药剂师主导的老年患者疗养院和门诊护理环境中非处方干预的有效性和成本效益:一项系统综述

Mohannad Alsallal, Nawal Alsubaiei, Ebrahim S Assiri, Abdullah, Amireh, A. Booth, Mostafa Kofi
{"title":"药剂师主导的老年患者疗养院和门诊护理环境中非处方干预的有效性和成本效益:一项系统综述","authors":"Mohannad Alsallal, Nawal Alsubaiei, Ebrahim S Assiri, Abdullah, Amireh, A. Booth, Mostafa Kofi","doi":"10.29011/2688-7460.100070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) are drugs in which the adverse risks exceed the clinical benefits, lacking evidence-based indications, potentially interact with other medications. PIM use is common in older adults who are frequently treated with multiple medications. PIM use in older adults is associated with many complications. Aim: To critically appraise and systematically evaluate the existing studies on the effectiveness of pharmacist-led deprescribing in health service utilization, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and cost utility. In nursing home and ambulatory care settings and patients aged 65 years and above. Methods: PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched between 1st to 2nd July 2021 and updated on 25th December 2021 to select studies that compare pharmacist-led deprescribing in nursing home and ambulatory care settings with usual care. Outcomes related to health service utilization, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and cost utility were evaluated. Results: A total of 3944 relevant records were identified through database searching. A further ten records were identified by following up citations and reference lists of the selected studies. After assessment, nine studies were included in the review. Four of the included studies reported outcomes relating to both health service utilization and clinical effectiveness, three studies reported only health service utilization, and the two economic studies reported cost effectiveness and cost utility respectively. Six out of seven studies that reported health service utilization outcomes found improvement in health service utilization after the implementation of the pharmacist-led deprescribing. However, there is no positive clinical effectiveness outcomes, and no worldwide studies for the economic outcomes. Conclusion: This evidence of moderate to high quality. Pharmacist-led deprescribing was effective only in reducing PIMs usage and medication burden for older adults in nursing home and ambulatory care setting, but with no clinical effectiveness outcomes. It is essential to evaluate the economic outcomes in different countries other than Canada (high-income county). Family Medicine and Primary Care: Open Access Alsallal M, et al. J Family Med Prim Care Open Acc 6: 170. www.doi.org/10.29011/2688-7460.100070 www.gavinpublishers.com Citation: Alsallal M, Alsubaiei N, Assiri E, Amireh A, Booth A, Kofi M (2022) Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacist-led Deprescribing Interventions in Nursing Homes and Ambulatory Care Settings in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review. J Family Med Prim Care Open Acc 6: 170. DOI: 10.29011/2688-7460.100070 2 Volume 6; Issue 01","PeriodicalId":93553,"journal":{"name":"Family medicine and primary care -- open access","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacist-led Deprescribing Interventions in Nursing Homes and Ambulatory Care Settings in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Mohannad Alsallal, Nawal Alsubaiei, Ebrahim S Assiri, Abdullah, Amireh, A. Booth, Mostafa Kofi\",\"doi\":\"10.29011/2688-7460.100070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) are drugs in which the adverse risks exceed the clinical benefits, lacking evidence-based indications, potentially interact with other medications. PIM use is common in older adults who are frequently treated with multiple medications. PIM use in older adults is associated with many complications. Aim: To critically appraise and systematically evaluate the existing studies on the effectiveness of pharmacist-led deprescribing in health service utilization, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and cost utility. In nursing home and ambulatory care settings and patients aged 65 years and above. Methods: PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched between 1st to 2nd July 2021 and updated on 25th December 2021 to select studies that compare pharmacist-led deprescribing in nursing home and ambulatory care settings with usual care. Outcomes related to health service utilization, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and cost utility were evaluated. Results: A total of 3944 relevant records were identified through database searching. A further ten records were identified by following up citations and reference lists of the selected studies. After assessment, nine studies were included in the review. Four of the included studies reported outcomes relating to both health service utilization and clinical effectiveness, three studies reported only health service utilization, and the two economic studies reported cost effectiveness and cost utility respectively. Six out of seven studies that reported health service utilization outcomes found improvement in health service utilization after the implementation of the pharmacist-led deprescribing. However, there is no positive clinical effectiveness outcomes, and no worldwide studies for the economic outcomes. Conclusion: This evidence of moderate to high quality. Pharmacist-led deprescribing was effective only in reducing PIMs usage and medication burden for older adults in nursing home and ambulatory care setting, but with no clinical effectiveness outcomes. It is essential to evaluate the economic outcomes in different countries other than Canada (high-income county). Family Medicine and Primary Care: Open Access Alsallal M, et al. J Family Med Prim Care Open Acc 6: 170. www.doi.org/10.29011/2688-7460.100070 www.gavinpublishers.com Citation: Alsallal M, Alsubaiei N, Assiri E, Amireh A, Booth A, Kofi M (2022) Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacist-led Deprescribing Interventions in Nursing Homes and Ambulatory Care Settings in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review. J Family Med Prim Care Open Acc 6: 170. DOI: 10.29011/2688-7460.100070 2 Volume 6; Issue 01\",\"PeriodicalId\":93553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family medicine and primary care -- open access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family medicine and primary care -- open access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29011/2688-7460.100070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family medicine and primary care -- open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2688-7460.100070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:潜在不适当药物(PIM)是指不良风险超过临床益处、缺乏循证适应症、可能与其他药物相互作用的药物。PIM的使用在经常接受多种药物治疗的老年人中很常见。老年人PIM的使用与许多并发症有关。目的:批判性地评价和系统地评价现有的药剂师主导的描述在医疗服务利用、临床有效性、成本效益和成本效用方面的有效性研究。在疗养院和门诊护理机构以及65岁及以上的患者中。方法:在2021年7月1日至2日期间检索PubMed、Medline、CINAHL、Embase和Cochrane Library,并于2021年12月25日更新,以选择将药剂师主导的疗养院和门诊护理环境下的描述与常规护理进行比较的研究。评估了与卫生服务利用率、临床有效性、成本效益和成本效用相关的结果。结果:通过数据库检索,共识别出3944条相关记录。通过对所选研究的引文和参考文献列表进行跟踪,又确定了10项记录。经过评估,9项研究被纳入审查。纳入的研究中有四项报告了与卫生服务利用和临床有效性有关的结果,三项研究仅报告了卫生服务利用,两项经济研究分别报告了成本效益和成本效用。七分之六的报告医疗服务利用结果的研究发现,在实施药剂师主导的描述后,医疗服务利用率有所提高。然而,没有积极的临床有效性结果,也没有针对经济结果的全球研究。结论:本证具有中到高质量。药剂师主导的描述仅能有效降低养老院和门诊护理环境中老年人PIM的使用和药物负担,但没有临床有效性结果。评估除加拿大(高收入县)以外的不同国家的经济成果至关重要。家庭医学和初级保健:开放获取Alsallal M,et al.J Family Med Prim Care Open Acc 6:170。www.doi.org/10.29011/2688-7460.100070 www.gavinpublishers.com引文:Alsallal M,Alsubaiei N,Assiri E,Amireh A,Booth A,Kofi M(2022)《药剂师主导的老年患者疗养院和门诊护理环境中剥夺性干预的有效性和成本效益:系统综述》。J Family Med Prim Care Open Acc 6:170。DOI:10.29011/2688-7460.100070 2第6卷;第01期
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacist-led Deprescribing Interventions in Nursing Homes and Ambulatory Care Settings in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review
Background: Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) are drugs in which the adverse risks exceed the clinical benefits, lacking evidence-based indications, potentially interact with other medications. PIM use is common in older adults who are frequently treated with multiple medications. PIM use in older adults is associated with many complications. Aim: To critically appraise and systematically evaluate the existing studies on the effectiveness of pharmacist-led deprescribing in health service utilization, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and cost utility. In nursing home and ambulatory care settings and patients aged 65 years and above. Methods: PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched between 1st to 2nd July 2021 and updated on 25th December 2021 to select studies that compare pharmacist-led deprescribing in nursing home and ambulatory care settings with usual care. Outcomes related to health service utilization, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and cost utility were evaluated. Results: A total of 3944 relevant records were identified through database searching. A further ten records were identified by following up citations and reference lists of the selected studies. After assessment, nine studies were included in the review. Four of the included studies reported outcomes relating to both health service utilization and clinical effectiveness, three studies reported only health service utilization, and the two economic studies reported cost effectiveness and cost utility respectively. Six out of seven studies that reported health service utilization outcomes found improvement in health service utilization after the implementation of the pharmacist-led deprescribing. However, there is no positive clinical effectiveness outcomes, and no worldwide studies for the economic outcomes. Conclusion: This evidence of moderate to high quality. Pharmacist-led deprescribing was effective only in reducing PIMs usage and medication burden for older adults in nursing home and ambulatory care setting, but with no clinical effectiveness outcomes. It is essential to evaluate the economic outcomes in different countries other than Canada (high-income county). Family Medicine and Primary Care: Open Access Alsallal M, et al. J Family Med Prim Care Open Acc 6: 170. www.doi.org/10.29011/2688-7460.100070 www.gavinpublishers.com Citation: Alsallal M, Alsubaiei N, Assiri E, Amireh A, Booth A, Kofi M (2022) Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacist-led Deprescribing Interventions in Nursing Homes and Ambulatory Care Settings in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review. J Family Med Prim Care Open Acc 6: 170. DOI: 10.29011/2688-7460.100070 2 Volume 6; Issue 01
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Polishing Resident Advocacy Curriculums in Primary Care Feasibility and Utility of Point-Of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Primary Care Practice. EKOAP Pilot Study Right Cornual Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of Literature Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Therapy for Treatment of Acute Tonsillitis at Primary Care level in Qatar- Clinical Audit Report Validation of a Novel Point-of-Care Testing Device Designed for Assessment of NT-pro BNP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1