Adwoa Parker, Catherine Arundel, Nicola Mills, Leila Rooshenas, Marcus Jepson, Jenny L Donovan, Jane M Blazeby, Elizabeth Coleman, Laura Clark, Laura Doherty, Catherine E Hewitt, Prasanna Partha Sarathy, David Beard, Peter Bower, Stephen Brealey, Paul Brocklehurst, Cindy Cooper, Julie Croft, Lucy Culliford, Joseph Dias, Declan Devane, Sandra Eldridge, Richard Emsley, Sandra Galvin, Elke Gemperle-Mannion, David G Jayne, Andrew J Metcalfe, Alan Montgomery, Amar Rangan, Christopher J Sutton, Puvanendran Tharmanathan, Shaun Treweek, David Torgerson
{"title":"提高外科随机对照试验参与者招募的工作人员培训:同时跨四个宿主试验的试验内可行性研究(SWAT)","authors":"Adwoa Parker, Catherine Arundel, Nicola Mills, Leila Rooshenas, Marcus Jepson, Jenny L Donovan, Jane M Blazeby, Elizabeth Coleman, Laura Clark, Laura Doherty, Catherine E Hewitt, Prasanna Partha Sarathy, David Beard, Peter Bower, Stephen Brealey, Paul Brocklehurst, Cindy Cooper, Julie Croft, Lucy Culliford, Joseph Dias, Declan Devane, Sandra Eldridge, Richard Emsley, Sandra Galvin, Elke Gemperle-Mannion, David G Jayne, Andrew J Metcalfe, Alan Montgomery, Amar Rangan, Christopher J Sutton, Puvanendran Tharmanathan, Shaun Treweek, David Torgerson","doi":"10.1177/26320843221106950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the feasibility of undertaking a simultaneous Study Within A Trial (SWAT) to train staff who recruit participants into surgical randomised controlled trials (RCTs), by assessing key uncertainties around recruitment, randomisation, intervention delivery and data collection.</p><p><strong>Study design and setting: </strong>Twelve surgical RCTs were eligible. Interested sites (clusters) were randomised 1:1, with recruiting staff (surgeons and nurses) offered training or no training. The primary outcome was the feasibility of recruiting sites across multiple surgical trials simultaneously. Secondary outcomes included numbers/types of staff enrolled, attendance at training, training acceptability, confidence in recruiting and participant recruitment rates six months later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four RCTs (33%) comprising 91 sites participated. Of these, 29 sites agreed to participate (32%) and were randomised to intervention (15 sites, 29 staff) or control (14 sites, 29 staff). Research nurses attended and found the training to be acceptable; no surgeons attended. In the intervention group, there was evidence of increased confidence when pre- and post- training scores were compared (mean difference in change 1.42; 95% CI 0.56, 2.27; <i>p</i> = 0.002). There was no effect on recruitment rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was feasible to randomise sites across four surgical RCTs in a simultaneous SWAT design. However, as small numbers of trials and sites participated, and no surgeons attended training, strategies to improve these aspects are needed for future evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74683,"journal":{"name":"Research methods in medicine & health sciences","volume":"4 1","pages":"2-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13021011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Staff training to improve participant recruitment into surgical randomised controlled trials: A feasibility study within a trial (SWAT) across four host trials simultaneously.\",\"authors\":\"Adwoa Parker, Catherine Arundel, Nicola Mills, Leila Rooshenas, Marcus Jepson, Jenny L Donovan, Jane M Blazeby, Elizabeth Coleman, Laura Clark, Laura Doherty, Catherine E Hewitt, Prasanna Partha Sarathy, David Beard, Peter Bower, Stephen Brealey, Paul Brocklehurst, Cindy Cooper, Julie Croft, Lucy Culliford, Joseph Dias, Declan Devane, Sandra Eldridge, Richard Emsley, Sandra Galvin, Elke Gemperle-Mannion, David G Jayne, Andrew J Metcalfe, Alan Montgomery, Amar Rangan, Christopher J Sutton, Puvanendran Tharmanathan, Shaun Treweek, David Torgerson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26320843221106950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the feasibility of undertaking a simultaneous Study Within A Trial (SWAT) to train staff who recruit participants into surgical randomised controlled trials (RCTs), by assessing key uncertainties around recruitment, randomisation, intervention delivery and data collection.</p><p><strong>Study design and setting: </strong>Twelve surgical RCTs were eligible. Interested sites (clusters) were randomised 1:1, with recruiting staff (surgeons and nurses) offered training or no training. The primary outcome was the feasibility of recruiting sites across multiple surgical trials simultaneously. Secondary outcomes included numbers/types of staff enrolled, attendance at training, training acceptability, confidence in recruiting and participant recruitment rates six months later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four RCTs (33%) comprising 91 sites participated. Of these, 29 sites agreed to participate (32%) and were randomised to intervention (15 sites, 29 staff) or control (14 sites, 29 staff). Research nurses attended and found the training to be acceptable; no surgeons attended. In the intervention group, there was evidence of increased confidence when pre- and post- training scores were compared (mean difference in change 1.42; 95% CI 0.56, 2.27; <i>p</i> = 0.002). There was no effect on recruitment rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was feasible to randomise sites across four surgical RCTs in a simultaneous SWAT design. However, as small numbers of trials and sites participated, and no surgeons attended training, strategies to improve these aspects are needed for future evaluations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research methods in medicine & health sciences\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"2-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13021011/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research methods in medicine & health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26320843221106950\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research methods in medicine & health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26320843221106950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Staff training to improve participant recruitment into surgical randomised controlled trials: A feasibility study within a trial (SWAT) across four host trials simultaneously.
Objective: To test the feasibility of undertaking a simultaneous Study Within A Trial (SWAT) to train staff who recruit participants into surgical randomised controlled trials (RCTs), by assessing key uncertainties around recruitment, randomisation, intervention delivery and data collection.
Study design and setting: Twelve surgical RCTs were eligible. Interested sites (clusters) were randomised 1:1, with recruiting staff (surgeons and nurses) offered training or no training. The primary outcome was the feasibility of recruiting sites across multiple surgical trials simultaneously. Secondary outcomes included numbers/types of staff enrolled, attendance at training, training acceptability, confidence in recruiting and participant recruitment rates six months later.
Results: Four RCTs (33%) comprising 91 sites participated. Of these, 29 sites agreed to participate (32%) and were randomised to intervention (15 sites, 29 staff) or control (14 sites, 29 staff). Research nurses attended and found the training to be acceptable; no surgeons attended. In the intervention group, there was evidence of increased confidence when pre- and post- training scores were compared (mean difference in change 1.42; 95% CI 0.56, 2.27; p = 0.002). There was no effect on recruitment rate.
Conclusion: It was feasible to randomise sites across four surgical RCTs in a simultaneous SWAT design. However, as small numbers of trials and sites participated, and no surgeons attended training, strategies to improve these aspects are needed for future evaluations.