南亚的土地危机和农业市场改革

IF 1.3 Q1 AREA STUDIES Millennial Asia Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1177/09763996211063444
Sukhpal Singh, B. Harriss‐White, L. Singh
{"title":"南亚的土地危机和农业市场改革","authors":"Sukhpal Singh, B. Harriss‐White, L. Singh","doi":"10.1177/09763996211063444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"South Asia is home to 0.5 billion multi-dimensionally poor people accounting for 29% of the total population (UNDP & OPHI, 2021). In South Asia, the agricultural sector provides employment to 42% of the workforce (Singh & Gill, 2020), a majority of whom, both men and women, are not only poor but also indebted (Guerin, 2014; Singh et al., 2020). It is well established that productivity and wages in the agricultural sector are very low: characterized by small farm size and differentiated exchange relations for inputs and products (Aga, 2019; Rawal & Verma, 2020). While regionally and socially uneven, the agrarian crisis is severe. There is a dire need to consider and enact agriculture sector reforms that may reduce the contradictions of agrarian transformation and support its victims. Indian economic reforms began in July 1991 with a focus on industrializing the economy for faster economic development. Agricultural reforms started slowly with pre-production and post-harvest measures (Harriss-White & Janakarajan, 2004). The experience of the last three decades has failed to answer the question of whether the economic reform programme has accelerated the structural transformation of the Indian economy. As expected, the agricultural sector’s contribution to the GDP has come down significantly. However, at 44%, the workforce’s dependence on agriculture continues to be high. The terms of trade have also remained mostly against agriculture, and thus, the cost of economic Millennial Asia 12(3) 265–276, 2021 © 2021 Association of Asia Scholars Reprints and permissions: in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india DOI: 10.1177/09763996211063444 journals.sagepub.com/home/mla","PeriodicalId":41791,"journal":{"name":"Millennial Asia","volume":"12 1","pages":"265 - 276"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agrarian Crisis and Agricultural Market Reforms in South Asia\",\"authors\":\"Sukhpal Singh, B. Harriss‐White, L. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09763996211063444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"South Asia is home to 0.5 billion multi-dimensionally poor people accounting for 29% of the total population (UNDP & OPHI, 2021). In South Asia, the agricultural sector provides employment to 42% of the workforce (Singh & Gill, 2020), a majority of whom, both men and women, are not only poor but also indebted (Guerin, 2014; Singh et al., 2020). It is well established that productivity and wages in the agricultural sector are very low: characterized by small farm size and differentiated exchange relations for inputs and products (Aga, 2019; Rawal & Verma, 2020). While regionally and socially uneven, the agrarian crisis is severe. There is a dire need to consider and enact agriculture sector reforms that may reduce the contradictions of agrarian transformation and support its victims. Indian economic reforms began in July 1991 with a focus on industrializing the economy for faster economic development. Agricultural reforms started slowly with pre-production and post-harvest measures (Harriss-White & Janakarajan, 2004). The experience of the last three decades has failed to answer the question of whether the economic reform programme has accelerated the structural transformation of the Indian economy. As expected, the agricultural sector’s contribution to the GDP has come down significantly. However, at 44%, the workforce’s dependence on agriculture continues to be high. The terms of trade have also remained mostly against agriculture, and thus, the cost of economic Millennial Asia 12(3) 265–276, 2021 © 2021 Association of Asia Scholars Reprints and permissions: in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india DOI: 10.1177/09763996211063444 journals.sagepub.com/home/mla\",\"PeriodicalId\":41791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Millennial Asia\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"265 - 276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Millennial Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996211063444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Millennial Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996211063444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

南亚有5亿多维贫困人口,占总人口的29%(联合国开发计划署和OPHI, 2021年)。在南亚,农业部门为42%的劳动力提供就业机会(Singh & Gill, 2020),其中大多数人,无论男女,不仅贫穷,而且负债累累(Guerin, 2014;Singh et al., 2020)。众所周知,农业部门的生产率和工资水平非常低:其特点是农场规模小,投入物和产品的交换关系存在差异(Aga, 2019;Rawal & Verma, 2020)。虽然区域和社会不平衡,但农业危机是严重的。迫切需要考虑和实施农业部门改革,以减少农业转型的矛盾,并支持其受害者。印度经济改革始于1991年7月,重点是实现经济工业化,以加快经济发展。农业改革起步缓慢,采取生产前和收获后措施(harris - white & Janakarajan, 2004)。过去三十年的经验未能回答经济改革方案是否加速了印度经济结构转型的问题。正如预期的那样,农业部门对国内生产总值的贡献已经明显下降。然而,44%的劳动力对农业的依赖仍然很高。贸易条件也主要针对农业,因此,经济成本千禧亚洲12(3)265-276,2021©2021亚洲学者协会转载和许可:in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india DOI: 10.1177/09763996211063444 journals.sagepub.com/home/mla
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Agrarian Crisis and Agricultural Market Reforms in South Asia
South Asia is home to 0.5 billion multi-dimensionally poor people accounting for 29% of the total population (UNDP & OPHI, 2021). In South Asia, the agricultural sector provides employment to 42% of the workforce (Singh & Gill, 2020), a majority of whom, both men and women, are not only poor but also indebted (Guerin, 2014; Singh et al., 2020). It is well established that productivity and wages in the agricultural sector are very low: characterized by small farm size and differentiated exchange relations for inputs and products (Aga, 2019; Rawal & Verma, 2020). While regionally and socially uneven, the agrarian crisis is severe. There is a dire need to consider and enact agriculture sector reforms that may reduce the contradictions of agrarian transformation and support its victims. Indian economic reforms began in July 1991 with a focus on industrializing the economy for faster economic development. Agricultural reforms started slowly with pre-production and post-harvest measures (Harriss-White & Janakarajan, 2004). The experience of the last three decades has failed to answer the question of whether the economic reform programme has accelerated the structural transformation of the Indian economy. As expected, the agricultural sector’s contribution to the GDP has come down significantly. However, at 44%, the workforce’s dependence on agriculture continues to be high. The terms of trade have also remained mostly against agriculture, and thus, the cost of economic Millennial Asia 12(3) 265–276, 2021 © 2021 Association of Asia Scholars Reprints and permissions: in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india DOI: 10.1177/09763996211063444 journals.sagepub.com/home/mla
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Millennial Asia
Millennial Asia AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Millennial Asia: An International Journal of Asian Studies is a multidisciplinary, refereed biannual journal of the Association of Asia Scholars (AAS)–an association of the alumni of the Asian Scholarship Foundation (ASF). It aims to encourage multifaceted, multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research on Asia, in order to understand its fast changing context as a growth pole of global economy. By providing a forum for Asian scholars situated globally, it promotes dialogue between the global academic community, civil society and policy makers on Asian issues. The journal examines Asia on a regional and comparative basis, emphasizing patterns and tendencies that go beyond national borders and are globally relevant. Modern and contemporary Asia has witnessed dynamic transformations in cultures, societies, economies and political institutions, among others. It confronts issues of collective identity formation, ecological crisis, rapid economic change and resurgence of religion and communal identifies while embracing globalization. An analysis of past experiences can help produce a deeper understanding of contemporary change. In particular, the journal is interested in locating contemporary changes within a historical perspective, through the use of interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approaches. This way, it hopes to promote comparative studies involving Asia’s various regions. The journal brings out both thematic and general issues and the thrust areas are: Asian integration, Asian economies, sociology, culture, politics, governance, security, development issues, arts and literature and any other such issue as the editorial board may deem fit. The core fields include development encompassing agriculture, industry, regional trade, social sectors like health and education and development policy across the region and in specific countries in a comparative perspective.
期刊最新文献
Healthcare Expenditure, Health Outcomes and Economic Growth: A Study of BRICS Countries Effect of Technical NTMs on Indian Exports to ASEAN: What Role Do Logistics and Governance Capabilities Play? Unravelling the Dynamics of Landscape Changes and Climate-sensitive Diseases in Kuttanad Wetland Ecosystem, India Navigating the Silver Seas of Ageing: A Phenomenological Study on Life Course Impacts on Older Adults in Senior Living Facilities Politics of Infrastructural Developmentalism: A Spatial Reading of the Colombo Port City Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1