Theoria Cum Praxi–建模专业沟通

Q1 Arts and Humanities Glottotheory Pub Date : 2019-10-25 DOI:10.1515/glot-2018-0010
K. Pelikan, Thorsten Roelcke
{"title":"Theoria Cum Praxi–建模专业沟通","authors":"K. Pelikan, Thorsten Roelcke","doi":"10.1515/glot-2018-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As researchers from different nationalities and disciplines collaborate in research projects with joint grants, science becomes more and more global. For conducting the research, project members from several different professional and national backgrounds work together on a daily basis using English as lingua franca (ELF). This results in a very heterogenic linguistic setting, influenced by several mother tongues and languages for specific purposes (LSPs). Systematic approaches have been neglected during the last years while LSP research moved more and more towards applied approaches working on concrete case studies. The present study follows an alternative approach. Applied linguistics and further development of systematic approaches shall here be seen as a circular flow. For instance, communication optimisation during a case study benefits from system-thinking and vice versa. How could the project language of a case study be structured and which long established classifications need to be revised based on these data? Is there a need for a new understanding of applied LSP research?","PeriodicalId":37792,"journal":{"name":"Glottotheory","volume":"9 1","pages":"147 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/glot-2018-0010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoria Cum Praxi – Modeling Specialised Communication\",\"authors\":\"K. Pelikan, Thorsten Roelcke\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/glot-2018-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract As researchers from different nationalities and disciplines collaborate in research projects with joint grants, science becomes more and more global. For conducting the research, project members from several different professional and national backgrounds work together on a daily basis using English as lingua franca (ELF). This results in a very heterogenic linguistic setting, influenced by several mother tongues and languages for specific purposes (LSPs). Systematic approaches have been neglected during the last years while LSP research moved more and more towards applied approaches working on concrete case studies. The present study follows an alternative approach. Applied linguistics and further development of systematic approaches shall here be seen as a circular flow. For instance, communication optimisation during a case study benefits from system-thinking and vice versa. How could the project language of a case study be structured and which long established classifications need to be revised based on these data? Is there a need for a new understanding of applied LSP research?\",\"PeriodicalId\":37792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Glottotheory\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"147 - 172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/glot-2018-0010\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Glottotheory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/glot-2018-0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glottotheory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/glot-2018-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着来自不同国家、不同学科的科研人员在联合资助下开展科研项目合作,科学的全球化趋势日益明显。为了进行这项研究,来自不同专业和国家背景的项目成员每天使用英语作为通用语言(ELF)一起工作。这导致了一个非常异质的语言环境,受到几种母语和特定用途语言(lsp)的影响。在过去的几年里,系统方法被忽视了,而LSP研究越来越多地转向具体案例研究的应用方法。本研究采用了另一种方法。应用语言学和系统方法的进一步发展在这里应被视为一个循环流动。例如,案例研究期间的沟通优化受益于系统思考,反之亦然。如何构建案例研究的项目语言,哪些长期建立的分类需要根据这些数据进行修订?是否需要对应用LSP研究有新的认识?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Theoria Cum Praxi – Modeling Specialised Communication
Abstract As researchers from different nationalities and disciplines collaborate in research projects with joint grants, science becomes more and more global. For conducting the research, project members from several different professional and national backgrounds work together on a daily basis using English as lingua franca (ELF). This results in a very heterogenic linguistic setting, influenced by several mother tongues and languages for specific purposes (LSPs). Systematic approaches have been neglected during the last years while LSP research moved more and more towards applied approaches working on concrete case studies. The present study follows an alternative approach. Applied linguistics and further development of systematic approaches shall here be seen as a circular flow. For instance, communication optimisation during a case study benefits from system-thinking and vice versa. How could the project language of a case study be structured and which long established classifications need to be revised based on these data? Is there a need for a new understanding of applied LSP research?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Glottotheory
Glottotheory Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The foci of Glottotheory are: observations and descriptions of all aspects of language and text phenomena including the areas of psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, dialectology, pragmatics, etc. on all levels of linguistic analysis, applications of methods, models or findings from quantitative linguistics concerning problems of natural language processing, language teaching, documentation and information retrieval, methodological problems of linguistic measurement, model construction, sampling and test theory, epistemological issues such as explanation of language and text phenomena, contributions to theory construction, systems theory, philosophy of science. The journal considers itself as platform for a dialogue between quantitative and qualitative linguistics.
期刊最新文献
Repräsentation der positiven Basisemotionen in der deutschen digitalen kommunikation Verfasserverweise und Typen wissenschaftssprachlichen Handelns: Eine vergleichende Korpusstudie anhand deutscher und polnischer Abschlussarbeiten Beyond warzones: conflict-stricken states as viewed by the Czech corpus collocations „Sprachkontakte“ aus der Sicht der kontrastiven Linguokulturologie Von der Entlehnung über das Codemeshing bis zum Translanguaging: Prozesse, Ergebnisse und Folgen von Sprachkontakt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1