{"title":"神的道和其中的万物","authors":"A. Freadman","doi":"10.1080/20512856.2018.1499334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The paper argues that the study of language in literature springs from the ancient discipline of philology which, far from having disappeared with the advent of modern theory, persists both in its repressions and in its techniques. It makes this argument in three parts, a polemic bearing on the temporality of philology, and two exercises each of which seeks to illustrate two of these techniques.","PeriodicalId":40530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Literature and Culture","volume":"65 1","pages":"117 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20512856.2018.1499334","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Word and All Things in it\",\"authors\":\"A. Freadman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20512856.2018.1499334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The paper argues that the study of language in literature springs from the ancient discipline of philology which, far from having disappeared with the advent of modern theory, persists both in its repressions and in its techniques. It makes this argument in three parts, a polemic bearing on the temporality of philology, and two exercises each of which seeks to illustrate two of these techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language Literature and Culture\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"117 - 133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20512856.2018.1499334\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language Literature and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20512856.2018.1499334\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20512856.2018.1499334","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT The paper argues that the study of language in literature springs from the ancient discipline of philology which, far from having disappeared with the advent of modern theory, persists both in its repressions and in its techniques. It makes this argument in three parts, a polemic bearing on the temporality of philology, and two exercises each of which seeks to illustrate two of these techniques.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
