covid:用于德国医院数字COVID-19诊断的机器学习分类器

IF 2.5 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems Pub Date : 2022-12-24 DOI:10.1145/3567431
C. Bartenschlager, Stefanie S. Ebel, Sebastian Kling, J. Vehreschild, L. Zabel, C. Spinner, Andreas Schuler, Axel R. Heller, S. Borgmann, Reinhard Hoffmann, S. Rieg, H. Messmann, M. Hower, J. Brunner, F. Hanses, C. Römmele
{"title":"covid:用于德国医院数字COVID-19诊断的机器学习分类器","authors":"C. Bartenschlager, Stefanie S. Ebel, Sebastian Kling, J. Vehreschild, L. Zabel, C. Spinner, Andreas Schuler, Axel R. Heller, S. Borgmann, Reinhard Hoffmann, S. Rieg, H. Messmann, M. Hower, J. Brunner, F. Hanses, C. Römmele","doi":"10.1145/3567431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic, it is particularly important to map the course of infection, in terms of patients who have currently tested SARS-CoV-2 positive, as accurately as possible. In hospitals, this is even more important because resources have become scarce. Although polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and point of care (POC) antigen testing capacities have been massively expanded, they are often very time-consuming and cost-intensive and, in some cases, lack appropriate performance. To meet these challenges, we propose the COVIDAL classifier for AI-based diagnosis of symptomatic COVID-19 subjects in hospitals based on laboratory parameters. We evaluate the algorithm's performance by unique multicenter data with approximately 4,000 patients and an extraordinary high ratio of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. We analyze the influence of data preparation, flexibility in optimization targets, as well as the selection of the test set on the COVIDAL outcome. The algorithm is compared with standard AI, PCR, POC antigen testing and manual classifications of seven physicians by a decision theoretic scoring model including performance metrics, turnaround times and cost. Thereby, we define health care settings in which a certain classifier for COVID-19 diagnosis is to be applied. We find sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies of the COVIDAL algorithm of up to 90 percent. Our scoring model suggests using PCR testing for a focus on performance metrics. For turnaround times, POC antigen testing should be used. If balancing performance, turnaround times, and cost is of interest, as, for example, in the emergency department, COVIDAL is superior based on the scoring model.","PeriodicalId":45274,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems","volume":"14 1","pages":"1 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVIDAL: A Machine Learning Classifier for Digital COVID-19 Diagnosis in German Hospitals\",\"authors\":\"C. Bartenschlager, Stefanie S. Ebel, Sebastian Kling, J. Vehreschild, L. Zabel, C. Spinner, Andreas Schuler, Axel R. Heller, S. Borgmann, Reinhard Hoffmann, S. Rieg, H. Messmann, M. Hower, J. Brunner, F. Hanses, C. Römmele\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3567431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic, it is particularly important to map the course of infection, in terms of patients who have currently tested SARS-CoV-2 positive, as accurately as possible. In hospitals, this is even more important because resources have become scarce. Although polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and point of care (POC) antigen testing capacities have been massively expanded, they are often very time-consuming and cost-intensive and, in some cases, lack appropriate performance. To meet these challenges, we propose the COVIDAL classifier for AI-based diagnosis of symptomatic COVID-19 subjects in hospitals based on laboratory parameters. We evaluate the algorithm's performance by unique multicenter data with approximately 4,000 patients and an extraordinary high ratio of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. We analyze the influence of data preparation, flexibility in optimization targets, as well as the selection of the test set on the COVIDAL outcome. The algorithm is compared with standard AI, PCR, POC antigen testing and manual classifications of seven physicians by a decision theoretic scoring model including performance metrics, turnaround times and cost. Thereby, we define health care settings in which a certain classifier for COVID-19 diagnosis is to be applied. We find sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies of the COVIDAL algorithm of up to 90 percent. Our scoring model suggests using PCR testing for a focus on performance metrics. For turnaround times, POC antigen testing should be used. If balancing performance, turnaround times, and cost is of interest, as, for example, in the emergency department, COVIDAL is superior based on the scoring model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3567431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3567431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

为了抗击新冠肺炎大流行,尽可能准确地绘制目前检测出SARS-CoV-2呈阳性的患者的感染过程尤为重要。在医院,这一点更为重要,因为资源已经变得稀缺。尽管聚合酶链式反应(PCR)和护理点(POC)抗原检测能力已经得到了大规模扩展,但它们往往非常耗时和成本密集,在某些情况下缺乏适当的性能。为了应对这些挑战,我们提出了COVIDAL分类器,用于基于实验室参数对医院中有症状的新冠肺炎受试者进行基于AI的诊断。我们通过对大约4000名患者和极高比例的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型阳性患者的独特多中心数据来评估该算法的性能。我们分析了数据准备、优化目标的灵活性以及测试集的选择对COVIDAL结果的影响。通过包括绩效指标、周转时间和成本在内的决策论评分模型,将该算法与标准AI、PCR、POC抗原检测和七名医生的手动分类进行了比较。因此,我们定义了应用新冠肺炎诊断的特定分类器的医疗保健设置。我们发现COVIDAL算法的灵敏度、特异性和准确性高达90%。我们的评分模型建议使用PCR测试来关注绩效指标。对于周转时间,应使用POC抗原检测。如果平衡性能、周转时间和成本是有意义的,例如在急诊科,那么根据评分模型,COVIDAL是优越的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVIDAL: A Machine Learning Classifier for Digital COVID-19 Diagnosis in German Hospitals
For the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic, it is particularly important to map the course of infection, in terms of patients who have currently tested SARS-CoV-2 positive, as accurately as possible. In hospitals, this is even more important because resources have become scarce. Although polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and point of care (POC) antigen testing capacities have been massively expanded, they are often very time-consuming and cost-intensive and, in some cases, lack appropriate performance. To meet these challenges, we propose the COVIDAL classifier for AI-based diagnosis of symptomatic COVID-19 subjects in hospitals based on laboratory parameters. We evaluate the algorithm's performance by unique multicenter data with approximately 4,000 patients and an extraordinary high ratio of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. We analyze the influence of data preparation, flexibility in optimization targets, as well as the selection of the test set on the COVIDAL outcome. The algorithm is compared with standard AI, PCR, POC antigen testing and manual classifications of seven physicians by a decision theoretic scoring model including performance metrics, turnaround times and cost. Thereby, we define health care settings in which a certain classifier for COVID-19 diagnosis is to be applied. We find sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies of the COVIDAL algorithm of up to 90 percent. Our scoring model suggests using PCR testing for a focus on performance metrics. For turnaround times, POC antigen testing should be used. If balancing performance, turnaround times, and cost is of interest, as, for example, in the emergency department, COVIDAL is superior based on the scoring model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
From Dissonance to Dialogue: A Token-Based Approach to Bridge the Gap Between Manufacturers and Customers A Process Mining Method for Inter-organizational Business Process Integration Introduction to the Special Issue on IT-enabled Business Management and Decision Making in the (Post) Covid-19 Era Non-Monotonic Generation of Knowledge Paths for Context Understanding How Should Enterprises Quantify and Analyze (Multi-Party) APT Cyber-Risk Exposure in their Industrial IoT Network?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1