词汇-语义领域中主导概念的发展[j]

Dmitry L. Gurevich
{"title":"词汇-语义领域中主导概念的发展[j]","authors":"Dmitry L. Gurevich","doi":"10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-3-678-693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"National identity presupposes not only geographical and political-administrative but also cultural-historical and linguistic unity. The country’s name, usually developed from an inderived toponym, can acquire the characteristics of a concept with a wider range of meanings that spreads onto neighbouring spheres and becomes ethnonym, linguonym and, furthermore, a name for a whole group of concrete and abstract notions sharing a common semantic core. As a result, one can observe the formation of a lexical-semantic field with a clear-cut core, secondary dominants, and periphery. Its development is gradual and proceeds as a kind of centrifugal movement: first comes the core and its nearest surroundings, then one can see the periphery grow and become more and more multifarious in terms of parts of speech division. The present study shows how the lexeme BRASIL, that by the time Brazil was colonized (in the first half of the 16th century) had the only meaning - ‘mahogany’, gradually became widely-used and acquired such meanings as “territory”, “indigenous people”, “indigenous language”. These meanings influenced the development of derived words sharing the meaning “related to Brazil”, “Brazilian” and “native of Brazil” - brasílico, brasiliense, brasiliano, brasílio, brasileiro (Portugese). Their use, initially almost interchangeable, became more specific with time; later some of them have become obsolete. As a result, brasileiro became secondary dominant that, alongside with BRASIL, served to widen the corresponding lexical-semantic field. The process of consolidation of the core and central dominants having considerable semantic potential coincided with the process of Brazil’s cultural emancipation from its ex-metropolis.","PeriodicalId":52389,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Development of Dominant Concepts within the Lexical-Semantic Field BRASIL\",\"authors\":\"Dmitry L. Gurevich\",\"doi\":\"10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-3-678-693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"National identity presupposes not only geographical and political-administrative but also cultural-historical and linguistic unity. The country’s name, usually developed from an inderived toponym, can acquire the characteristics of a concept with a wider range of meanings that spreads onto neighbouring spheres and becomes ethnonym, linguonym and, furthermore, a name for a whole group of concrete and abstract notions sharing a common semantic core. As a result, one can observe the formation of a lexical-semantic field with a clear-cut core, secondary dominants, and periphery. Its development is gradual and proceeds as a kind of centrifugal movement: first comes the core and its nearest surroundings, then one can see the periphery grow and become more and more multifarious in terms of parts of speech division. The present study shows how the lexeme BRASIL, that by the time Brazil was colonized (in the first half of the 16th century) had the only meaning - ‘mahogany’, gradually became widely-used and acquired such meanings as “territory”, “indigenous people”, “indigenous language”. These meanings influenced the development of derived words sharing the meaning “related to Brazil”, “Brazilian” and “native of Brazil” - brasílico, brasiliense, brasiliano, brasílio, brasileiro (Portugese). Their use, initially almost interchangeable, became more specific with time; later some of them have become obsolete. As a result, brasileiro became secondary dominant that, alongside with BRASIL, served to widen the corresponding lexical-semantic field. The process of consolidation of the core and central dominants having considerable semantic potential coincided with the process of Brazil’s cultural emancipation from its ex-metropolis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-3-678-693\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-3-678-693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

民族认同不仅以地理和政治管理为前提,而且以文化、历史和语言的统一为前提。国名通常是从一个独立的地名发展而来的,它可以获得一个含义更广泛的概念的特征,并传播到邻近的领域,成为民族名、林国名,此外,它也是一个共享共同语义核心的一整组具体和抽象概念的名称。由此,我们可以观察到一个具有明确核心、次要支配者和外围的词汇语义场的形成。它的发展是渐进的,是一种离心运动:首先是核心及其最近的环境,然后可以看到外围在词性划分方面越来越多样化。本研究表明,在巴西被殖民时(16世纪上半叶),单词“BRASIL”只有“桃花心木”的含义,它是如何逐渐被广泛使用并获得“领土”、“土著人民”、“原住民语言”等含义的。这些含义影响了派生词的发展,这些派生词具有“与巴西有关”、“巴西人”和“巴西本土”的含义——brasílico、brasiliense、brasiliano、brasí的lio、brasileiro(葡萄牙语)。它们的使用,最初几乎可以互换,随着时间的推移变得更加具体;后来它们中的一些已经过时了。因此,brasileiro成为次要优势,与BRASIL一起,有助于拓宽相应的词汇语义领域。具有相当语义潜力的核心和中心支配者的整合过程与巴西从其前大都市中解放文化的过程相吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Development of Dominant Concepts within the Lexical-Semantic Field BRASIL
National identity presupposes not only geographical and political-administrative but also cultural-historical and linguistic unity. The country’s name, usually developed from an inderived toponym, can acquire the characteristics of a concept with a wider range of meanings that spreads onto neighbouring spheres and becomes ethnonym, linguonym and, furthermore, a name for a whole group of concrete and abstract notions sharing a common semantic core. As a result, one can observe the formation of a lexical-semantic field with a clear-cut core, secondary dominants, and periphery. Its development is gradual and proceeds as a kind of centrifugal movement: first comes the core and its nearest surroundings, then one can see the periphery grow and become more and more multifarious in terms of parts of speech division. The present study shows how the lexeme BRASIL, that by the time Brazil was colonized (in the first half of the 16th century) had the only meaning - ‘mahogany’, gradually became widely-used and acquired such meanings as “territory”, “indigenous people”, “indigenous language”. These meanings influenced the development of derived words sharing the meaning “related to Brazil”, “Brazilian” and “native of Brazil” - brasílico, brasiliense, brasiliano, brasílio, brasileiro (Portugese). Their use, initially almost interchangeable, became more specific with time; later some of them have become obsolete. As a result, brasileiro became secondary dominant that, alongside with BRASIL, served to widen the corresponding lexical-semantic field. The process of consolidation of the core and central dominants having considerable semantic potential coincided with the process of Brazil’s cultural emancipation from its ex-metropolis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics
RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Re-thinking Semiotics: a New Categorization of a Sign? Factors of the Dynamics of Language Situations in the Regions of Russia on the example of the Arkhangelsk Region, the Perm Region and the Udmurt Republic Emotions in the Mental and Linguistic Space of Lyric Poems Specifics of Lexical and Grammatical Rules in the Chinese Language Textual Microfields WINTER and MAN in Short Stories by Soviet Writer Yuri Shamshurin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1