政党声誉与品牌管理:加拿大选举候选人的党内审查

Alex Marland, Brooks DeCillia
{"title":"政党声誉与品牌管理:加拿大选举候选人的党内审查","authors":"Alex Marland, Brooks DeCillia","doi":"10.1080/10495142.2020.1798857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A political party is keen to jettison anyone who could plunge it into crisis, cost it votes, harm its reputation and damage its brand. Association with election candidates is particularly high risk because of the high stakes of an election campaign. As part of their reputation and brand management, party officials can screen aspiring candidates before local party members do so. Little is known about these pre-selection methods. We examine the lengthy, invasive screening questionnaires and secretive processes that Canadian political parties use to assess potential candidates. We show that parties probe for edgy remarks, controversial activities, intolerant attitudes and unlawful conduct. Vetting pays special attention to social media. We explain that the phenomenon responds to the growth of digital content, media interest in controversy and the turmoil sparked by opposition research. We then consider normative implications associated with media and democracy.","PeriodicalId":46735,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","volume":"32 1","pages":"342 - 363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10495142.2020.1798857","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reputation and Brand Management by Political Parties: Party Vetting of Election Candidates in Canada\",\"authors\":\"Alex Marland, Brooks DeCillia\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10495142.2020.1798857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT A political party is keen to jettison anyone who could plunge it into crisis, cost it votes, harm its reputation and damage its brand. Association with election candidates is particularly high risk because of the high stakes of an election campaign. As part of their reputation and brand management, party officials can screen aspiring candidates before local party members do so. Little is known about these pre-selection methods. We examine the lengthy, invasive screening questionnaires and secretive processes that Canadian political parties use to assess potential candidates. We show that parties probe for edgy remarks, controversial activities, intolerant attitudes and unlawful conduct. Vetting pays special attention to social media. We explain that the phenomenon responds to the growth of digital content, media interest in controversy and the turmoil sparked by opposition research. We then consider normative implications associated with media and democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"342 - 363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10495142.2020.1798857\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2020.1798857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2020.1798857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要一个政党热衷于抛弃任何可能使其陷入危机、失去选票、损害声誉和损害品牌的人。与选举候选人交往的风险特别高,因为竞选活动的风险很高。作为声誉和品牌管理的一部分,党的官员可以在当地党员之前筛选有抱负的候选人。人们对这些预选方法知之甚少。我们研究了加拿大政党用来评估潜在候选人的冗长、侵入性的筛选问卷和秘密程序。我们展示了政党对尖锐言论、有争议的活动、不宽容的态度和非法行为的调查。Vetting特别关注社交媒体。我们解释说,这种现象是由于数字内容的增长、媒体对争议的兴趣以及反对派研究引发的动荡。然后,我们考虑与媒体和民主相关的规范性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reputation and Brand Management by Political Parties: Party Vetting of Election Candidates in Canada
ABSTRACT A political party is keen to jettison anyone who could plunge it into crisis, cost it votes, harm its reputation and damage its brand. Association with election candidates is particularly high risk because of the high stakes of an election campaign. As part of their reputation and brand management, party officials can screen aspiring candidates before local party members do so. Little is known about these pre-selection methods. We examine the lengthy, invasive screening questionnaires and secretive processes that Canadian political parties use to assess potential candidates. We show that parties probe for edgy remarks, controversial activities, intolerant attitudes and unlawful conduct. Vetting pays special attention to social media. We explain that the phenomenon responds to the growth of digital content, media interest in controversy and the turmoil sparked by opposition research. We then consider normative implications associated with media and democracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Conceptualizing Barriers to Individual Recycling: A Qualitative Study with Multiple Stakeholders in Türkiye Nonprofits, Social Media, and Mission Sympathy and Guilt: Optimizing Advertising Appeals for Charitable Giving to Generation Z Do Top managers’ Psychological Attributes Influence Nonprofit Alliances for Resource Acquisition? An Application of Stimulus-Organization-Behavior-Consequence (S-O-B-C) Theory Using Social Media as a Marketing Communication Strategy: Perspectives from Health-Related Non-Profit Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1