次联邦蓄意排斥与自由贸易:墨西哥的中央集权联邦制和薄弱的制度能力

Q4 Social Sciences Quebec Journal of International Law Pub Date : 2022-07-27 DOI:10.7202/1090917ar
M. López-Vallejo, Jorge A. Schiavon
{"title":"次联邦蓄意排斥与自由贸易:墨西哥的中央集权联邦制和薄弱的制度能力","authors":"M. López-Vallejo, Jorge A. Schiavon","doi":"10.7202/1090917ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the relationship between trade and sub-federal deliberative exclusions in the case of Mexico. Mexican centralized federalism explains the absence of sub-federal governments (SFGs) in the negotiations of free trade agreements, even if they are responsible for dealing with trade outcomes at the local level. This article argues that sub-federal deliberative exclusions are not only evident under the federal allocation of powers but also by their limited institutional capacities (restrictions in budgets and personnel, lack of professionalization, and absence of inter-institutional coordination). This is the case of NAFTA, the USMCA, and the Mexico-European Union Free Agreement in its original and recently renegotiated versions. Despite constraints by federalism and institutional limitations, SFGs engage in trade and investment promotion through inter-institutional agreements (IIAs) allowed by secondary legislation.","PeriodicalId":39264,"journal":{"name":"Quebec Journal of International Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sub-Federal Deliberative Exclusions and Free Trade: Mexico’s Centralized Federalism and Weak Institutional Capacities\",\"authors\":\"M. López-Vallejo, Jorge A. Schiavon\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1090917ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the relationship between trade and sub-federal deliberative exclusions in the case of Mexico. Mexican centralized federalism explains the absence of sub-federal governments (SFGs) in the negotiations of free trade agreements, even if they are responsible for dealing with trade outcomes at the local level. This article argues that sub-federal deliberative exclusions are not only evident under the federal allocation of powers but also by their limited institutional capacities (restrictions in budgets and personnel, lack of professionalization, and absence of inter-institutional coordination). This is the case of NAFTA, the USMCA, and the Mexico-European Union Free Agreement in its original and recently renegotiated versions. Despite constraints by federalism and institutional limitations, SFGs engage in trade and investment promotion through inter-institutional agreements (IIAs) allowed by secondary legislation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quebec Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quebec Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1090917ar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quebec Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1090917ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以墨西哥为例,探讨了贸易与次联邦协商排除之间的关系。墨西哥的中央联邦制解释了为什么在自由贸易协定谈判中没有次联邦政府(SFGs),即使它们负责处理地方层面的贸易结果。本文认为,次联邦审议排除不仅在联邦权力分配下明显存在,而且在其机构能力有限(预算和人员限制、缺乏专业化和缺乏机构间协调)的情况下也很明显。北美自由贸易协定(NAFTA)、美墨加贸易协定(USMCA)和墨西哥-欧盟自由协定(Mexico-European Union Free Agreement)的原始版本以及最近重新谈判的版本都是如此。尽管受到联邦制和体制限制的制约,SFGs通过二级立法允许的机构间协议(IIAs)促进贸易和投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sub-Federal Deliberative Exclusions and Free Trade: Mexico’s Centralized Federalism and Weak Institutional Capacities
This article explores the relationship between trade and sub-federal deliberative exclusions in the case of Mexico. Mexican centralized federalism explains the absence of sub-federal governments (SFGs) in the negotiations of free trade agreements, even if they are responsible for dealing with trade outcomes at the local level. This article argues that sub-federal deliberative exclusions are not only evident under the federal allocation of powers but also by their limited institutional capacities (restrictions in budgets and personnel, lack of professionalization, and absence of inter-institutional coordination). This is the case of NAFTA, the USMCA, and the Mexico-European Union Free Agreement in its original and recently renegotiated versions. Despite constraints by federalism and institutional limitations, SFGs engage in trade and investment promotion through inter-institutional agreements (IIAs) allowed by secondary legislation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Memoria, Verdad y Justicia: Situación y perspectivas The Inter-American System's Recent Contributions to the Development of Women's Human Rights Standards Pueblo mapuche vs Estado de Chile ante la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos: experiencia del lof Temulemu Indigenous peoples’ rights and the multicultural approach: For a twin-track dialogue between Canada and the Inter-American Human Rights System Indigenous women leading the defense of human rights from abuses related to mega-projects: Impacting corporate behavior — overcoming silencing practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1