将儿童医疗化作为政府战略

IF 4.1 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Society Pub Date : 2021-01-29 DOI:10.5007/2175-7984.2020.E75325
Mauricio Bedoya-Hernández, Pablo Andrés De Francisco-León, Lina Juliedt Mesa Osorio
{"title":"将儿童医疗化作为政府战略","authors":"Mauricio Bedoya-Hernández, Pablo Andrés De Francisco-León, Lina Juliedt Mesa Osorio","doi":"10.5007/2175-7984.2020.E75325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an account of a study whose aim was to know the psychoscientific strategies associated with the production of subjectivity in neoliberalism. The authors used a historicalcritical approach based on the foucauldian studies. Results: (1) the medicalization of life has beena government strategy; (2) the medicalization of childhood -also a government strategy- has gone through three stages, each of which has produced a specific form of subjectivity; (3) three reason for the medicalization of childhood have been found, and (4), psychoscience and bioscience are the discourses that have directed this medicalization. The authors conclude that neoliberalismhas used this medicalization strategy, which was created by the psy sciences, to expand the commodification of life and configure the self-managed subjectivity of the entrepreneur.","PeriodicalId":47847,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La medicalización de la infancia como estrategia de gobierno\",\"authors\":\"Mauricio Bedoya-Hernández, Pablo Andrés De Francisco-León, Lina Juliedt Mesa Osorio\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/2175-7984.2020.E75325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides an account of a study whose aim was to know the psychoscientific strategies associated with the production of subjectivity in neoliberalism. The authors used a historicalcritical approach based on the foucauldian studies. Results: (1) the medicalization of life has beena government strategy; (2) the medicalization of childhood -also a government strategy- has gone through three stages, each of which has produced a specific form of subjectivity; (3) three reason for the medicalization of childhood have been found, and (4), psychoscience and bioscience are the discourses that have directed this medicalization. The authors conclude that neoliberalismhas used this medicalization strategy, which was created by the psy sciences, to expand the commodification of life and configure the self-managed subjectivity of the entrepreneur.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2020.E75325\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2020.E75325","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了一项旨在了解新自由主义中与主体性产生相关的心理科学策略的研究。作者采用了基于傅尔研究的历史批判方法。结果:(1)生命医学化已成为政府的一项战略;(2) 儿童医学化——也是政府的一项战略——经历了三个阶段,每个阶段都产生了特定形式的主体性;(3) 发现了儿童医学化的三个原因。(4)心理科学和生物科学是引导儿童医学化发展的话语。作者得出的结论是,新自由主义者利用这种由心理学创造的医学化策略来扩大生活的商品化,并配置企业家的自我管理主体性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La medicalización de la infancia como estrategia de gobierno
This paper provides an account of a study whose aim was to know the psychoscientific strategies associated with the production of subjectivity in neoliberalism. The authors used a historicalcritical approach based on the foucauldian studies. Results: (1) the medicalization of life has beena government strategy; (2) the medicalization of childhood -also a government strategy- has gone through three stages, each of which has produced a specific form of subjectivity; (3) three reason for the medicalization of childhood have been found, and (4), psychoscience and bioscience are the discourses that have directed this medicalization. The authors conclude that neoliberalismhas used this medicalization strategy, which was created by the psy sciences, to expand the commodification of life and configure the self-managed subjectivity of the entrepreneur.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Society
Politics & Society Multiple-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Politics & Society is a peer-reviewed journal. All submitted papers are read by a rotating editorial board member. If a paper is deemed potentially publishable, it is sent to another board member, who, if agreeing that it is potentially publishable, sends it to a third board member. If and only if all three agree, the paper is sent to the entire editorial board for consideration at board meetings. The editorial board meets three times a year, and the board members who are present (usually between 9 and 14) make decisions through a deliberative process that also considers written reports from absent members. Unlike many journals which rely on 1–3 individual blind referee reports and a single editor with final say, the peers who decide whether to accept submitted work are thus the full editorial board of the journal, comprised of scholars from various disciplines, who discuss papers openly, with author names known, at meetings. Editors are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest when evaluating manuscripts and to recuse themselves from voting if such a potential exists.
期刊最新文献
Bringing Household Finance Back In: House Prices and the Missing Macroeconomics of Comparative Political Economy Who Pays for Environmental Policy? Business Power and the Design of State-Level Climate Policies* Supervising Local Cadres in China: The Quest for Authoritarian Accountability Rethinking Antitrust for the Cloud Era Antitrust and Equal Liberty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1