承认监狱中的人的尊严:监狱大学项目的道德理由

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Theory and Research in Education Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1177/14778785221102035
John P. Fantuzzo
{"title":"承认监狱中的人的尊严:监狱大学项目的道德理由","authors":"John P. Fantuzzo","doi":"10.1177/14778785221102035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is currently bipartisan support for criminal justice reform in the United States. One reform, recently passed through the Consolidated Appropriations Act/COVID relief package (December 2020), restored need-based, higher educational aid for incarcerated persons. With a resurgence of college-in-prison programs on the horizon, this article joins recent efforts to understand the moral justification of these programs not exclusively in terms of reductions in recidivism rates but in terms of a duty-based recognition of human dignity. It contributes to these efforts by examining the meaning and implications of recognizing human dignity behind bars, contending that the achievements of college-in-prison programs are morally justified insofar as they provide a model for recognizing the human dignity of all incarcerated persons (not just the select few they educate) and thereby spur the transformation of an institution that systematically ignores the role of human dignity in our moral lives.","PeriodicalId":46679,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Research in Education","volume":"20 1","pages":"26 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recognizing human dignity behind bars: A moral justification for college-in-prison programs\",\"authors\":\"John P. Fantuzzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14778785221102035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is currently bipartisan support for criminal justice reform in the United States. One reform, recently passed through the Consolidated Appropriations Act/COVID relief package (December 2020), restored need-based, higher educational aid for incarcerated persons. With a resurgence of college-in-prison programs on the horizon, this article joins recent efforts to understand the moral justification of these programs not exclusively in terms of reductions in recidivism rates but in terms of a duty-based recognition of human dignity. It contributes to these efforts by examining the meaning and implications of recognizing human dignity behind bars, contending that the achievements of college-in-prison programs are morally justified insofar as they provide a model for recognizing the human dignity of all incarcerated persons (not just the select few they educate) and thereby spur the transformation of an institution that systematically ignores the role of human dignity in our moral lives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Research in Education\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"26 - 43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Research in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785221102035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785221102035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,两党都支持美国的刑事司法改革。最近通过的一项改革是《综合拨款法》/新冠肺炎救助计划(2020年12月),恢复了对被监禁者的基于需求的高等教育援助。随着监狱中大学项目的复兴,本文加入了最近的努力,以理解这些项目的道德合理性,不仅从降低累犯率的角度,而且从基于职责的对人类尊严的承认的角度。它通过研究在狱中承认人的尊严的意义和影响,为这些努力做出了贡献,认为监狱中大学项目的成就在道德上是合理的,因为它们为承认所有被监禁者(而不仅仅是他们所教育的少数人)的人格尊严提供了一个模式,从而推动了一个系统地忽视人格尊严在我们道德生活中作用的制度的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recognizing human dignity behind bars: A moral justification for college-in-prison programs
There is currently bipartisan support for criminal justice reform in the United States. One reform, recently passed through the Consolidated Appropriations Act/COVID relief package (December 2020), restored need-based, higher educational aid for incarcerated persons. With a resurgence of college-in-prison programs on the horizon, this article joins recent efforts to understand the moral justification of these programs not exclusively in terms of reductions in recidivism rates but in terms of a duty-based recognition of human dignity. It contributes to these efforts by examining the meaning and implications of recognizing human dignity behind bars, contending that the achievements of college-in-prison programs are morally justified insofar as they provide a model for recognizing the human dignity of all incarcerated persons (not just the select few they educate) and thereby spur the transformation of an institution that systematically ignores the role of human dignity in our moral lives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theory and Research in Education
Theory and Research in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Theory and Research in Education, formerly known as The School Field, is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes theoretical, empirical and conjectural papers contributing to the development of educational theory, policy and practice.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Julian Culp, Johannes Drerup and Douglas Yacek (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Democratic Education Education for deliberative democracy through the long-term view Education for flourishing: A social contract for foundational competencies Book review: Barbara S Stengel, Responsibility: Philosophy of Education in Practice How much is too much? Refining normative evaluations of prescriptive curriculum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1