不同能力水平的希伯来语和阿拉伯语使用者的英语阅读和拼写过程:异同

Q1 Arts and Humanities Writing Systems Research Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.1080/17586801.2020.1751773
Susie Russak
{"title":"不同能力水平的希伯来语和阿拉伯语使用者的英语阅读和拼写过程:异同","authors":"Susie Russak","doi":"10.1080/17586801.2020.1751773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present study examined reading and spelling of regular and irregular words in English as a foreign language (EFL) amongst 4th-grade native Arabic and Hebrew speakers. The reading and spelling tasks was drawn from the same pool of lexical items, which were categorised based on how closely they adhered to basic grapheme-phoneme correspondences (regular/irregular). Results showed overall reading scores were higher than spelling scores. Arabic speakers outperformed Hebrew speakers on the word reading task, indicating a potential multilingual advantage. No difference was found between the language groups on word spelling. Irregular words received higher scores than regular words on the reading task whereas opposite results were found for the spelling task, with regular words receiving higher scores than irregular words. When the participants were divided into good and poor ability groups, the three-way interaction indicated that whilst language and word regularity were not related to word reading within the good group, within the poor group irregular words were read with higher accuracy scores. The applicability of existing theoretical models of reading and spelling development for English L1 is considered in light of these cross-linguistic findings. Pedagogical implications relating to differences between language and ability groups are discussed.","PeriodicalId":39225,"journal":{"name":"Writing Systems Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"110 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17586801.2020.1751773","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading and spelling processes in EFL amongst Hebrew and Arabic speakers of differing ability levels: similarities and differences\",\"authors\":\"Susie Russak\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17586801.2020.1751773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The present study examined reading and spelling of regular and irregular words in English as a foreign language (EFL) amongst 4th-grade native Arabic and Hebrew speakers. The reading and spelling tasks was drawn from the same pool of lexical items, which were categorised based on how closely they adhered to basic grapheme-phoneme correspondences (regular/irregular). Results showed overall reading scores were higher than spelling scores. Arabic speakers outperformed Hebrew speakers on the word reading task, indicating a potential multilingual advantage. No difference was found between the language groups on word spelling. Irregular words received higher scores than regular words on the reading task whereas opposite results were found for the spelling task, with regular words receiving higher scores than irregular words. When the participants were divided into good and poor ability groups, the three-way interaction indicated that whilst language and word regularity were not related to word reading within the good group, within the poor group irregular words were read with higher accuracy scores. The applicability of existing theoretical models of reading and spelling development for English L1 is considered in light of these cross-linguistic findings. Pedagogical implications relating to differences between language and ability groups are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Writing Systems Research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"110 - 123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17586801.2020.1751773\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Writing Systems Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2020.1751773\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Writing Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2020.1751773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究调查了四年级母语为阿拉伯语和希伯来语的人在英语作为外语(EFL)中规则和不规则单词的阅读和拼写。阅读和拼写任务是从同一组词汇项目中抽取的,根据它们与基本的字形-音素对应关系(规则/不规则)的紧密程度进行分类。结果显示,总体阅读分数高于拼写分数。说阿拉伯语的人在单词阅读任务上的表现优于说希伯来语的人,这表明他们具有潜在的多语言优势。语言组之间在单词拼写上没有发现差异。在阅读任务中,不规则单词比规则单词得分更高,而在拼写任务中,结果正好相反,规则单词比不规则单词得分更高。当参与者被分成能力好的组和能力差的组时,三方互动表明,在能力好的组中,语言和单词的规律性与单词阅读无关,而在能力差的组中,不规则单词的阅读准确率更高。根据这些跨语言的研究结果,我们考虑了现有的阅读和拼写发展理论模型对英语第一语言的适用性。讨论了语言和能力群体之间差异的教学含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reading and spelling processes in EFL amongst Hebrew and Arabic speakers of differing ability levels: similarities and differences
ABSTRACT The present study examined reading and spelling of regular and irregular words in English as a foreign language (EFL) amongst 4th-grade native Arabic and Hebrew speakers. The reading and spelling tasks was drawn from the same pool of lexical items, which were categorised based on how closely they adhered to basic grapheme-phoneme correspondences (regular/irregular). Results showed overall reading scores were higher than spelling scores. Arabic speakers outperformed Hebrew speakers on the word reading task, indicating a potential multilingual advantage. No difference was found between the language groups on word spelling. Irregular words received higher scores than regular words on the reading task whereas opposite results were found for the spelling task, with regular words receiving higher scores than irregular words. When the participants were divided into good and poor ability groups, the three-way interaction indicated that whilst language and word regularity were not related to word reading within the good group, within the poor group irregular words were read with higher accuracy scores. The applicability of existing theoretical models of reading and spelling development for English L1 is considered in light of these cross-linguistic findings. Pedagogical implications relating to differences between language and ability groups are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Writing Systems Research
Writing Systems Research Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Language ideologies of the transcription system Zhuyin fuhao: a symbol of Taiwanese identity Transcoding number words by bilingual speakers of Arabic: writing multi-digit numbers in a units-decades inverting language Writing between languages: the case of Arabizi Spelling patterns of German 4th graders in French vowels: insights into spelling solutions within and across two alphabetic writing systems Literacy and the language awareness hypothesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1