允许主动安乐死的法案

Q4 Social Sciences Prudentia Iuris Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.271-285
Eduardo A. Sambrizzi
{"title":"允许主动安乐死的法案","authors":"Eduardo A. Sambrizzi","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.271-285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The recent bill presented to the National Congress in Argentina, seeks the legalization of euthanasia, basing mainly on the fact that such an action would allow the access of persons covered by the law to a dignified death. Here it is exposed how the inherent dignity of all human beings is enough to condemn euthanasia, resulting inadmissible ethical approaches that seek to legalize the end of a person in a provoked manner. Although the protection of life should not justify practices known as therapeutic cruelty, this does not imply that euthanasia provides a true solution to the problem of human suffering. Following the aforementioned considerations, the main points of the bill are briefly explained below.","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Un Proyecto de ley que admite la eutanasia activa\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo A. Sambrizzi\",\"doi\":\"10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.271-285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": The recent bill presented to the National Congress in Argentina, seeks the legalization of euthanasia, basing mainly on the fact that such an action would allow the access of persons covered by the law to a dignified death. Here it is exposed how the inherent dignity of all human beings is enough to condemn euthanasia, resulting inadmissible ethical approaches that seek to legalize the end of a person in a provoked manner. Although the protection of life should not justify practices known as therapeutic cruelty, this does not imply that euthanasia provides a true solution to the problem of human suffering. Following the aforementioned considerations, the main points of the bill are briefly explained below.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prudentia Iuris\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prudentia Iuris\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.271-285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prudentia Iuris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.271-285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

*最近向阿根廷国民议会提交的法案寻求使安乐死合法化,主要基于这样一个事实,即安乐死将使法律所涵盖的人能够有尊严地死亡。这里揭示了人类固有的尊严如何足以谴责安乐死,导致不可接受的伦理方法,试图以一种被激怒的方式将一个人的死亡合法化。尽管保护生命不应该成为残忍治疗的正当理由,但这并不意味着安乐死是解决人类痛苦问题的真正方法。根据上述考虑,现将条例草案的要点简述如下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Un Proyecto de ley que admite la eutanasia activa
: The recent bill presented to the National Congress in Argentina, seeks the legalization of euthanasia, basing mainly on the fact that such an action would allow the access of persons covered by the law to a dignified death. Here it is exposed how the inherent dignity of all human beings is enough to condemn euthanasia, resulting inadmissible ethical approaches that seek to legalize the end of a person in a provoked manner. Although the protection of life should not justify practices known as therapeutic cruelty, this does not imply that euthanasia provides a true solution to the problem of human suffering. Following the aforementioned considerations, the main points of the bill are briefly explained below.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prudentia Iuris
Prudentia Iuris Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
La familia como fundamento del Estado Constitucional. Una investigación pretendidamente radical Comisión por omisión y causalidad La jurisprudencia en una economía con tipo de cambio múltiple. El caso de Argentina 2020-2023. ¿Francisco de Vitoria ideólogo del imperialismo? Revisión crítica de algunas interpretaciones recientes. La vigencia del derecho natural en el derecho positivo de todas las comunidades
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1