《环境紧急状态的构成》,Jocelyn Stacey著

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL Pub Date : 2021-01-14 DOI:10.60082/2817-5069.3593
G. Reeder
{"title":"《环境紧急状态的构成》,Jocelyn Stacey著","authors":"G. Reeder","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jocelyn Stacey’s The Constitution of the Environmental Emergency is a unique text in the area of environmental law. It argues for reframing environmental law from the premise that environmental issues confront lawmakers as emergencies that are impossible to reliably predict. Stacey relies on a constructive tension between two somewhat overlapping theories of legitimate government action: common law constitutionalism and deliberative democracy. When Stacey argues that environmental issues constitute emergencies, she shows how lawmakers are confronted with problems that entail “deep uncertainty where the possibility of a catastrophe cannot be reliably eliminated in advance.” This approach allows her to draw on insights from scholarship on emergencies and the rule of law to reimagine the purpose and orientation of environmental law, namely the centrality of having government institutions publicly justify important decisions. This book review is available in Osgoode Hall Law Journal: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol57/ iss1/8","PeriodicalId":45757,"journal":{"name":"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Constitution of the Environmental Emergency, by Jocelyn Stacey\",\"authors\":\"G. Reeder\",\"doi\":\"10.60082/2817-5069.3593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Jocelyn Stacey’s The Constitution of the Environmental Emergency is a unique text in the area of environmental law. It argues for reframing environmental law from the premise that environmental issues confront lawmakers as emergencies that are impossible to reliably predict. Stacey relies on a constructive tension between two somewhat overlapping theories of legitimate government action: common law constitutionalism and deliberative democracy. When Stacey argues that environmental issues constitute emergencies, she shows how lawmakers are confronted with problems that entail “deep uncertainty where the possibility of a catastrophe cannot be reliably eliminated in advance.” This approach allows her to draw on insights from scholarship on emergencies and the rule of law to reimagine the purpose and orientation of environmental law, namely the centrality of having government institutions publicly justify important decisions. This book review is available in Osgoode Hall Law Journal: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol57/ iss1/8\",\"PeriodicalId\":45757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.3593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.3593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乔斯林·斯泰西的《环境紧急状态宪法》是环境法领域的一部独特著作。它主张重新制定环境法的前提是,环境问题是立法者无法可靠预测的紧急情况。斯泰西依赖于两种有些重叠的合法政府行为理论之间的建设性张力:普通法宪政和协商民主。当斯泰西认为环境问题构成紧急情况时,她展示了立法者是如何面对这些问题的,这些问题包含“严重的不确定性,在这种情况下,灾难的可能性无法事先可靠地消除”。这种方法使她能够借鉴关于紧急情况和法治的学术见解,重新构想环境法的目的和方向,即让政府机构公开为重要决策辩护的中心地位。这篇书评可以在Osgoode Hall Law Journal上找到:https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol57/ iss1/8
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Constitution of the Environmental Emergency, by Jocelyn Stacey
Jocelyn Stacey’s The Constitution of the Environmental Emergency is a unique text in the area of environmental law. It argues for reframing environmental law from the premise that environmental issues confront lawmakers as emergencies that are impossible to reliably predict. Stacey relies on a constructive tension between two somewhat overlapping theories of legitimate government action: common law constitutionalism and deliberative democracy. When Stacey argues that environmental issues constitute emergencies, she shows how lawmakers are confronted with problems that entail “deep uncertainty where the possibility of a catastrophe cannot be reliably eliminated in advance.” This approach allows her to draw on insights from scholarship on emergencies and the rule of law to reimagine the purpose and orientation of environmental law, namely the centrality of having government institutions publicly justify important decisions. This book review is available in Osgoode Hall Law Journal: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol57/ iss1/8
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Provincial Constitutions, the Amending Formula, and Unilateral Amendments to the Constitution of Canada: An Analysis of Quebec’s Bill 96 Peace and Good Order: The Case for Indigenous Justice in Canada by Harold R. Johnson The Elusive Motive Requirement in Canada’s Terrorism Offences: Defining and Distinguishing Ideology, Religion, and Politics Policing in the Shadow of Legality: Pretext, Leveraging, and Investigation Cascades No Legal Way Out: R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress by Nadia Verrelli and Lori Chambers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1