{"title":"变革对个人工作的影响与员工幸福感:作为领导相关调节因子的角色清晰度和人际公正*","authors":"Birgit Thomson, Johannes Rank, C. Steidelmüller","doi":"10.1080/14697017.2021.1888771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Leadership behaviour plays a key role in terms of change-related well-being and health impact. The objective of this study was to identify leadership determined circumstances which mitigate the potential detrimental effects of the individual job impact of organizational change on well-being outcomes. Based on the Job Demands-Resources Model we explicate two-way and three-way interactions between individual job impact and crucial resources during organizational change provided by leaders (role clarity and interpersonal justice). Specifically, we propose that the combination of these resources will attenuate the relationships between individual job impact and both psychological contract breach/violation and mental ill-health. Field survey data were gathered from 189 employees in a group of hospitals in Germany undergoing restructuring. Only the combination of low demands and high measures of either of the resources was related to favourable criterion levels, implying that the provision of resources is not enough to mitigate negative well-being impact. Rather the increase of demands has to be monitored in phases of change. With high individual job impact, psychological contract violation was low only when both role clarity and interpersonal justice were high (significant three-way interaction). MAD statement This article makes a difference by contributing to the discussion on the central buffering hypothesis of the JDR-M considering the specific context of organizational change. It highlights that drastic individual job impact of change is a particularly difficult scenario for employees in which single or even several combined resources provided by the leader might not be able to buffer followers’ unfavourable well-being impact. We add to change literature by focussing on ‘healthy leadership’ which is relatively underrepresented in research. Our results imply that individual job impact and well-being are important aspects in planning change processes beyond outcomes considered traditionally in Organizational Behaviour Literature.","PeriodicalId":47003,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT","volume":"21 1","pages":"391 - 411"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14697017.2021.1888771","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Individual Job Impact of Change and Employees’ Well-Being: Role Clarity and Interpersonal Justice as Leadership-Related Moderators*\",\"authors\":\"Birgit Thomson, Johannes Rank, C. Steidelmüller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14697017.2021.1888771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Leadership behaviour plays a key role in terms of change-related well-being and health impact. The objective of this study was to identify leadership determined circumstances which mitigate the potential detrimental effects of the individual job impact of organizational change on well-being outcomes. Based on the Job Demands-Resources Model we explicate two-way and three-way interactions between individual job impact and crucial resources during organizational change provided by leaders (role clarity and interpersonal justice). Specifically, we propose that the combination of these resources will attenuate the relationships between individual job impact and both psychological contract breach/violation and mental ill-health. Field survey data were gathered from 189 employees in a group of hospitals in Germany undergoing restructuring. Only the combination of low demands and high measures of either of the resources was related to favourable criterion levels, implying that the provision of resources is not enough to mitigate negative well-being impact. Rather the increase of demands has to be monitored in phases of change. With high individual job impact, psychological contract violation was low only when both role clarity and interpersonal justice were high (significant three-way interaction). MAD statement This article makes a difference by contributing to the discussion on the central buffering hypothesis of the JDR-M considering the specific context of organizational change. It highlights that drastic individual job impact of change is a particularly difficult scenario for employees in which single or even several combined resources provided by the leader might not be able to buffer followers’ unfavourable well-being impact. We add to change literature by focussing on ‘healthy leadership’ which is relatively underrepresented in research. Our results imply that individual job impact and well-being are important aspects in planning change processes beyond outcomes considered traditionally in Organizational Behaviour Literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"391 - 411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14697017.2021.1888771\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1888771\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1888771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Individual Job Impact of Change and Employees’ Well-Being: Role Clarity and Interpersonal Justice as Leadership-Related Moderators*
ABSTRACT Leadership behaviour plays a key role in terms of change-related well-being and health impact. The objective of this study was to identify leadership determined circumstances which mitigate the potential detrimental effects of the individual job impact of organizational change on well-being outcomes. Based on the Job Demands-Resources Model we explicate two-way and three-way interactions between individual job impact and crucial resources during organizational change provided by leaders (role clarity and interpersonal justice). Specifically, we propose that the combination of these resources will attenuate the relationships between individual job impact and both psychological contract breach/violation and mental ill-health. Field survey data were gathered from 189 employees in a group of hospitals in Germany undergoing restructuring. Only the combination of low demands and high measures of either of the resources was related to favourable criterion levels, implying that the provision of resources is not enough to mitigate negative well-being impact. Rather the increase of demands has to be monitored in phases of change. With high individual job impact, psychological contract violation was low only when both role clarity and interpersonal justice were high (significant three-way interaction). MAD statement This article makes a difference by contributing to the discussion on the central buffering hypothesis of the JDR-M considering the specific context of organizational change. It highlights that drastic individual job impact of change is a particularly difficult scenario for employees in which single or even several combined resources provided by the leader might not be able to buffer followers’ unfavourable well-being impact. We add to change literature by focussing on ‘healthy leadership’ which is relatively underrepresented in research. Our results imply that individual job impact and well-being are important aspects in planning change processes beyond outcomes considered traditionally in Organizational Behaviour Literature.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Change Management is a multidisciplinary and international forum for critical, mainstream and alternative contributions - focusing as much on psychology, ethics, culture and behaviour as on structure and process. JCM is a platform for open and challenging dialogue and a thorough critique of established as well as alternative practices. JCM is aiming to provide all authors with a first decision within six weeks of submission.