利用生物强化法从水稻废弃物中制备有机肥策略的评价

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS BioEnergy Research Pub Date : 2023-08-12 DOI:10.1007/s12155-023-10648-w
Trupti K. Vyas, Kamlesh G. Patel, Prachi Desai, Avantika R. Patel, Anand R. Kaswala
{"title":"利用生物强化法从水稻废弃物中制备有机肥策略的评价","authors":"Trupti K. Vyas,&nbsp;Kamlesh G. Patel,&nbsp;Prachi Desai,&nbsp;Avantika R. Patel,&nbsp;Anand R. Kaswala","doi":"10.1007/s12155-023-10648-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Organic manure is prepared using various methods, but comparative efficiency is not reported yet. The present study aims to evaluate three methods viz. method developed by Narayan Deotao Pandharipande (NADEP), structured pit, and heap method for organic manure preparation from paddy waste. The bioaugmentation strategy was also used to enhance natural attenuation and shorten the period for manure preparation. Parameters like nitrogen, C:N ratio, degradation rates, cellulose and lignin content, and total bacterial and fungal count were monitored at 20 days intervals up to 120 days. The highest degradation 53.7% was observed in NADEP compared to other methods. Lower C:N ratio of 18.06 was reported in NADEP on 120 days. The lowest cellulose content 17.14% and lignin content 8.37% were found in NADEP on 120 days. In various methods, the half-life of cellulose was lower in the structured pit at 110 days and in bioaugmented methods at 113 days. The half-life of lignin was lower in the structure pit at 91 days and in bioaugmented methods at 96 days. Factorial completely randomized design (CRD) design revealed that NADEP was better than the structured pit and heap methods. Bioaugmented methods showed a significant difference in time reduction compared to control. Thus, among the three methods tested for organic manure preparation, NADEP showed promising results surpassing manure quality of the structured pit and heap method. Hence, farmers are advised to use the NADEP method to prepare good-quality organic manure in a short period using a bioaugmentation strategy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":487,"journal":{"name":"BioEnergy Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"96 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Organic Manure Preparation Strategies from Paddy Waste Using Bioaugmentation Approach\",\"authors\":\"Trupti K. Vyas,&nbsp;Kamlesh G. Patel,&nbsp;Prachi Desai,&nbsp;Avantika R. Patel,&nbsp;Anand R. Kaswala\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12155-023-10648-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Organic manure is prepared using various methods, but comparative efficiency is not reported yet. The present study aims to evaluate three methods viz. method developed by Narayan Deotao Pandharipande (NADEP), structured pit, and heap method for organic manure preparation from paddy waste. The bioaugmentation strategy was also used to enhance natural attenuation and shorten the period for manure preparation. Parameters like nitrogen, C:N ratio, degradation rates, cellulose and lignin content, and total bacterial and fungal count were monitored at 20 days intervals up to 120 days. The highest degradation 53.7% was observed in NADEP compared to other methods. Lower C:N ratio of 18.06 was reported in NADEP on 120 days. The lowest cellulose content 17.14% and lignin content 8.37% were found in NADEP on 120 days. In various methods, the half-life of cellulose was lower in the structured pit at 110 days and in bioaugmented methods at 113 days. The half-life of lignin was lower in the structure pit at 91 days and in bioaugmented methods at 96 days. Factorial completely randomized design (CRD) design revealed that NADEP was better than the structured pit and heap methods. Bioaugmented methods showed a significant difference in time reduction compared to control. Thus, among the three methods tested for organic manure preparation, NADEP showed promising results surpassing manure quality of the structured pit and heap method. Hence, farmers are advised to use the NADEP method to prepare good-quality organic manure in a short period using a bioaugmentation strategy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioEnergy Research\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"96 - 106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioEnergy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12155-023-10648-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioEnergy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12155-023-10648-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有机肥料的制备方法多种多样,但尚未有关于效率比较的报道。本研究旨在对三种方法进行评估,即 Narayan Deotao Pandharipande(NADEP)开发的方法、结构坑法和堆肥法。此外,还采用了生物增量策略,以加强自然衰减并缩短肥料制备时间。每隔 20 天监测氮、碳氮比、降解率、纤维素和木质素含量、细菌和真菌总数等参数,直至 120 天。与其他方法相比,NADEP 的降解率最高,达到 53.7%。在 120 天内,NADEP 的 C:N 比率较低,为 18.06。NADEP 在 120 天内的纤维素含量最低,为 17.14%,木质素含量最低,为 8.37%。在各种方法中,纤维素的半衰期在结构化坑中较短,为 110 天,在生物增量法中较短,为 113 天。木质素的半衰期在结构坑中较短,为 91 天,而在生物增量法中较短,为 96 天。因子完全随机设计(CRD)显示,NADEP 比结构坑法和堆肥法更好。与对照组相比,生物增殖法在缩短时间方面有显著差异。因此,在测试的三种有机肥料制备方法中,NADEP 显示出良好的效果,其肥料质量超过了结构化粪坑和堆肥法。因此,建议农民使用 NADEP 方法,利用生物增量策略在短时间内制备出优质有机肥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Organic Manure Preparation Strategies from Paddy Waste Using Bioaugmentation Approach

Organic manure is prepared using various methods, but comparative efficiency is not reported yet. The present study aims to evaluate three methods viz. method developed by Narayan Deotao Pandharipande (NADEP), structured pit, and heap method for organic manure preparation from paddy waste. The bioaugmentation strategy was also used to enhance natural attenuation and shorten the period for manure preparation. Parameters like nitrogen, C:N ratio, degradation rates, cellulose and lignin content, and total bacterial and fungal count were monitored at 20 days intervals up to 120 days. The highest degradation 53.7% was observed in NADEP compared to other methods. Lower C:N ratio of 18.06 was reported in NADEP on 120 days. The lowest cellulose content 17.14% and lignin content 8.37% were found in NADEP on 120 days. In various methods, the half-life of cellulose was lower in the structured pit at 110 days and in bioaugmented methods at 113 days. The half-life of lignin was lower in the structure pit at 91 days and in bioaugmented methods at 96 days. Factorial completely randomized design (CRD) design revealed that NADEP was better than the structured pit and heap methods. Bioaugmented methods showed a significant difference in time reduction compared to control. Thus, among the three methods tested for organic manure preparation, NADEP showed promising results surpassing manure quality of the structured pit and heap method. Hence, farmers are advised to use the NADEP method to prepare good-quality organic manure in a short period using a bioaugmentation strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BioEnergy Research
BioEnergy Research ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
174
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BioEnergy Research fills a void in the rapidly growing area of feedstock biology research related to biomass, biofuels, and bioenergy. The journal publishes a wide range of articles, including peer-reviewed scientific research, reviews, perspectives and commentary, industry news, and government policy updates. Its coverage brings together a uniquely broad combination of disciplines with a common focus on feedstock biology and science, related to biomass, biofeedstock, and bioenergy production.
期刊最新文献
Third-Generation L-Lactic Acid Biorefinery Approaches: Exploring the Viability of Macroalgae Detritus Microalga Growth-Promoting Bacteria as Strategy to Improve CO2 Removal from Biogas Micro-Raman Spectroscopy Explains the Population-Scale Heterogeneity in Lipid Profile in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Cultivated Under Single-Stage and Two-Stage Salt Stress Exergy Analysis of Integrated Methanol and Dimethyl-Ether Co-production Towards Net Zero Waste Emission Biomass Valorization for Bioenergy Production: Current Techniques, Challenges, and Pathways to Solutions for Sustainable Bioeconomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1