那么,在柬埔寨有教学研究关系吗?来自一所公立大学EFL学生的证据

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Post-Compulsory Education Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/13596748.2023.2166692
Davut Nhem
{"title":"那么,在柬埔寨有教学研究关系吗?来自一所公立大学EFL学生的证据","authors":"Davut Nhem","doi":"10.1080/13596748.2023.2166692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Teaching-research nexus has become a hotspot topic of scholarly debates in the higher education field for decades, owing to the contesting views of intellectuals and the polarisation of empirical evidence reported from many higher education spaces. Sadly, previous studies have been mainly conducted in societies with well-developed research culture – meaning this area of inquiry remains baffling in many other higher education settings, especially the teaching-oriented ones. Thus, this study analyzes quantitative and qualitative data from 232 students who responded to an online survey and eight who participated in interviews at one long-standing public university in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, where academics’ dedication to teaching duties is typically treasured. The results indicate patchy connections between teaching and research not only at the institutional level but also at the classroom level. In particular, the results reveal that the teaching-research nexus appears more evidently in the form of research-skill development, inquiry-based activities, and students’ current knowledge sharing. Conversely, cutting-edge knowledge is far from being visible in the teaching-learning space. This invisibility is possibly the concomitant of the academics’ unattractive engagement in knowledge production. Unfortunately, such loose connections also make students’ learning less exciting.","PeriodicalId":45169,"journal":{"name":"Research in Post-Compulsory Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"So, is there a teaching-research nexus in Cambodia? Evidence from EFL students at one public university\",\"authors\":\"Davut Nhem\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13596748.2023.2166692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Teaching-research nexus has become a hotspot topic of scholarly debates in the higher education field for decades, owing to the contesting views of intellectuals and the polarisation of empirical evidence reported from many higher education spaces. Sadly, previous studies have been mainly conducted in societies with well-developed research culture – meaning this area of inquiry remains baffling in many other higher education settings, especially the teaching-oriented ones. Thus, this study analyzes quantitative and qualitative data from 232 students who responded to an online survey and eight who participated in interviews at one long-standing public university in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, where academics’ dedication to teaching duties is typically treasured. The results indicate patchy connections between teaching and research not only at the institutional level but also at the classroom level. In particular, the results reveal that the teaching-research nexus appears more evidently in the form of research-skill development, inquiry-based activities, and students’ current knowledge sharing. Conversely, cutting-edge knowledge is far from being visible in the teaching-learning space. This invisibility is possibly the concomitant of the academics’ unattractive engagement in knowledge production. Unfortunately, such loose connections also make students’ learning less exciting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Post-Compulsory Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Post-Compulsory Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2023.2166692\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Post-Compulsory Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2023.2166692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要几十年来,由于知识分子观点的争论和来自许多高等教育领域的经验证据的两极分化,教学与研究的关系已成为高等教育领域学术辩论的热点。遗憾的是,以前的研究主要在研究文化发达的社会中进行,这意味着在许多其他高等教育环境中,尤其是以教学为导向的环境中,这一研究领域仍然令人困惑。因此,这项研究分析了232名学生的定量和定性数据,这些学生参加了一项在线调查,8名学生参加了柬埔寨金边一所历史悠久的公立大学的面试,那里的学者对教学职责的奉献精神通常很受珍视。研究结果表明,教学和研究之间的联系参差不齐,不仅在机构层面,而且在课堂层面。特别是,研究结果表明,教学与研究之间的联系以研究技能发展、探究活动和学生当前知识共享的形式表现得更为明显。相反,前沿知识在教学空间中远远看不到。这种隐形可能是伴随着学术界对知识生产缺乏吸引力的参与。不幸的是,这种松散的联系也使学生的学习不那么令人兴奋。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
So, is there a teaching-research nexus in Cambodia? Evidence from EFL students at one public university
ABSTRACT Teaching-research nexus has become a hotspot topic of scholarly debates in the higher education field for decades, owing to the contesting views of intellectuals and the polarisation of empirical evidence reported from many higher education spaces. Sadly, previous studies have been mainly conducted in societies with well-developed research culture – meaning this area of inquiry remains baffling in many other higher education settings, especially the teaching-oriented ones. Thus, this study analyzes quantitative and qualitative data from 232 students who responded to an online survey and eight who participated in interviews at one long-standing public university in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, where academics’ dedication to teaching duties is typically treasured. The results indicate patchy connections between teaching and research not only at the institutional level but also at the classroom level. In particular, the results reveal that the teaching-research nexus appears more evidently in the form of research-skill development, inquiry-based activities, and students’ current knowledge sharing. Conversely, cutting-edge knowledge is far from being visible in the teaching-learning space. This invisibility is possibly the concomitant of the academics’ unattractive engagement in knowledge production. Unfortunately, such loose connections also make students’ learning less exciting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Post-Compulsory Education
Research in Post-Compulsory Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Throughout the world, there is a growing awareness of the significance of vocational and post-compulsory education and training systems. The majority of countries are working hard to develop their provision, recognising the importance of post-compulsory education in providing educated and skilled people in sufficient numbers at appropriate levels to assist economic and social development. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, sponsored by the United Kingdom"s Further Education Research Association (FERA), recognises the need for more international research and analysis and the generation of relevant theory in order to identify policy needs and trends as well as priorities in this growing area.
期刊最新文献
College higher education commuter students’ experiences of belonging, mattering and persisting with their studies Voices from the deck: lecturers’ and middle managers’ perceptions of effective FE sector professional development In pursuit of equity vocational education and training and social justice Teaching practices that are conducive to supporting the positive emotional well-being of learners in post-compulsory education Teacher vulnerability in teacher identity in times of unexpected social change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1