双语对青年汉英双语者的认知控制有影响,而非双方言

IF 1.3 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS International Journal of Bilingualism Pub Date : 2023-06-22 DOI:10.1177/13670069231181254
Zhilong Xie, Qianyun Zhong
{"title":"双语对青年汉英双语者的认知控制有影响,而非双方言","authors":"Zhilong Xie, Qianyun Zhong","doi":"10.1177/13670069231181254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates whether bilingualism and bidialectalism influence cognitive control, and whether the two variables interact. The study compared two matched groups differing in second language (L2) proficiency through the Flanker and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). The two groups were further divided into four groups differing in dialect proficiency, so that the effects of L2 proficiency and dialect proficiency and the interactive effect were examined. A mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to the Flanker task data, with the task condition as the within-subject variable and the participant group as the between-subject variable. Independent t-test and ANOVA analyses were used to compare the performance differences between groups on the WCST. The high L2 proficiency group performed better than the low L2 proficiency group both in the Flanker task and the WCST, reflecting better monitoring and shifting ability. L2 proficiency effect on cognitive control was significant. However, no dialect effect was observed, and no interaction effect was found. Further multiple regression results confirmed the role of L2 proficiency but not dialect proficiency. This is one of the first bilingual studies to incorporate both bilingualism and bidialectalism simultaneously. The current research provides robust evidence that bilingualism is related to the enhancement of cognitive control, but questions the effect of bidialectalism.","PeriodicalId":47574,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bilingualism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bilingualism but not bidialectalism influences cognitive control among young adult Chinese–English bilinguals\",\"authors\":\"Zhilong Xie, Qianyun Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13670069231181254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates whether bilingualism and bidialectalism influence cognitive control, and whether the two variables interact. The study compared two matched groups differing in second language (L2) proficiency through the Flanker and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). The two groups were further divided into four groups differing in dialect proficiency, so that the effects of L2 proficiency and dialect proficiency and the interactive effect were examined. A mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to the Flanker task data, with the task condition as the within-subject variable and the participant group as the between-subject variable. Independent t-test and ANOVA analyses were used to compare the performance differences between groups on the WCST. The high L2 proficiency group performed better than the low L2 proficiency group both in the Flanker task and the WCST, reflecting better monitoring and shifting ability. L2 proficiency effect on cognitive control was significant. However, no dialect effect was observed, and no interaction effect was found. Further multiple regression results confirmed the role of L2 proficiency but not dialect proficiency. This is one of the first bilingual studies to incorporate both bilingualism and bidialectalism simultaneously. The current research provides robust evidence that bilingualism is related to the enhancement of cognitive control, but questions the effect of bidialectalism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Bilingualism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Bilingualism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069231181254\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bilingualism","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069231181254","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了双语和双语是否影响认知控制,以及这两个变量是否相互作用。该研究通过Flanker和Wisconsin卡片分类测试(WCST)比较了两组在第二语言(L2)熟练程度上不同的匹配组。两组被进一步分为方言熟练程度不同的四组,以检验二语熟练程度和方言熟练程度的影响以及互动效应。将混合方差分析(ANOVA)应用于Flanker任务数据,任务条件作为受试者内部变量,参与者组作为受试对象之间变量。使用独立t检验和方差分析来比较各组在WCST上的表现差异。在Flanker任务和WCST中,高L2水平组的表现都优于低L2水平组,反映出更好的监控和转换能力。二语水平对认知控制的影响显著。然而,没有观察到方言效应,也没有发现互动效应。进一步的多元回归结果证实了二语水平的作用,但没有证实方言水平的作用。这是第一个同时包含双语和双语的双语研究。目前的研究提供了强有力的证据,证明双语与认知控制的增强有关,但对双语的影响提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bilingualism but not bidialectalism influences cognitive control among young adult Chinese–English bilinguals
This study investigates whether bilingualism and bidialectalism influence cognitive control, and whether the two variables interact. The study compared two matched groups differing in second language (L2) proficiency through the Flanker and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). The two groups were further divided into four groups differing in dialect proficiency, so that the effects of L2 proficiency and dialect proficiency and the interactive effect were examined. A mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to the Flanker task data, with the task condition as the within-subject variable and the participant group as the between-subject variable. Independent t-test and ANOVA analyses were used to compare the performance differences between groups on the WCST. The high L2 proficiency group performed better than the low L2 proficiency group both in the Flanker task and the WCST, reflecting better monitoring and shifting ability. L2 proficiency effect on cognitive control was significant. However, no dialect effect was observed, and no interaction effect was found. Further multiple regression results confirmed the role of L2 proficiency but not dialect proficiency. This is one of the first bilingual studies to incorporate both bilingualism and bidialectalism simultaneously. The current research provides robust evidence that bilingualism is related to the enhancement of cognitive control, but questions the effect of bidialectalism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Bilingualism is an international forum for the dissemination of original research on the linguistic, psychological, neurological, and social issues which emerge from language contact. While stressing interdisciplinary links, the focus of the Journal is on the language behavior of the bi- and multilingual individual.
期刊最新文献
Predicting language dominance in Spanish/English bilingual adults based on relative speech-in-speech recognition scores. Limited input and the acquisition of Finnish: The evolution of a child speaker in a multilingual environment Relative clause attachment preferences of late bilinguals Relations among degree of bilingualism and bilateral information processing in children and adults Dual drivers of bilingual semantic accent: Semantic relations and input limitations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1