通过对反思性期刊六阶段框架的分析探讨职前教师的反思性实践

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Reflective Practice Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.1080/14623943.2022.2071246
Bee Choo Yee, Tina Abdullah, Abdullah Mohd Nawi
{"title":"通过对反思性期刊六阶段框架的分析探讨职前教师的反思性实践","authors":"Bee Choo Yee, Tina Abdullah, Abdullah Mohd Nawi","doi":"10.1080/14623943.2022.2071246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Reflective journal is used by the pre-service teachers (PSTs) to reflect on their learning and teaching experiences in the classroom but they lack writing it in a more critical way. This study aims to explore the common stages of reflective practice among the PSTs using a six-stage framework. The methodology utilised a case study involving a purposive sampling of a group of 20 participants in an institute of teacher education in Malaysia. The instruments were observations, reflective journals and interviews. The journals were analysed using content analysis by following the framework of reflective practice. The results showed that the PSTs reflected mostly at ‘Describing’ (36.04%), followed by ‘Analysing’ (26.00%), ‘Associating’ (21.15%), ‘Feeling’ (12.12%), ‘Assessing’ (2.78%), and ‘Developing’ (1.92%). The findings indicated that the PSTs reflected mostly at the lowest stage of ‘Describing’ compared to the highest stage of ‘Developing’. It is also interesting to note that the PSTs reflected more deeply after they were able to project their feelings and receive peer feedback. The six-stage framework used in this study not only provides the PSTs a guideline to reflect deeply, but also allows them to develop their future roles as teachers. The implication is for the policy makers and educators to include the proposed framework in the course syllabus and it is recommended for the PSTs to use it as a guideline in developing their reflective practice.","PeriodicalId":51594,"journal":{"name":"Reflective Practice","volume":"23 1","pages":"552 - 564"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring pre-service teachers’ reflective practice through an analysis of six-stage framework in reflective journals\",\"authors\":\"Bee Choo Yee, Tina Abdullah, Abdullah Mohd Nawi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14623943.2022.2071246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Reflective journal is used by the pre-service teachers (PSTs) to reflect on their learning and teaching experiences in the classroom but they lack writing it in a more critical way. This study aims to explore the common stages of reflective practice among the PSTs using a six-stage framework. The methodology utilised a case study involving a purposive sampling of a group of 20 participants in an institute of teacher education in Malaysia. The instruments were observations, reflective journals and interviews. The journals were analysed using content analysis by following the framework of reflective practice. The results showed that the PSTs reflected mostly at ‘Describing’ (36.04%), followed by ‘Analysing’ (26.00%), ‘Associating’ (21.15%), ‘Feeling’ (12.12%), ‘Assessing’ (2.78%), and ‘Developing’ (1.92%). The findings indicated that the PSTs reflected mostly at the lowest stage of ‘Describing’ compared to the highest stage of ‘Developing’. It is also interesting to note that the PSTs reflected more deeply after they were able to project their feelings and receive peer feedback. The six-stage framework used in this study not only provides the PSTs a guideline to reflect deeply, but also allows them to develop their future roles as teachers. The implication is for the policy makers and educators to include the proposed framework in the course syllabus and it is recommended for the PSTs to use it as a guideline in developing their reflective practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reflective Practice\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"552 - 564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reflective Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2071246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflective Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2071246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要反思日记是职前教师用来反思自己在课堂上的学习和教学经历的日记,但他们缺乏更批判性的写作方式。本研究旨在使用六个阶段的框架来探索心理战中反思实践的常见阶段。该方法采用了一项案例研究,该研究涉及对马来西亚一所师范学院的20名参与者进行有针对性的抽样。这些工具是观察、反思性期刊和访谈。根据反思实践的框架,采用内容分析法对期刊进行分析。结果表明,心理状态测试主要反映在“描述”(36.04%),其次是“分析”(26.00%)、“联想”(21.15%)、“感觉”(12.12%)、“评估”(2.78%)和“发展”(1.92%)。同样有趣的是,PST在能够表达自己的感受并获得同伴反馈后,反映得更深刻。本研究中使用的六阶段框架不仅为PST提供了一个深入反思的指导方针,而且使他们能够发展自己未来的教师角色。这意味着政策制定者和教育工作者将拟议的框架纳入课程大纲,并建议PST将其作为发展反思实践的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring pre-service teachers’ reflective practice through an analysis of six-stage framework in reflective journals
ABSTRACT Reflective journal is used by the pre-service teachers (PSTs) to reflect on their learning and teaching experiences in the classroom but they lack writing it in a more critical way. This study aims to explore the common stages of reflective practice among the PSTs using a six-stage framework. The methodology utilised a case study involving a purposive sampling of a group of 20 participants in an institute of teacher education in Malaysia. The instruments were observations, reflective journals and interviews. The journals were analysed using content analysis by following the framework of reflective practice. The results showed that the PSTs reflected mostly at ‘Describing’ (36.04%), followed by ‘Analysing’ (26.00%), ‘Associating’ (21.15%), ‘Feeling’ (12.12%), ‘Assessing’ (2.78%), and ‘Developing’ (1.92%). The findings indicated that the PSTs reflected mostly at the lowest stage of ‘Describing’ compared to the highest stage of ‘Developing’. It is also interesting to note that the PSTs reflected more deeply after they were able to project their feelings and receive peer feedback. The six-stage framework used in this study not only provides the PSTs a guideline to reflect deeply, but also allows them to develop their future roles as teachers. The implication is for the policy makers and educators to include the proposed framework in the course syllabus and it is recommended for the PSTs to use it as a guideline in developing their reflective practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reflective Practice
Reflective Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Doing cross-cultural interviews from Vietnamese students’ experience and reflective practice: lessons on intercultural communicative competence Reflection tools – support for patient learning in group education What does inclusion look like within an experiential teaching and assessing reflective learning model? Utilising authentic assessment to foster shared social membership Investigating the development of peer-led asynchronous digitally mediated feedback in higher education: three case studies On the journey from cognizance toward thriving: Iranian EFL teachers’ engagement in reflective practice and professional development: the mediating effect of teacher mindfulness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1