高能力学生的需求满足与动机:不同设置的定量与定性比较

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education Pub Date : 2022-06-27 DOI:10.1080/02783193.2022.2071367
L. Hornstra, Marjolijn van Weerdenburg, Maartje van den Brand, L. Hoogeveen, A. Bakx
{"title":"高能力学生的需求满足与动机:不同设置的定量与定性比较","authors":"L. Hornstra, Marjolijn van Weerdenburg, Maartje van den Brand, L. Hoogeveen, A. Bakx","doi":"10.1080/02783193.2022.2071367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this two-part study, high-ability students’ experiences of need support, need satisfaction, and motivation in regular and pull-out classes were compared. Quantitative results from Study 1 indicated that high-ability students (N = 203) reported more satisfaction of their needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness and more favorable motivational outcomes in their pull-out class compared to their regular class. In both settings, need satisfaction predicted high-ability students’ motivational outcomes. These findings could be explained by the qualitative findings from Study 2 which indicated that high-ability students (N = 11) experienced pull-out class teachers as more supportive of their needs than their regular class teachers. Overall, findings suggest that need-supportive teaching is an effective strategy to foster high-ability students’ motivation in both regular classes as well as pull-out classes.","PeriodicalId":46979,"journal":{"name":"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-Ability Students’ Need Satisfaction and Motivation in Pull-Out and Regular Classes: A Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison Between Settings\",\"authors\":\"L. Hornstra, Marjolijn van Weerdenburg, Maartje van den Brand, L. Hoogeveen, A. Bakx\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02783193.2022.2071367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this two-part study, high-ability students’ experiences of need support, need satisfaction, and motivation in regular and pull-out classes were compared. Quantitative results from Study 1 indicated that high-ability students (N = 203) reported more satisfaction of their needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness and more favorable motivational outcomes in their pull-out class compared to their regular class. In both settings, need satisfaction predicted high-ability students’ motivational outcomes. These findings could be explained by the qualitative findings from Study 2 which indicated that high-ability students (N = 11) experienced pull-out class teachers as more supportive of their needs than their regular class teachers. Overall, findings suggest that need-supportive teaching is an effective strategy to foster high-ability students’ motivation in both regular classes as well as pull-out classes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2022.2071367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2022.2071367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本研究分为两部分,比较了高能力学生在常规班和退出班的需要支持、需要满足和动机体验。研究1的定量结果显示,高能力学生(N = 203)在退出课堂上对自主性、能力和相关性需求的满意度更高,并且与常规课堂相比,他们的动机结果更有利。在这两种情况下,需求满意度预测高能力学生的动机结果。这些发现可以用研究2的定性研究结果来解释,研究2表明,高能力学生(N = 11)经历过抽离班主任比普通班主任更支持他们的需求。总体而言,研究结果表明,需求支持教学是一种有效的策略,可以在常规课程和课外课程中培养高能力学生的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High-Ability Students’ Need Satisfaction and Motivation in Pull-Out and Regular Classes: A Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison Between Settings
ABSTRACT In this two-part study, high-ability students’ experiences of need support, need satisfaction, and motivation in regular and pull-out classes were compared. Quantitative results from Study 1 indicated that high-ability students (N = 203) reported more satisfaction of their needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness and more favorable motivational outcomes in their pull-out class compared to their regular class. In both settings, need satisfaction predicted high-ability students’ motivational outcomes. These findings could be explained by the qualitative findings from Study 2 which indicated that high-ability students (N = 11) experienced pull-out class teachers as more supportive of their needs than their regular class teachers. Overall, findings suggest that need-supportive teaching is an effective strategy to foster high-ability students’ motivation in both regular classes as well as pull-out classes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
The Life and Work of Marcia Gentry: Providing Opportunities and Promoting Excellence Marcia Gentry: Early Research Passions and Subsequent Important Contributions to Equity and Diverse Students Marcia Gentry as Influencer: Leader, Scholar, Colleague, Friend Memories and Musings: My Experiences with Marcia Gentry and More Inspiring the Future: An Interview with Kenneth Kiewra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1