变革对个人工作的影响与员工幸福感:作为领导相关调节因子的角色清晰度和人际公正*

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2021-02-18 DOI:10.1080/14697017.2021.1888771
Birgit Thomson, Johannes Rank, C. Steidelmüller
{"title":"变革对个人工作的影响与员工幸福感:作为领导相关调节因子的角色清晰度和人际公正*","authors":"Birgit Thomson, Johannes Rank, C. Steidelmüller","doi":"10.1080/14697017.2021.1888771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Leadership behaviour plays a key role in terms of change-related well-being and health impact. The objective of this study was to identify leadership determined circumstances which mitigate the potential detrimental effects of the individual job impact of organizational change on well-being outcomes. Based on the Job Demands-Resources Model we explicate two-way and three-way interactions between individual job impact and crucial resources during organizational change provided by leaders (role clarity and interpersonal justice). Specifically, we propose that the combination of these resources will attenuate the relationships between individual job impact and both psychological contract breach/violation and mental ill-health. Field survey data were gathered from 189 employees in a group of hospitals in Germany undergoing restructuring. Only the combination of low demands and high measures of either of the resources was related to favourable criterion levels, implying that the provision of resources is not enough to mitigate negative well-being impact. Rather the increase of demands has to be monitored in phases of change. With high individual job impact, psychological contract violation was low only when both role clarity and interpersonal justice were high (significant three-way interaction). MAD statement This article makes a difference by contributing to the discussion on the central buffering hypothesis of the JDR-M considering the specific context of organizational change. It highlights that drastic individual job impact of change is a particularly difficult scenario for employees in which single or even several combined resources provided by the leader might not be able to buffer followers’ unfavourable well-being impact. We add to change literature by focussing on ‘healthy leadership’ which is relatively underrepresented in research. Our results imply that individual job impact and well-being are important aspects in planning change processes beyond outcomes considered traditionally in Organizational Behaviour Literature.","PeriodicalId":47003,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT","volume":"21 1","pages":"391 - 411"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14697017.2021.1888771","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Individual Job Impact of Change and Employees’ Well-Being: Role Clarity and Interpersonal Justice as Leadership-Related Moderators*\",\"authors\":\"Birgit Thomson, Johannes Rank, C. Steidelmüller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14697017.2021.1888771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Leadership behaviour plays a key role in terms of change-related well-being and health impact. The objective of this study was to identify leadership determined circumstances which mitigate the potential detrimental effects of the individual job impact of organizational change on well-being outcomes. Based on the Job Demands-Resources Model we explicate two-way and three-way interactions between individual job impact and crucial resources during organizational change provided by leaders (role clarity and interpersonal justice). Specifically, we propose that the combination of these resources will attenuate the relationships between individual job impact and both psychological contract breach/violation and mental ill-health. Field survey data were gathered from 189 employees in a group of hospitals in Germany undergoing restructuring. Only the combination of low demands and high measures of either of the resources was related to favourable criterion levels, implying that the provision of resources is not enough to mitigate negative well-being impact. Rather the increase of demands has to be monitored in phases of change. With high individual job impact, psychological contract violation was low only when both role clarity and interpersonal justice were high (significant three-way interaction). MAD statement This article makes a difference by contributing to the discussion on the central buffering hypothesis of the JDR-M considering the specific context of organizational change. It highlights that drastic individual job impact of change is a particularly difficult scenario for employees in which single or even several combined resources provided by the leader might not be able to buffer followers’ unfavourable well-being impact. We add to change literature by focussing on ‘healthy leadership’ which is relatively underrepresented in research. Our results imply that individual job impact and well-being are important aspects in planning change processes beyond outcomes considered traditionally in Organizational Behaviour Literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"391 - 411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14697017.2021.1888771\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1888771\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1888771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

领导行为在变革相关的幸福感和健康影响方面起着关键作用。本研究的目的是确定领导力决定的环境,以减轻组织变革对个人工作影响对幸福感结果的潜在有害影响。基于工作需求-资源模型,我们解释了领导者在组织变革过程中提供的个人工作影响与关键资源(角色明晰和人际公正)之间的双向和三向互动关系。具体而言,我们提出这些资源的组合将减弱个人工作影响与心理契约违约/违反和心理疾病健康之间的关系。实地调查数据来自一组正在进行重组的德国医院的189名员工。只有资源的低需求和高措施的组合与有利的标准水平有关,这意味着资源的提供不足以减轻消极的福祉影响。相反,必须在变化的各个阶段监测需求的增加。当个体工作影响高时,只有当角色清晰度和人际公平度都高时,心理契约违反才会低(显著的三向交互作用)。考虑到组织变革的具体背景,本文通过对JDR-M的中心缓冲假设的讨论做出了贡献,从而有所不同。它强调,变化对个人工作的剧烈影响对员工来说是一个特别困难的情况,在这种情况下,领导者提供的单个甚至几个组合资源可能无法缓冲追随者不利的幸福感影响。我们通过关注“健康的领导力”来增加改变文献,这在研究中相对较少。我们的研究结果表明,个人工作影响和幸福感是规划变革过程的重要方面,超出了组织行为学文献中传统的结果考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Individual Job Impact of Change and Employees’ Well-Being: Role Clarity and Interpersonal Justice as Leadership-Related Moderators*
ABSTRACT Leadership behaviour plays a key role in terms of change-related well-being and health impact. The objective of this study was to identify leadership determined circumstances which mitigate the potential detrimental effects of the individual job impact of organizational change on well-being outcomes. Based on the Job Demands-Resources Model we explicate two-way and three-way interactions between individual job impact and crucial resources during organizational change provided by leaders (role clarity and interpersonal justice). Specifically, we propose that the combination of these resources will attenuate the relationships between individual job impact and both psychological contract breach/violation and mental ill-health. Field survey data were gathered from 189 employees in a group of hospitals in Germany undergoing restructuring. Only the combination of low demands and high measures of either of the resources was related to favourable criterion levels, implying that the provision of resources is not enough to mitigate negative well-being impact. Rather the increase of demands has to be monitored in phases of change. With high individual job impact, psychological contract violation was low only when both role clarity and interpersonal justice were high (significant three-way interaction). MAD statement This article makes a difference by contributing to the discussion on the central buffering hypothesis of the JDR-M considering the specific context of organizational change. It highlights that drastic individual job impact of change is a particularly difficult scenario for employees in which single or even several combined resources provided by the leader might not be able to buffer followers’ unfavourable well-being impact. We add to change literature by focussing on ‘healthy leadership’ which is relatively underrepresented in research. Our results imply that individual job impact and well-being are important aspects in planning change processes beyond outcomes considered traditionally in Organizational Behaviour Literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Journal of Change Management is a multidisciplinary and international forum for critical, mainstream and alternative contributions - focusing as much on psychology, ethics, culture and behaviour as on structure and process. JCM is a platform for open and challenging dialogue and a thorough critique of established as well as alternative practices. JCM is aiming to provide all authors with a first decision within six weeks of submission.
期刊最新文献
Navigating Tensions in the Organizational Change Process towards Hybrid Workspace It’s Not All About the Self: Exploring the Interplay Between Self-leadership and the Social Work Environment ‘Changing the Course of a Super Tanker’: A Study of Senior and Junior Managers’ Enactments of a Transition Narrative What Makes Us See Someone as a Leader? A Field Theory Approach The Fair Share – Multilevel Distributive Justice as Cross-Level Moderator for the Impact of Restructuring Perceptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1