岛屿蜥蜴尾巴脱落率的影响因素述评

IF 1.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution Pub Date : 2017-02-07 DOI:10.1163/22244662-06301012
Y. Werner
{"title":"岛屿蜥蜴尾巴脱落率的影响因素述评","authors":"Y. Werner","doi":"10.1163/22244662-06301012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opinions differ whether tail loss in lizards is mainly caused by predators or by intra-specific fighting. Recently this dilemma was investigated through a comparison of lizard tail loss rates between mainland populations in Greece and those on nearby islands harboring fewer predators. The higher tail loss rate on the islands was interpreted as due to the predation-free denser lizard populations having more intra-specific fighting (Itescu et al. 2017, Journal of Animal Ecology 86: 66–74). However, that analysis failed to exclude an alternative hypothesis which I propose and support with well documented circumstantial evidence: The lizards analyzed were Hemidactylus turcicus and Mediodactylus kotschyi (Gekkonidae), both relatively long-lived. On the predator-poor islands they could live longer due to the few predators and thus accumulate the low rate of tail loss. Moreover, both on the mainland and on the islands the tail loss rates are higher in M. kotschyi than in H. turcicus , although life spans are of similar order of magnitude, possibly longer in H. turcicus . But the latter is active at night whereas M. kotschyi is active also in daytime, exposed to more predators during more time. Thus also this inter-specific difference accords with the alternative hypothesis. The two processes are not mutually exclusive and both should be taken into account as potentially responsible for the rate of tail loss in lizards.","PeriodicalId":50267,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution","volume":"63 1","pages":"50-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22244662-06301012","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commentary on the Factors Governing the Rate of Tail Loss in Island Lizards\",\"authors\":\"Y. Werner\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22244662-06301012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Opinions differ whether tail loss in lizards is mainly caused by predators or by intra-specific fighting. Recently this dilemma was investigated through a comparison of lizard tail loss rates between mainland populations in Greece and those on nearby islands harboring fewer predators. The higher tail loss rate on the islands was interpreted as due to the predation-free denser lizard populations having more intra-specific fighting (Itescu et al. 2017, Journal of Animal Ecology 86: 66–74). However, that analysis failed to exclude an alternative hypothesis which I propose and support with well documented circumstantial evidence: The lizards analyzed were Hemidactylus turcicus and Mediodactylus kotschyi (Gekkonidae), both relatively long-lived. On the predator-poor islands they could live longer due to the few predators and thus accumulate the low rate of tail loss. Moreover, both on the mainland and on the islands the tail loss rates are higher in M. kotschyi than in H. turcicus , although life spans are of similar order of magnitude, possibly longer in H. turcicus . But the latter is active at night whereas M. kotschyi is active also in daytime, exposed to more predators during more time. Thus also this inter-specific difference accords with the alternative hypothesis. The two processes are not mutually exclusive and both should be taken into account as potentially responsible for the rate of tail loss in lizards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"50-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22244662-06301012\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22244662-06301012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22244662-06301012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

蜥蜴的尾巴脱落主要是由捕食者还是由种内打斗引起的,对此众说纷纭。最近,通过比较希腊大陆种群和附近食肉动物较少的岛屿种群之间的蜥蜴尾巴损失率,研究人员对这种困境进行了调查。岛上较高的尾巴损失率被解释为由于无捕食者密集的蜥蜴种群有更多的种内打斗(Itescu等人,2017,动物生态学杂志86:66-74)。然而,这一分析未能排除另一种假说,我提出了这种假说,并以详实的间接证据予以支持:分析的蜥蜴是半爪蜥(Hemidactylus turcicus)和中爪蜥(Mediodactylus kotschyi),两者的寿命都相对较长。在没有捕食者的岛屿上,由于捕食者很少,它们可以活得更长,因此尾巴的损失率也较低。此外,在大陆和岛屿上,尽管寿命相似,但黄斑鼩尾巴的损失率都高于黄斑鼩,黄斑鼩的寿命可能更长。但后者在夜间活动,而M. kotschyi在白天也活动,在更长的时间内暴露于更多的捕食者。因此,这种种间差异也符合交替假说。这两个过程并不是相互排斥的,它们都应该被考虑为蜥蜴尾巴丢失率的潜在原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Commentary on the Factors Governing the Rate of Tail Loss in Island Lizards
Opinions differ whether tail loss in lizards is mainly caused by predators or by intra-specific fighting. Recently this dilemma was investigated through a comparison of lizard tail loss rates between mainland populations in Greece and those on nearby islands harboring fewer predators. The higher tail loss rate on the islands was interpreted as due to the predation-free denser lizard populations having more intra-specific fighting (Itescu et al. 2017, Journal of Animal Ecology 86: 66–74). However, that analysis failed to exclude an alternative hypothesis which I propose and support with well documented circumstantial evidence: The lizards analyzed were Hemidactylus turcicus and Mediodactylus kotschyi (Gekkonidae), both relatively long-lived. On the predator-poor islands they could live longer due to the few predators and thus accumulate the low rate of tail loss. Moreover, both on the mainland and on the islands the tail loss rates are higher in M. kotschyi than in H. turcicus , although life spans are of similar order of magnitude, possibly longer in H. turcicus . But the latter is active at night whereas M. kotschyi is active also in daytime, exposed to more predators during more time. Thus also this inter-specific difference accords with the alternative hypothesis. The two processes are not mutually exclusive and both should be taken into account as potentially responsible for the rate of tail loss in lizards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution
Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution 环境科学-进化生物学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution includes high-quality original research and review papers that advance our knowledge and understanding of the function, diversity, abundance, distribution, and evolution of organisms. We give equal consideration to all submissions regardless of geography.
期刊最新文献
Climate change impacts on habitat suitability of Cinnamomum travancoricum (Lauraceae), a critically endangered endemic vascular plant in the Western Ghats, India The neglected role of ciliates as bioindicators Diversity of medium and large-sized mammal species in Chilimo Forest, West Shoa Zone, Ethiopia Behavioral activity and range patterns of the endemic Gelada monkey (Theropithecus gelada) in and around Jer Silase Monastery in North Shoa Zone, Ethiopia Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of Otus species based on mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1