迭代重建技术对低辐射剂量胸部CT图像质量的影响:一项体模研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI:10.5152/dir.2019.18539
Yan Xu, Ting-ting Zhang, Zhihai Hu, Juan Li, Hong-jun Hou, Zu-shan Xu, Wen He
{"title":"迭代重建技术对低辐射剂量胸部CT图像质量的影响:一项体模研究。","authors":"Yan Xu, Ting-ting Zhang, Zhihai Hu, Juan Li, Hong-jun Hou, Zu-shan Xu, Wen He","doi":"10.5152/dir.2019.18539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nTo evaluate the quality of chest CT images obtained with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) using three iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms.\n\n\nMETHODS\nTwo 64-detector spiral CT scanners (HDCT, iCT) were used to scan a chest phantom containing 6 ground-glass nodules (GGNs) at 11 radiation dose levels. CT images were reconstructed by FBP or three IR algorithms. Reconstructed images were analyzed for CT values, average noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values, subjective image noise, and diagnostic acceptability of the GGNs. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for statistical analyses.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAverage noise decreased and CNR increased with increasing radiation dose when the same reconstruction algorithm was applied. Image average noise reconstructed with MBIR was significantly lower than reconstructed with iDOSE4 at the same low radiation doses. The two radiologists showed good interobserver consistency in image quality with kappa 0.83. A significant relationship was found between image noise and diagnostic acceptability of the GGNs.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThree IR algorithms are able to reduce the image noise and improve the image quality in LDCT. In the same radiation dose, the LDCT images quality reconstructed with MBIR algorithms is better than that of other IR algorithms.","PeriodicalId":50582,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5152/dir.2019.18539","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality in low radiation dose chest CT: a phantom study.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Xu, Ting-ting Zhang, Zhihai Hu, Juan Li, Hong-jun Hou, Zu-shan Xu, Wen He\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/dir.2019.18539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\nTo evaluate the quality of chest CT images obtained with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) using three iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nTwo 64-detector spiral CT scanners (HDCT, iCT) were used to scan a chest phantom containing 6 ground-glass nodules (GGNs) at 11 radiation dose levels. CT images were reconstructed by FBP or three IR algorithms. Reconstructed images were analyzed for CT values, average noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values, subjective image noise, and diagnostic acceptability of the GGNs. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for statistical analyses.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nAverage noise decreased and CNR increased with increasing radiation dose when the same reconstruction algorithm was applied. Image average noise reconstructed with MBIR was significantly lower than reconstructed with iDOSE4 at the same low radiation doses. The two radiologists showed good interobserver consistency in image quality with kappa 0.83. A significant relationship was found between image noise and diagnostic acceptability of the GGNs.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThree IR algorithms are able to reduce the image noise and improve the image quality in LDCT. In the same radiation dose, the LDCT images quality reconstructed with MBIR algorithms is better than that of other IR algorithms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5152/dir.2019.18539\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2019.18539\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2019.18539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

目的使用三种迭代重建(IR)算法评估低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)获得的胸部CT图像的质量。方法采用两台64探测器螺旋CT扫描仪(HDCT,iCT)在11个辐射剂量水平下扫描一个包含6个磨玻璃结节(GGN)的胸部模型。CT图像采用FBP或三种IR算法重建。分析重建图像的CT值、平均噪声、对比噪声比(CNR)值、主观图像噪声和GGN的诊断可接受性。重复测量方差分析用于统计分析。结果当采用相同的重建算法时,随着辐射剂量的增加,平均噪声降低,CNR增加。在相同的低辐射剂量下,用MBIR重建的图像平均噪声显著低于用iDOSE4重建的图像。两位放射科医生在图像质量方面显示出良好的观察者间一致性,kappa为0.83。图像噪声与GGNs的诊断可接受性之间存在显著关系。结论三种IR算法能够降低图像噪声,提高LDCT的图像质量。在相同辐射剂量下,MBIR算法重建的LDCT图像质量优于其他IR算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality in low radiation dose chest CT: a phantom study.
PURPOSE To evaluate the quality of chest CT images obtained with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) using three iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms. METHODS Two 64-detector spiral CT scanners (HDCT, iCT) were used to scan a chest phantom containing 6 ground-glass nodules (GGNs) at 11 radiation dose levels. CT images were reconstructed by FBP or three IR algorithms. Reconstructed images were analyzed for CT values, average noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values, subjective image noise, and diagnostic acceptability of the GGNs. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS Average noise decreased and CNR increased with increasing radiation dose when the same reconstruction algorithm was applied. Image average noise reconstructed with MBIR was significantly lower than reconstructed with iDOSE4 at the same low radiation doses. The two radiologists showed good interobserver consistency in image quality with kappa 0.83. A significant relationship was found between image noise and diagnostic acceptability of the GGNs. CONCLUSION Three IR algorithms are able to reduce the image noise and improve the image quality in LDCT. In the same radiation dose, the LDCT images quality reconstructed with MBIR algorithms is better than that of other IR algorithms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
期刊最新文献
Application of deep learning and radiomics in the prediction of hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage: a fully automated hybrid approach. Diagnostic value of qualitative and quantitative enhancement parameters on contrast-enhanced mammography. Post-contrast abdominal magnetic resonance imaging of critically ill patients using compressed sensing free-breathing golden radial angle imaging. The effect of MWA protocols upon morphology and IVIM parameters of hepatic ablation zones-a preliminary in vivo animal study with an MRI-compatible microwave ablation device. Percutaneous sclerotherapy using a 4 F pigtail catheter and 40 milliliters of 5% ethanolamine oleate for symptomatic large hepatic cysts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1