文学“更高维度”的量化:对九个故事的文体学研究

Q1 Arts and Humanities Glottotheory Pub Date : 2021-09-27 DOI:10.1515/glot-2021-2021
Michal Místecký, Tomi S. Melka
{"title":"文学“更高维度”的量化:对九个故事的文体学研究","authors":"Michal Místecký, Tomi S. Melka","doi":"10.1515/glot-2021-2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The study will focus on the quantitative assessment of nine stories, considered important contributions in the supernatural and in the early and modern science-fiction prose. Besides the two treatments of the topic of imaginary Flatland – penned by E. A. Abbott and C. H. Hinton –, the corpus includes writings by H. G. Wells, A. Blackwood, M. Leinster, G. Waldeyer, R. A. Heinlein, L. Padgett, and A. C. Clarke. Texts are researched on the bases of four analyses (moving-average type-token ratio, average tokens length, Busemann’s coefficient, and collocation associativity), with the results tested for statistical significance; next, the textual comparisons will provide a springboard for sketches of literary criticism interpretations. The analyzed corpus has revealed the distinctive and colorful take writers have in their stories. By the nature of their subject, the texts are expected to share higher dimensions and time warps, a thread implying a meeting point in terms of vocabulary richness, plot development, and possibly of narrative structure. Yet, in most cases, the findings suggest basic and nuanced differences, hinting at clear stylistic physiognomies in the authorship. The outcome affects not only the assessment of the weight individual samples have, but also the interface between a common (sub)genre and personal style.","PeriodicalId":37792,"journal":{"name":"Glottotheory","volume":"12 1","pages":"129 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literary “higher dimensions” quantified: a stylometric study of nine stories\",\"authors\":\"Michal Místecký, Tomi S. Melka\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/glot-2021-2021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The study will focus on the quantitative assessment of nine stories, considered important contributions in the supernatural and in the early and modern science-fiction prose. Besides the two treatments of the topic of imaginary Flatland – penned by E. A. Abbott and C. H. Hinton –, the corpus includes writings by H. G. Wells, A. Blackwood, M. Leinster, G. Waldeyer, R. A. Heinlein, L. Padgett, and A. C. Clarke. Texts are researched on the bases of four analyses (moving-average type-token ratio, average tokens length, Busemann’s coefficient, and collocation associativity), with the results tested for statistical significance; next, the textual comparisons will provide a springboard for sketches of literary criticism interpretations. The analyzed corpus has revealed the distinctive and colorful take writers have in their stories. By the nature of their subject, the texts are expected to share higher dimensions and time warps, a thread implying a meeting point in terms of vocabulary richness, plot development, and possibly of narrative structure. Yet, in most cases, the findings suggest basic and nuanced differences, hinting at clear stylistic physiognomies in the authorship. The outcome affects not only the assessment of the weight individual samples have, but also the interface between a common (sub)genre and personal style.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Glottotheory\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"129 - 157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Glottotheory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/glot-2021-2021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glottotheory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/glot-2021-2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究将重点对九个故事进行定量评估,这些故事被认为对超自然现象以及早期和现代科幻散文有重要贡献。除了E.A.Abbott和C.H.Hinton对想象中的平地主题的两种处理之外,语料库还包括H.G.Wells、A.Blackwood、M.Leinster、G.Waldeyer、R.A.Heinlein、L.Padgett和A.C.Clarke的著作。基于四个分析(移动平均型标记比率、平均标记长度、布斯曼系数和搭配关联性)对文本进行了研究,并对结果进行了统计显著性检验;其次,文本比较将为文学批评阐释提供一个跳板。通过对语料库的分析,揭示了作家对故事的独特而丰富多彩的理解。根据主题的性质,文本被期望共享更高的维度和时间扭曲,这条线索暗示了词汇丰富性、情节发展以及叙事结构方面的交汇点。然而,在大多数情况下,研究结果表明了基本的细微差别,暗示了作者明显的风格特征。结果不仅影响个体样本的权重评估,还影响共同(子)类型和个人风格之间的界面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Literary “higher dimensions” quantified: a stylometric study of nine stories
Abstract The study will focus on the quantitative assessment of nine stories, considered important contributions in the supernatural and in the early and modern science-fiction prose. Besides the two treatments of the topic of imaginary Flatland – penned by E. A. Abbott and C. H. Hinton –, the corpus includes writings by H. G. Wells, A. Blackwood, M. Leinster, G. Waldeyer, R. A. Heinlein, L. Padgett, and A. C. Clarke. Texts are researched on the bases of four analyses (moving-average type-token ratio, average tokens length, Busemann’s coefficient, and collocation associativity), with the results tested for statistical significance; next, the textual comparisons will provide a springboard for sketches of literary criticism interpretations. The analyzed corpus has revealed the distinctive and colorful take writers have in their stories. By the nature of their subject, the texts are expected to share higher dimensions and time warps, a thread implying a meeting point in terms of vocabulary richness, plot development, and possibly of narrative structure. Yet, in most cases, the findings suggest basic and nuanced differences, hinting at clear stylistic physiognomies in the authorship. The outcome affects not only the assessment of the weight individual samples have, but also the interface between a common (sub)genre and personal style.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Glottotheory
Glottotheory Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The foci of Glottotheory are: observations and descriptions of all aspects of language and text phenomena including the areas of psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, dialectology, pragmatics, etc. on all levels of linguistic analysis, applications of methods, models or findings from quantitative linguistics concerning problems of natural language processing, language teaching, documentation and information retrieval, methodological problems of linguistic measurement, model construction, sampling and test theory, epistemological issues such as explanation of language and text phenomena, contributions to theory construction, systems theory, philosophy of science. The journal considers itself as platform for a dialogue between quantitative and qualitative linguistics.
期刊最新文献
Repräsentation der positiven Basisemotionen in der deutschen digitalen kommunikation Verfasserverweise und Typen wissenschaftssprachlichen Handelns: Eine vergleichende Korpusstudie anhand deutscher und polnischer Abschlussarbeiten Beyond warzones: conflict-stricken states as viewed by the Czech corpus collocations „Sprachkontakte“ aus der Sicht der kontrastiven Linguokulturologie Von der Entlehnung über das Codemeshing bis zum Translanguaging: Prozesse, Ergebnisse und Folgen von Sprachkontakt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1