I. Alviya, F. Salaka, M. Z. Muttaqin, F. Nurfatriani, E. Y. Suryandari
{"title":"发展社区林业融资政策的有效性","authors":"I. Alviya, F. Salaka, M. Z. Muttaqin, F. Nurfatriani, E. Y. Suryandari","doi":"10.20886/jakk.2020.17.1.53-73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community Plantation Forest, known as Hutan Tanaman Rakyat or HTR, is one of social forestry programs aiming at reducing economic inequality at rural community level. However, there is no evidence that HTR has improved the community welfare at the local level due to some problems particularly funding availability. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of financing policy in developing HTR carried out by the Public Service Agency of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (BLU-KLHK) and to look for alternative sources of funding that might support the ongoing funding mechanism. Survey and focus group discussion (FGD) are methods used to collect the data. Qualitative descriptive, content analysis and Grindle theory approaches are implemented to analyze data. The results show that, based on the content of the policy, HTR financing mechanism managed by BLU-KLHK is efficient, comprehensive and prudent in regulating and facilitating the financial support to develop HTR. However, this funding policy has not been effective to support HTR business development at the implementation stages. Some other funding schemes that might be potential to support the development of HTR include LPDB, SBSN, Rural Area Development Program, and Village Fund.","PeriodicalId":31802,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FINANCING POLICY FOR THE DEVELOPING COMMUNITY FOREST PLANTATION\",\"authors\":\"I. Alviya, F. Salaka, M. Z. Muttaqin, F. Nurfatriani, E. Y. Suryandari\",\"doi\":\"10.20886/jakk.2020.17.1.53-73\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Community Plantation Forest, known as Hutan Tanaman Rakyat or HTR, is one of social forestry programs aiming at reducing economic inequality at rural community level. However, there is no evidence that HTR has improved the community welfare at the local level due to some problems particularly funding availability. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of financing policy in developing HTR carried out by the Public Service Agency of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (BLU-KLHK) and to look for alternative sources of funding that might support the ongoing funding mechanism. Survey and focus group discussion (FGD) are methods used to collect the data. Qualitative descriptive, content analysis and Grindle theory approaches are implemented to analyze data. The results show that, based on the content of the policy, HTR financing mechanism managed by BLU-KLHK is efficient, comprehensive and prudent in regulating and facilitating the financial support to develop HTR. However, this funding policy has not been effective to support HTR business development at the implementation stages. Some other funding schemes that might be potential to support the development of HTR include LPDB, SBSN, Rural Area Development Program, and Village Fund.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2020.17.1.53-73\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2020.17.1.53-73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
社区种植林,被称为Hutan Tanaman Rakyat或HTR,是旨在减少农村社区经济不平等的社会林业项目之一。然而,没有证据表明HTR由于一些问题,特别是资金可用性,改善了地方一级的社区福利。本研究旨在评估环境和林业部公共服务机构(BLU-KLHK)在开发HTR方面的融资政策的有效性,并寻找可能支持现行融资机制的替代资金来源。调查和焦点小组讨论(FGD)是用于收集数据的方法。采用定性描述、内容分析和Grindle理论方法对数据进行分析。研究结果表明,从政策内容来看,BLU-KLHK管理的HTR融资机制在规范和促进金融支持发展HTR方面是高效、全面和谨慎的。然而,这项资助政策在实施阶段并不能有效地支持HTR业务的发展。其他一些可能支持HTR发展的资助计划包括LPDB、SBSN、农村地区发展计划和乡村基金。
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FINANCING POLICY FOR THE DEVELOPING COMMUNITY FOREST PLANTATION
Community Plantation Forest, known as Hutan Tanaman Rakyat or HTR, is one of social forestry programs aiming at reducing economic inequality at rural community level. However, there is no evidence that HTR has improved the community welfare at the local level due to some problems particularly funding availability. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of financing policy in developing HTR carried out by the Public Service Agency of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (BLU-KLHK) and to look for alternative sources of funding that might support the ongoing funding mechanism. Survey and focus group discussion (FGD) are methods used to collect the data. Qualitative descriptive, content analysis and Grindle theory approaches are implemented to analyze data. The results show that, based on the content of the policy, HTR financing mechanism managed by BLU-KLHK is efficient, comprehensive and prudent in regulating and facilitating the financial support to develop HTR. However, this funding policy has not been effective to support HTR business development at the implementation stages. Some other funding schemes that might be potential to support the development of HTR include LPDB, SBSN, Rural Area Development Program, and Village Fund.