民主危机——指什么角度?

Q3 Arts and Humanities Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.22613/zfpp/6.2.5
Sabrina Zucca-Soest
{"title":"民主危机——指什么角度?","authors":"Sabrina Zucca-Soest","doi":"10.22613/zfpp/6.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The so-called crisis of the democratic system which is currently discussed controversially deals with the basic question of the legitimacy of organized societies. Socially legitimizing processes are aimed at the definition and justification of democratic institutions. Those institutions can fulfill a regulating and therefore reassuring function within political systems. This is what defines their importance in today’s societies. Without the support through such regulating institutions, the social structure and organisational patterns dissolve and the democratic system falls in crisis. The question of any system’s legitimacy is therefore crucial for the structuring of all social processes and hierarchies – once a society reaches a status of legitimacy, it is considered as justified and recognized as such. Legitimized societies count as stable societies. The structures described above evolve through different social interactions and distinguish themselves by a mix of social and legal norms which are expected to be followed by all members of the society meant to be structured here. Following set norms is not implied here. Since the principle of following norms only for the sake of social adjustment is not only not acceptable but simply disfunctional, new structures ask for new reasons to justify and prove the legitimacy of the norms. Globalized societies seem to lack legitimations which is where the whole crisis is rooted which liberal-pluralistic are going through at the moment. The reservoir of nationalistic as well as liberal-pluralistic attempts of justification seems exhausted to the core. The following paper is trying to identify reasons for the current crisis of democracies as a concept. Moreover, it is analysing the basic idea of legitimation as a category of Sabrina Zucca-Soest 115 social functionality in depth. There are two basic principles. Depending on which is recognized by a society, different concepts of legitimation can be described. On an individual level, the individual’s recognition of established norms and its silent confirmation to act accordingly within a society can be understood as legitimation. On a societal level, the power that a society has over its members when imprinting core values and norms on them. Thus, two basic concepts of legitimation can be identified: The first one is based on facts to generate legitimation (descriptive approach). The second one is based on hypotheses (prescriptive approach). Only after the recognition of the theoretical background, reasons for the crises can be found, its scope can be measured and a realistic outlook on the necessary measures which need to be taken accordingly can be formulated.","PeriodicalId":53352,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Die Krise der Demokratie - Eine Frage der Perspektive?\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Zucca-Soest\",\"doi\":\"10.22613/zfpp/6.2.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The so-called crisis of the democratic system which is currently discussed controversially deals with the basic question of the legitimacy of organized societies. Socially legitimizing processes are aimed at the definition and justification of democratic institutions. Those institutions can fulfill a regulating and therefore reassuring function within political systems. This is what defines their importance in today’s societies. Without the support through such regulating institutions, the social structure and organisational patterns dissolve and the democratic system falls in crisis. The question of any system’s legitimacy is therefore crucial for the structuring of all social processes and hierarchies – once a society reaches a status of legitimacy, it is considered as justified and recognized as such. Legitimized societies count as stable societies. The structures described above evolve through different social interactions and distinguish themselves by a mix of social and legal norms which are expected to be followed by all members of the society meant to be structured here. Following set norms is not implied here. Since the principle of following norms only for the sake of social adjustment is not only not acceptable but simply disfunctional, new structures ask for new reasons to justify and prove the legitimacy of the norms. Globalized societies seem to lack legitimations which is where the whole crisis is rooted which liberal-pluralistic are going through at the moment. The reservoir of nationalistic as well as liberal-pluralistic attempts of justification seems exhausted to the core. The following paper is trying to identify reasons for the current crisis of democracies as a concept. Moreover, it is analysing the basic idea of legitimation as a category of Sabrina Zucca-Soest 115 social functionality in depth. There are two basic principles. Depending on which is recognized by a society, different concepts of legitimation can be described. On an individual level, the individual’s recognition of established norms and its silent confirmation to act accordingly within a society can be understood as legitimation. On a societal level, the power that a society has over its members when imprinting core values and norms on them. Thus, two basic concepts of legitimation can be identified: The first one is based on facts to generate legitimation (descriptive approach). The second one is based on hypotheses (prescriptive approach). Only after the recognition of the theoretical background, reasons for the crises can be found, its scope can be measured and a realistic outlook on the necessary measures which need to be taken accordingly can be formulated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22613/zfpp/6.2.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22613/zfpp/6.2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前正在争论的所谓民主制度危机涉及有组织社会合法性的基本问题。社会合法化进程的目的是为民主制度下定义和辩护。这些机构可以在政治制度内履行调节从而使人安心的职能。这就是它们在当今社会的重要性。没有这种调节机构的支持,社会结构和组织模式就会瓦解,民主制度就会陷入危机。因此,任何制度的合法性问题对于所有社会进程和等级制度的结构都是至关重要的- -一旦一个社会达到合法性的地位,它就被认为是正当的,并得到承认。合法化的社会算是稳定的社会。上面描述的结构通过不同的社会互动而演变,并通过社会和法律规范的混合来区分自己,这些规范被期望为这里所构建的所有社会成员所遵循。这里并不暗示要遵循既定的规范。由于仅仅为了社会调整而遵循规范的原则不仅不可接受,而且根本不起作用,新的结构需要新的理由来证明和证明规范的合法性。全球化的社会似乎缺乏合法性,而这正是当前自由多元主义正在经历的整个危机的根源所在。民族主义和自由多元主义的辩护尝试似乎已经耗尽了核心。下面的文章试图找出当前民主危机作为一个概念的原因。此外,本文还对正当性作为萨布丽娜·祖卡-苏斯特115社会功能范畴的基本思想进行了深入分析。有两个基本原则。根据一个社会所认可的合法性,可以描述不同的合法化概念。在个人层面上,个人对既定规范的认可及其在社会中相应地采取行动的沉默确认可以被理解为合法化。在社会层面上,一个社会对其成员施加核心价值观和规范的权力。因此,可以确定两个基本的正当性概念:第一个是基于事实来产生正当性(描述性方法)。第二种方法是基于假设(规定性方法)。只有认清理论背景,才能找到危机发生的原因,才能衡量危机的范围,才能对需要采取的必要措施有一个现实的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Die Krise der Demokratie - Eine Frage der Perspektive?
The so-called crisis of the democratic system which is currently discussed controversially deals with the basic question of the legitimacy of organized societies. Socially legitimizing processes are aimed at the definition and justification of democratic institutions. Those institutions can fulfill a regulating and therefore reassuring function within political systems. This is what defines their importance in today’s societies. Without the support through such regulating institutions, the social structure and organisational patterns dissolve and the democratic system falls in crisis. The question of any system’s legitimacy is therefore crucial for the structuring of all social processes and hierarchies – once a society reaches a status of legitimacy, it is considered as justified and recognized as such. Legitimized societies count as stable societies. The structures described above evolve through different social interactions and distinguish themselves by a mix of social and legal norms which are expected to be followed by all members of the society meant to be structured here. Following set norms is not implied here. Since the principle of following norms only for the sake of social adjustment is not only not acceptable but simply disfunctional, new structures ask for new reasons to justify and prove the legitimacy of the norms. Globalized societies seem to lack legitimations which is where the whole crisis is rooted which liberal-pluralistic are going through at the moment. The reservoir of nationalistic as well as liberal-pluralistic attempts of justification seems exhausted to the core. The following paper is trying to identify reasons for the current crisis of democracies as a concept. Moreover, it is analysing the basic idea of legitimation as a category of Sabrina Zucca-Soest 115 social functionality in depth. There are two basic principles. Depending on which is recognized by a society, different concepts of legitimation can be described. On an individual level, the individual’s recognition of established norms and its silent confirmation to act accordingly within a society can be understood as legitimation. On a societal level, the power that a society has over its members when imprinting core values and norms on them. Thus, two basic concepts of legitimation can be identified: The first one is based on facts to generate legitimation (descriptive approach). The second one is based on hypotheses (prescriptive approach). Only after the recognition of the theoretical background, reasons for the crises can be found, its scope can be measured and a realistic outlook on the necessary measures which need to be taken accordingly can be formulated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie
Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Dekoloniale Ethik und die Grenzen der Redefreiheit Gegenrede Verschwörungserzählungen im Kontext der Wissenschaftsleugnung Frei reden dürfen, aber es doch nicht sollen? Redefreiheit als Befähigung zur öffentlichen Rede
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1