质酶进行密度分离和几丁质酶降解,这可以在本方案中实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digestion of preserved and unpreserved fish intestines for microplastic analysis with emphasis on quality assurance
BACKGROUND, Different preservation media used on fish samples may influence the digestion of organic matter for microplastic (MP) particle detection. Comparison of fresh and conserved fish is thereby problematic. OBJECTIVE, For quality assurance purposes and comparability of MP research, a method for digestion of preserved tissue like intestine with little impact on most MP particles was implemented. METHODS, Conserved fish samples were digested using SDS, KOH and Fenton’s reagents. The effect of the different chemicals used on different MP particles was then analyzed using Raman hit quality. Therefore, different filter materials were investigated using PMMA particles. RESULTS, Moist grided nitrocellulose filter was found best suited for this study. The effects of this digestion protocol on different polymer particles differed among polymers. Two of the used polymer particles dissolved during SDS + KOH treatment. PVC hard showed the highest loss of Raman hit quality (29.5 %). Some fish showed residues of sand or chitin from insects depending on their feeding strategy which could not be digested using this protocol. CONCLUSION, Not every polymer could be detected reliably using this protocol. For residues like sand or chitin, a density separation and enzymatic chitin degradation using chitinase may be needed, which could be implemented into this protocol.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cellular Biotechnology
Journal of Cellular Biotechnology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Some questions about a new study of coefficient microcirculation in example in patients with limb-threatening ischemia and intermittent claudication Functional regulation of hydroxyproline, ascorbic acid and lipid peroxidation during GABA chitosan nanoparticles mediated liver regeneration Periodontal medicine: The bidirectional relationship between osteoporosis and periodontal health In-vitro studies of relative intracellular alterations caused by three variants of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Spirulina platensis: A comprehensive review of its nutritional value, antioxidant activity and functional food potential
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1