近代早期朝鲜精英统治的动态

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies Pub Date : 2017-04-01 DOI:10.21866/ESJEAS.2017.17.1.005
Javier Cha
{"title":"近代早期朝鲜精英统治的动态","authors":"Javier Cha","doi":"10.21866/ESJEAS.2017.17.1.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the major themes in the history of early modern Korea are the ways sajok 士族 aristocrats responded to the peculiar lack of de jure protection of social status (Deuchler 2015a, 397). In Chosŏn (1392–1910), aristocratic status depended on the prestige attached to service in yangban officialdom—that is, the civil and military branches of the central bureaucracy. For an aristocratic house to be recognized as such, at least one male heir had to pass the competitive high-level civil or military examinations and be appointed to one of the eighteen ranks of yangban offices. Before the late sixteenth century, a relatively open regime allowed some upward mobility and the flow of provincials into the capital. In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, however, local sajok aristocrats faced severely limited access to central yangban offices and thus devised alternative strategies of status retention. They created associations and rosters that excluded outsiders, for example, and promoted ideological and cultural activities that distinguished the local sajok from the common folk. Martina Deuchler’s Under the Ancestors’ Eyes: Kinship, Status, and Locality in Premodern Korea examines this historical process in relation to the persistence of what she calls “kinship ideology” in premodern Korea. To an extent, this book continues to explore the societal impact of what she refers to interchangeably as “Confucian,” “patrilineal descent,” and “agnatic” ideology in her 1992 work The Confucian Transformation of Korea: A Study of Society and Ideology. The notion of “kinship ideology” is an extension of this perspective. Deuchler holds that the Korean reading of Confucian philosophy and ritual canon—putatively stricter and more literal than the Chinese reading—provided sajok aristocrats with a powerful means of defending the local and regional status quo. The ideological restructuring of sajok households according to the principles of patrilineal organization allocated extra material resources to the main heir for ritual obligations, abolished uxorilocal marriage, and excluded women from inheritance, among other changes. Such cultural practices added another layer of social distinction at a time when the sajok Javier CHA Leiden University The Dynamics of Elite Domination in Early Modern Korea (Review Essay)","PeriodicalId":41529,"journal":{"name":"Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Dynamics of Elite Domination in Early Modern Korea\",\"authors\":\"Javier Cha\",\"doi\":\"10.21866/ESJEAS.2017.17.1.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the major themes in the history of early modern Korea are the ways sajok 士族 aristocrats responded to the peculiar lack of de jure protection of social status (Deuchler 2015a, 397). In Chosŏn (1392–1910), aristocratic status depended on the prestige attached to service in yangban officialdom—that is, the civil and military branches of the central bureaucracy. For an aristocratic house to be recognized as such, at least one male heir had to pass the competitive high-level civil or military examinations and be appointed to one of the eighteen ranks of yangban offices. Before the late sixteenth century, a relatively open regime allowed some upward mobility and the flow of provincials into the capital. In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, however, local sajok aristocrats faced severely limited access to central yangban offices and thus devised alternative strategies of status retention. They created associations and rosters that excluded outsiders, for example, and promoted ideological and cultural activities that distinguished the local sajok from the common folk. Martina Deuchler’s Under the Ancestors’ Eyes: Kinship, Status, and Locality in Premodern Korea examines this historical process in relation to the persistence of what she calls “kinship ideology” in premodern Korea. To an extent, this book continues to explore the societal impact of what she refers to interchangeably as “Confucian,” “patrilineal descent,” and “agnatic” ideology in her 1992 work The Confucian Transformation of Korea: A Study of Society and Ideology. The notion of “kinship ideology” is an extension of this perspective. Deuchler holds that the Korean reading of Confucian philosophy and ritual canon—putatively stricter and more literal than the Chinese reading—provided sajok aristocrats with a powerful means of defending the local and regional status quo. The ideological restructuring of sajok households according to the principles of patrilineal organization allocated extra material resources to the main heir for ritual obligations, abolished uxorilocal marriage, and excluded women from inheritance, among other changes. Such cultural practices added another layer of social distinction at a time when the sajok Javier CHA Leiden University The Dynamics of Elite Domination in Early Modern Korea (Review Essay)\",\"PeriodicalId\":41529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21866/ESJEAS.2017.17.1.005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21866/ESJEAS.2017.17.1.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近代早期韩国历史的一个主要主题是世族贵族如何应对社会地位缺乏法律保护的特殊情况(Deuchler 2015a, 397)。在Chosŏn(1392-1910)时期,贵族的地位取决于在官场(即中央官僚机构的文武部门)服务所附带的声望。一个贵族家族要被承认为这样的家族,至少有一名男性继承人必须通过竞争激烈的高级文武考试,并被任命为十八级阳班办公室之一。在16世纪晚期之前,相对开放的制度允许一些向上流动和外省人口流入首都。然而,在17世纪和18世纪,地方赛约克贵族面临进入中央阳班办公室的严重限制,因此制定了保留地位的替代策略。例如,他们建立了排斥外来者的协会和名册,并促进了将当地萨约克与普通人区分开来的思想和文化活动。Martina Deuchler的《在祖先的眼皮下:前现代朝鲜的亲属关系、地位和地域》考察了这一历史进程,并将其与她所谓的“亲属意识形态”在前现代朝鲜的持续存在联系起来。在某种程度上,这本书继续探讨了她在1992年的著作《韩国的儒家转型:社会与意识形态研究》中交替提到的“儒家”、“父系血统”和“宗教性”意识形态的社会影响。“亲属意识形态”的概念是这一观点的延伸。Deuchler认为,韩国人对儒家哲学和仪式的解读——假定比中国的解读更严格、更字面化——为萨约克贵族提供了捍卫地方和地区现状的有力手段。根据父系组织原则对沙族家庭进行了思想上的重组,为主要继承人分配了额外的物质资源,以履行仪式义务,废除了外地婚姻,并将妇女排除在继承权之外,以及其他变化。这样的文化习俗在当时又增加了一层社会区别,当时的sajok Javier CHA莱顿大学。近代早期韩国精英统治的动态(评论文章)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Dynamics of Elite Domination in Early Modern Korea
One of the major themes in the history of early modern Korea are the ways sajok 士族 aristocrats responded to the peculiar lack of de jure protection of social status (Deuchler 2015a, 397). In Chosŏn (1392–1910), aristocratic status depended on the prestige attached to service in yangban officialdom—that is, the civil and military branches of the central bureaucracy. For an aristocratic house to be recognized as such, at least one male heir had to pass the competitive high-level civil or military examinations and be appointed to one of the eighteen ranks of yangban offices. Before the late sixteenth century, a relatively open regime allowed some upward mobility and the flow of provincials into the capital. In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, however, local sajok aristocrats faced severely limited access to central yangban offices and thus devised alternative strategies of status retention. They created associations and rosters that excluded outsiders, for example, and promoted ideological and cultural activities that distinguished the local sajok from the common folk. Martina Deuchler’s Under the Ancestors’ Eyes: Kinship, Status, and Locality in Premodern Korea examines this historical process in relation to the persistence of what she calls “kinship ideology” in premodern Korea. To an extent, this book continues to explore the societal impact of what she refers to interchangeably as “Confucian,” “patrilineal descent,” and “agnatic” ideology in her 1992 work The Confucian Transformation of Korea: A Study of Society and Ideology. The notion of “kinship ideology” is an extension of this perspective. Deuchler holds that the Korean reading of Confucian philosophy and ritual canon—putatively stricter and more literal than the Chinese reading—provided sajok aristocrats with a powerful means of defending the local and regional status quo. The ideological restructuring of sajok households according to the principles of patrilineal organization allocated extra material resources to the main heir for ritual obligations, abolished uxorilocal marriage, and excluded women from inheritance, among other changes. Such cultural practices added another layer of social distinction at a time when the sajok Javier CHA Leiden University The Dynamics of Elite Domination in Early Modern Korea (Review Essay)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Royal Authority, Ritual, and the Bureaucratic Career of the Descendants of Li Rusong and Rumei in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Chosŏn The Traditional New Woman and Emerging New Man in Republican China The King's Road: Diplomacy and the Remaking of the Silk Road Hybrid Baihua 白話 as a Third Space: East Asian Anticolonial Writing in Modern China Anatomy of the Superstitious Mind: Subjectivity and Interiority in Two Early Twentieth-Century Rebuttals to Liaozhai's Records of the Strange
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1