美国和欧盟肉类加工对covid - 19大流行的比较恢复力

IF 6.8 1区经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Food Policy Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102517

Azzeddine Azzam , Ing-Marie Gren , Hans Andersson

{"title":"美国和欧盟肉类加工对covid - 19大流行的比较恢复力","authors":"Azzeddine Azzam , Ing-Marie Gren , Hans Andersson","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the similarities in the drop and recovery patterns of US and EU meat production during the Covid19 pandemic, the literature in the two continents assessed their respective meat processing industries’ resilience differently - resilient in the EU and non-resilient in the US but offered no resilience metrics in support of their assessments. We cast the differing transatlantic views in the context of the economic resilience literature and operationalize several metrics for cattle, pig, and chicken slaughter. We find the US less resilient than the EU in cattle and pig slaughter. Resilience in chicken slaughter depends on which metric is used. We discuss possible drivers of resilience and highlight how our metrics can be used for further research to inform resilience policy on both continents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative resilience of US and EU meat processing to the Covid19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Azzeddine Azzam , Ing-Marie Gren , Hans Andersson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite the similarities in the drop and recovery patterns of US and EU meat production during the Covid19 pandemic, the literature in the two continents assessed their respective meat processing industries’ resilience differently - resilient in the EU and non-resilient in the US but offered no resilience metrics in support of their assessments. We cast the differing transatlantic views in the context of the economic resilience literature and operationalize several metrics for cattle, pig, and chicken slaughter. We find the US less resilient than the EU in cattle and pig slaughter. Resilience in chicken slaughter depends on which metric is used. We discuss possible drivers of resilience and highlight how our metrics can be used for further research to inform resilience policy on both continents.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030691922300115X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030691922300115X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间，美国和欧盟肉类生产的下降和恢复模式相似，但两大洲的文献对各自肉类加工业的弹性进行了不同的评估——欧盟的弹性和美国的非弹性，但没有提供弹性指标来支持他们的评估。我们在经济弹性文献的背景下分析了不同的跨大西洋观点，并对牛、猪和鸡的屠宰实施了几个指标。我们发现，在牛和猪的屠宰方面，美国的弹性不如欧盟。鸡屠宰的弹性取决于使用哪种度量标准。我们讨论了弹性的可能驱动因素，并强调了如何将我们的指标用于进一步的研究，为两大洲的弹性政策提供信息。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Comparative resilience of US and EU meat processing to the Covid19 pandemic

Despite the similarities in the drop and recovery patterns of US and EU meat production during the Covid19 pandemic, the literature in the two continents assessed their respective meat processing industries’ resilience differently - resilient in the EU and non-resilient in the US but offered no resilience metrics in support of their assessments. We cast the differing transatlantic views in the context of the economic resilience literature and operationalize several metrics for cattle, pig, and chicken slaughter. We find the US less resilient than the EU in cattle and pig slaughter. Resilience in chicken slaughter depends on which metric is used. We discuss possible drivers of resilience and highlight how our metrics can be used for further research to inform resilience policy on both continents.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策

CiteScore

11.40

自引率

4.60%

发文量

128

审稿时长

62 days

期刊介绍： Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.