简单易懂的语言是语言裁剪和标准语言变种的特殊情况

IF 0.5 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Nordic Journal of Linguistics Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1017/S0332586522000142
Leealaura Leskelä, Arto Mustajoki, Aino Piehl
{"title":"简单易懂的语言是语言裁剪和标准语言变种的特殊情况","authors":"Leealaura Leskelä, Arto Mustajoki, Aino Piehl","doi":"10.1017/S0332586522000142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article aims to introduce new insights to further the understanding of easy language (EL) and plain language (PL) as examples of tailored language and place them within a broader context of linguistic varieties. We examine EL and PL in relation to standard language, and we consider the degree of conscious effort required in tailoring and the compliance with the codified norms of standard language. Both EL and PL are used in asymmetric communication: PL to mediate between specialists and the general public and EL in communication with people with language barriers. We argue that while these varieties have similar purposes and methods, they also have significant differences; for example, the tailoring moves in opposite directions, as PL seeks general comprehensibility and EL aims to reach special and vulnerable groups. The differences between PL and EL are primarily linked to social prestige and the potential risk of stigma related to their use.","PeriodicalId":43203,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Linguistics","volume":"45 1","pages":"194 - 213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Easy and plain languages as special cases of linguistic tailoring and standard language varieties\",\"authors\":\"Leealaura Leskelä, Arto Mustajoki, Aino Piehl\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0332586522000142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article aims to introduce new insights to further the understanding of easy language (EL) and plain language (PL) as examples of tailored language and place them within a broader context of linguistic varieties. We examine EL and PL in relation to standard language, and we consider the degree of conscious effort required in tailoring and the compliance with the codified norms of standard language. Both EL and PL are used in asymmetric communication: PL to mediate between specialists and the general public and EL in communication with people with language barriers. We argue that while these varieties have similar purposes and methods, they also have significant differences; for example, the tailoring moves in opposite directions, as PL seeks general comprehensibility and EL aims to reach special and vulnerable groups. The differences between PL and EL are primarily linked to social prestige and the potential risk of stigma related to their use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Journal of Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"194 - 213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Journal of Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586522000142\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586522000142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文旨在引入新的见解,以进一步理解简单语言(EL)和简明语言(PL)作为定制语言的例子,并将它们放在更广泛的语言变体背景下。我们研究了EL和PL与标准语言的关系,并考虑了在剪裁和遵守标准语言规范方面所需的自觉努力的程度。EL和PL都用于非对称交流:PL用于在专家和公众之间进行调解,EL用于与有语言障碍的人进行交流。我们认为,虽然这些品种有相似的目的和方法,但它们也有显著的差异;例如,剪裁朝着相反的方向发展,因为PL寻求普遍的可理解性,而EL旨在接触特殊和弱势群体。PL和EL之间的差异主要与社会声望以及与使用它们相关的潜在污名风险有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Easy and plain languages as special cases of linguistic tailoring and standard language varieties
Abstract This article aims to introduce new insights to further the understanding of easy language (EL) and plain language (PL) as examples of tailored language and place them within a broader context of linguistic varieties. We examine EL and PL in relation to standard language, and we consider the degree of conscious effort required in tailoring and the compliance with the codified norms of standard language. Both EL and PL are used in asymmetric communication: PL to mediate between specialists and the general public and EL in communication with people with language barriers. We argue that while these varieties have similar purposes and methods, they also have significant differences; for example, the tailoring moves in opposite directions, as PL seeks general comprehensibility and EL aims to reach special and vulnerable groups. The differences between PL and EL are primarily linked to social prestige and the potential risk of stigma related to their use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Strong Finals: A prosodic feature projecting ‘more to come’ in a Danish urban dialect Argument structure constructions in competition: The Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat alternation in Icelandic The Gutnish si-passive Enhanced coarticulatory labialization of /ts/ in Argentine Danish Building languages: Estonian–English two-year-old bilingual’s reliance on patterns in code-mixed utterances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1