菲律宾参与抗议活动的预测因素

Francis Joseph A. Dee
{"title":"菲律宾参与抗议活动的预测因素","authors":"Francis Joseph A. Dee","doi":"10.1080/01154451.2018.1565641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Social movement theory links protest to psychological (grievance, system justification, uncertainty salience), strategic (costs, trust, norms), resource-based (sex, age, income, group membership, political interest, media consumption), and structural (political opportunity structures) predictors. This paper answers the question, “Why do people protest in the Philippines?” by assessing whether these variables predict protest in the Philippines using data from the 2012 World Values Survey. Specifically, it tests the following hypotheses: (1) more altruistic people are more likely to engage in protest; (2) more trusting respondents are more likely to engage in protest; (3) the relationship between trust and protest differ among active group members, non-active group members, and non-members; and (4) the association between trust and protest and between altruism and protest will differ between low- and high-cost protests. Estimates using binary logistic regression suggest that sex, group membership, political interest, and consumption of certain types of media consistently predict participation in protest. In addition, there is also evidence that factors that predict high-cost protest action do not predict low-cost protest action. Lastly, trust and system justification were also found to predict protest but in directions opposite those established by previous research.","PeriodicalId":53551,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Political Science Journal","volume":"39 1","pages":"155 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01154451.2018.1565641","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of participation in protest in the Philippines\",\"authors\":\"Francis Joseph A. Dee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01154451.2018.1565641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Social movement theory links protest to psychological (grievance, system justification, uncertainty salience), strategic (costs, trust, norms), resource-based (sex, age, income, group membership, political interest, media consumption), and structural (political opportunity structures) predictors. This paper answers the question, “Why do people protest in the Philippines?” by assessing whether these variables predict protest in the Philippines using data from the 2012 World Values Survey. Specifically, it tests the following hypotheses: (1) more altruistic people are more likely to engage in protest; (2) more trusting respondents are more likely to engage in protest; (3) the relationship between trust and protest differ among active group members, non-active group members, and non-members; and (4) the association between trust and protest and between altruism and protest will differ between low- and high-cost protests. Estimates using binary logistic regression suggest that sex, group membership, political interest, and consumption of certain types of media consistently predict participation in protest. In addition, there is also evidence that factors that predict high-cost protest action do not predict low-cost protest action. Lastly, trust and system justification were also found to predict protest but in directions opposite those established by previous research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philippine Political Science Journal\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"155 - 178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01154451.2018.1565641\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philippine Political Science Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.2018.1565641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Political Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.2018.1565641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要社会运动理论将抗议与心理(不满、制度正当性、不确定性显著性)、战略(成本、信任、规范)、资源(性别、年龄、收入、群体成员、政治兴趣、媒体消费)和结构(政治机会结构)预测因素联系起来。本文通过使用2012年世界价值观调查的数据评估这些变量是否预测了菲律宾的抗议活动,回答了“人们为什么在菲律宾抗议?”的问题。具体而言,它检验了以下假设:(1)无私的人更有可能参与抗议;(2) 更信任的受访者更有可能参与抗议;(3) 信任与抗议的关系在活跃群体成员、非活跃群体成员和非活跃群体中存在差异;(4)信任与抗议、利他主义与抗议之间的联系在低成本抗议和高成本抗议之间会有所不同。使用二元逻辑回归的估计表明,性别、团体成员、政治利益和对某些类型媒体的消费一致预测了抗议活动的参与。此外,还有证据表明,预测高成本抗议行动的因素并不能预测低成本抗议行动。最后,信任和制度正当性也被发现可以预测抗议,但方向与之前的研究相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of participation in protest in the Philippines
ABSTRACT Social movement theory links protest to psychological (grievance, system justification, uncertainty salience), strategic (costs, trust, norms), resource-based (sex, age, income, group membership, political interest, media consumption), and structural (political opportunity structures) predictors. This paper answers the question, “Why do people protest in the Philippines?” by assessing whether these variables predict protest in the Philippines using data from the 2012 World Values Survey. Specifically, it tests the following hypotheses: (1) more altruistic people are more likely to engage in protest; (2) more trusting respondents are more likely to engage in protest; (3) the relationship between trust and protest differ among active group members, non-active group members, and non-members; and (4) the association between trust and protest and between altruism and protest will differ between low- and high-cost protests. Estimates using binary logistic regression suggest that sex, group membership, political interest, and consumption of certain types of media consistently predict participation in protest. In addition, there is also evidence that factors that predict high-cost protest action do not predict low-cost protest action. Lastly, trust and system justification were also found to predict protest but in directions opposite those established by previous research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Philippine Political Science Journal
Philippine Political Science Journal Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Philippine Political Science Journal (PPSJ) is an internationally refereed journal and the official publication of the Philippine Political Science Association (PPSA). The PPSJ welcomes articles dealing with the politics and international relations of Southeast Asia. Manuscripts may focus on individual countries of the region but comparative articles about the countries in the region and the region as a whole are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Digital Innovations during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Facebook Use for Local E-Governance in the Province of South Cotabato Substantive Representation of Women in Asian Parliaments, edited by Devin K. Joshi and Christian Echle The Invention of China, written by Bill Hayton Politics versus Preparedness? How Electoral Incentives Affect the Provision of Local Disaster Public Goods in the Philippines Taiwan During the First Administration of Tsai Ing-Wen: Navigating in Stormy Waters, edited by Gunter Schubert and Chun-Yi Lee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1