{"title":"胃切除术联合化疗与单纯化疗治疗晚期癌症腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的疗效比较","authors":"Xue Wang, Jiqing Wang, Song Liu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-9801.2019.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the therapeutic effect and prognosis of gastrectomy combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone for treatment of advanced gastric cancer with abdominal para-aortic (the 16th) lymph node metastasis. \n \n \nMethods \nThe clinical data of 236 patients with advanced gastric cancer with abdominal para-aortic (the 16th) lymph node metastasis in Jincheng People's Hospital of Shanxi Province from January 2003 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment method, the patients were divided into chemotherapy alone group (121 cases) and gastrectomy + chemotherapy group (115 cases), and mFOLFOX6 regimen was used for chemotherapy. The efficacy and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared. \n \n \nResults \nThe incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events in the gastrectomy+chemotherapy group was higher than that in the chemotherapy alone group [8.7% (10/115) vs. 1.7% (2/121)], and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ 2 = 3.881, P = 0.049). The median overall survival was 14.8 months (10.9-17.8 months) in the chemotherapy alone group and 11.7 months (9.8-15.6 months) in the gastrectomy+chemotherapy group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The 2-year overall survival rate was 32.3% in the chemotherapy alone group and 24.3% in the gastrectomy+chemotherapy group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (χ 2 = 3.105, P = 0.078). The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 16.5% in the chemotherapy alone group and 20.0% in the gastrectomy+chemotherapy group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ 2 = 3.917, P = 0.047). \n \n \nConclusion \nCompared with chemotherapy alone, advanced gastric cancer patients with abdominal para-aortic (the 16th) lymph node metastasis could not benefit from gastrectomy combined with chemotherapy. \n \n \nKey words: \nStomach neoplasms; Drug therapy, combination; Gastrectomy","PeriodicalId":9505,"journal":{"name":"肿瘤研究与临床","volume":"31 1","pages":"760-763"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy comparison between gastrectomy combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone for treatment of advanced gastric cancer with abdominal para-aortic lymph node metastasis\",\"authors\":\"Xue Wang, Jiqing Wang, Song Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-9801.2019.11.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the therapeutic effect and prognosis of gastrectomy combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone for treatment of advanced gastric cancer with abdominal para-aortic (the 16th) lymph node metastasis. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThe clinical data of 236 patients with advanced gastric cancer with abdominal para-aortic (the 16th) lymph node metastasis in Jincheng People's Hospital of Shanxi Province from January 2003 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment method, the patients were divided into chemotherapy alone group (121 cases) and gastrectomy + chemotherapy group (115 cases), and mFOLFOX6 regimen was used for chemotherapy. The efficacy and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events in the gastrectomy+chemotherapy group was higher than that in the chemotherapy alone group [8.7% (10/115) vs. 1.7% (2/121)], and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ 2 = 3.881, P = 0.049). The median overall survival was 14.8 months (10.9-17.8 months) in the chemotherapy alone group and 11.7 months (9.8-15.6 months) in the gastrectomy+chemotherapy group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The 2-year overall survival rate was 32.3% in the chemotherapy alone group and 24.3% in the gastrectomy+chemotherapy group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (χ 2 = 3.105, P = 0.078). The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 16.5% in the chemotherapy alone group and 20.0% in the gastrectomy+chemotherapy group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ 2 = 3.917, P = 0.047). \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nCompared with chemotherapy alone, advanced gastric cancer patients with abdominal para-aortic (the 16th) lymph node metastasis could not benefit from gastrectomy combined with chemotherapy. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nStomach neoplasms; Drug therapy, combination; Gastrectomy\",\"PeriodicalId\":9505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"肿瘤研究与临床\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"760-763\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"肿瘤研究与临床\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-9801.2019.11.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"肿瘤研究与临床","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-9801.2019.11.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy comparison between gastrectomy combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone for treatment of advanced gastric cancer with abdominal para-aortic lymph node metastasis
Objective
To investigate the therapeutic effect and prognosis of gastrectomy combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone for treatment of advanced gastric cancer with abdominal para-aortic (the 16th) lymph node metastasis.
Methods
The clinical data of 236 patients with advanced gastric cancer with abdominal para-aortic (the 16th) lymph node metastasis in Jincheng People's Hospital of Shanxi Province from January 2003 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment method, the patients were divided into chemotherapy alone group (121 cases) and gastrectomy + chemotherapy group (115 cases), and mFOLFOX6 regimen was used for chemotherapy. The efficacy and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared.
Results
The incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events in the gastrectomy+chemotherapy group was higher than that in the chemotherapy alone group [8.7% (10/115) vs. 1.7% (2/121)], and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ 2 = 3.881, P = 0.049). The median overall survival was 14.8 months (10.9-17.8 months) in the chemotherapy alone group and 11.7 months (9.8-15.6 months) in the gastrectomy+chemotherapy group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The 2-year overall survival rate was 32.3% in the chemotherapy alone group and 24.3% in the gastrectomy+chemotherapy group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (χ 2 = 3.105, P = 0.078). The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 16.5% in the chemotherapy alone group and 20.0% in the gastrectomy+chemotherapy group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ 2 = 3.917, P = 0.047).
Conclusion
Compared with chemotherapy alone, advanced gastric cancer patients with abdominal para-aortic (the 16th) lymph node metastasis could not benefit from gastrectomy combined with chemotherapy.
Key words:
Stomach neoplasms; Drug therapy, combination; Gastrectomy
期刊介绍:
"Cancer Research and Clinic" is a series of magazines of the Chinese Medical Association under the supervision of the National Health Commission and sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association.
It mainly reflects scientific research results and academic trends in the field of malignant tumors. The main columns include monographs, guidelines and consensus, standards and norms, treatises, short treatises, survey reports, reviews, clinical pathology (case) discussions, case reports, etc. The readers are middle- and senior-level medical staff engaged in basic research and clinical work on malignant tumors.