自然(自然)和体外受精妊娠早期筛选生物标志物的比较

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2021-03-19 DOI:10.34172/cjmb.2022.19
M. Barati, M. Zargar, B. Asan
{"title":"自然(自然)和体外受精妊娠早期筛选生物标志物的比较","authors":"M. Barati, M. Zargar, B. Asan","doi":"10.34172/cjmb.2022.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The present study was designed to evaluate and compare the screening markers of spontaneous and in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies in individuals who underwent combined screening in the first trimester of pregnancy. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we examined the difference between natural and assisted-reproductive technology (ART) pregnancies in 2252 mothers from January 2011 to October 2019. In both groups, the first trimester screening parameters including NT, free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), and PAPP-A were measured. Results: According to the results of the present study, BMI was higher in the group that became pregnant by IVF compared to the normal pregnancy group (P<0.001). Additionally, in patients using IVF, the history of maternal disease was less frequent compared to the other group (P=0.003). Most cases of twin fetuses, dichorionic twin pregnancy, and fetal abnormality were seen in the IVF group. Although the β-hCG and free PAPP-A levels were high in the IVF group, no significant difference was observed. The group with spontaneous pregnancy had a higher penetration rate of nuchal translucency <95th percentile compared to the IVF group (P<0.001). The results of comparing the first trimester test showed that in the IVF group, 81.3% of patients were at low risk and 6.6% were at high risk, while in the normal pregnancy group, 78.9% of patients were at low risk and 7.0% of them were at low risk, indicating that the difference was not significant. Conclusions: Overall, although the risk of aneuploidy in IVF pregnancies was not higher compared to normal pregnancies, in IVF pregnancies, NI is associated with a high risk of fetal abnormalities. Therefore, NT sonography can help to diagnose fetal anomalies especially aneuploidy","PeriodicalId":43540,"journal":{"name":"Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of First-Trimester Screening Biomarkers in Spontaneous (Natural) and In Vitro Fertilization Pregnancies\",\"authors\":\"M. Barati, M. Zargar, B. Asan\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/cjmb.2022.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The present study was designed to evaluate and compare the screening markers of spontaneous and in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies in individuals who underwent combined screening in the first trimester of pregnancy. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we examined the difference between natural and assisted-reproductive technology (ART) pregnancies in 2252 mothers from January 2011 to October 2019. In both groups, the first trimester screening parameters including NT, free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), and PAPP-A were measured. Results: According to the results of the present study, BMI was higher in the group that became pregnant by IVF compared to the normal pregnancy group (P<0.001). Additionally, in patients using IVF, the history of maternal disease was less frequent compared to the other group (P=0.003). Most cases of twin fetuses, dichorionic twin pregnancy, and fetal abnormality were seen in the IVF group. Although the β-hCG and free PAPP-A levels were high in the IVF group, no significant difference was observed. The group with spontaneous pregnancy had a higher penetration rate of nuchal translucency <95th percentile compared to the IVF group (P<0.001). The results of comparing the first trimester test showed that in the IVF group, 81.3% of patients were at low risk and 6.6% were at high risk, while in the normal pregnancy group, 78.9% of patients were at low risk and 7.0% of them were at low risk, indicating that the difference was not significant. Conclusions: Overall, although the risk of aneuploidy in IVF pregnancies was not higher compared to normal pregnancies, in IVF pregnancies, NI is associated with a high risk of fetal abnormalities. Therefore, NT sonography can help to diagnose fetal anomalies especially aneuploidy\",\"PeriodicalId\":43540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/cjmb.2022.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/cjmb.2022.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估和比较在妊娠早期接受联合筛查的个体中自发和体外受精(IVF)妊娠的筛查标志物。材料和方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们检查了2011年1月至2019年10月2252名母亲的自然和辅助生殖技术(ART)妊娠之间的差异。在两组中,测量了孕早期筛查参数,包括NT、游离β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-hCG)和PAPP-A。结果:根据本研究的结果,通过试管婴儿怀孕的组的BMI高于正常妊娠组(P<0.001)。此外,在使用试管婴儿的患者中,与其他组相比,母体疾病的发生率较低(P=0.003)。大多数双胎、双胎妊娠和胎儿异常的情况在试管婴儿组中出现。尽管IVF组的β-hCG和游离PAPP-A水平较高,但没有观察到显著差异。与IVF组相比,自然妊娠组的珠心透光率<95百分位(P<0.001)。比较妊娠早期测试结果显示,IVF组81.3%的患者处于低风险状态,6.6%的患者处于高风险状态,而正常妊娠组78.9%的患者处于中低风险状态,7.0%的患者属于低风险状态,表明差异不显著。结论:总体而言,尽管试管婴儿妊娠中非整倍体的风险并不高于正常妊娠,但在试管婴儿妊娠,NI与胎儿异常的高风险相关。因此,NT超声可以帮助诊断胎儿异常,尤其是非整倍体
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of First-Trimester Screening Biomarkers in Spontaneous (Natural) and In Vitro Fertilization Pregnancies
Objectives: The present study was designed to evaluate and compare the screening markers of spontaneous and in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies in individuals who underwent combined screening in the first trimester of pregnancy. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we examined the difference between natural and assisted-reproductive technology (ART) pregnancies in 2252 mothers from January 2011 to October 2019. In both groups, the first trimester screening parameters including NT, free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), and PAPP-A were measured. Results: According to the results of the present study, BMI was higher in the group that became pregnant by IVF compared to the normal pregnancy group (P<0.001). Additionally, in patients using IVF, the history of maternal disease was less frequent compared to the other group (P=0.003). Most cases of twin fetuses, dichorionic twin pregnancy, and fetal abnormality were seen in the IVF group. Although the β-hCG and free PAPP-A levels were high in the IVF group, no significant difference was observed. The group with spontaneous pregnancy had a higher penetration rate of nuchal translucency <95th percentile compared to the IVF group (P<0.001). The results of comparing the first trimester test showed that in the IVF group, 81.3% of patients were at low risk and 6.6% were at high risk, while in the normal pregnancy group, 78.9% of patients were at low risk and 7.0% of them were at low risk, indicating that the difference was not significant. Conclusions: Overall, although the risk of aneuploidy in IVF pregnancies was not higher compared to normal pregnancies, in IVF pregnancies, NI is associated with a high risk of fetal abnormalities. Therefore, NT sonography can help to diagnose fetal anomalies especially aneuploidy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: All kind of knowledge contributing to the development of science by its content, value, level and originality will be covered by CJMB. Problems of public health and their solutions are at the head of the windows opening us to the world. The "Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences" is a modern forum for scientific communication,coveringall aspects medical sciences and biological sciences, in basic and clinical sciences, mainly including: • Anatomy • Antioxidant Therapy in Reproduction Medicine • Biochemistry • Biophysics • Breast Cancer • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine • Cell Biology • Dentistry sciences • Diabetes • Embryology • Endocrinology • Genetics • Hematology • Herbal Medicine • Histology • Internal Medicine • Internal Medicine, surgery • Medical Education • Medical Laboratory Sciences • Medical Microbiology • Microbiology • Mycology, Neurosciences • Nerosciences • Nutrition • Oncology • Parasitology • Pathology • Pharmacognosy • Pharmacology • Psychiatry • Sex-Based Biology • Sports Medicine • Urogynecology • Virology
期刊最新文献
Determination of the Protective Impact of Hypericum perforatum Extract Against Ovarian Ischemia and Reperfusion in Rats Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Individuals Afflicted by COVID-19 Diagnosing Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Using Triglyceride-Related Indices: Is It Possible Without Rotterdam Criteria? Preservation of Testicular Tissue and Alleviation of Oxidative Stress by Carvacrol Following Torsion/ Detorsion in Adult Male Rats The Effect of Carvacrol Plus Treadmill Exercise on Testis Structure and Oxidative Stress in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1