孩子们知道什么吗?3岁儿童知道普通话中wh短语的歧义

IF 1.3 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Acquisition Pub Date : 2022-05-13 DOI:10.1080/10489223.2021.2020275
Yu’an Yang, Daniel Goodhue, V. Hacquard, J. Lidz
{"title":"孩子们知道什么吗?3岁儿童知道普通话中wh短语的歧义","authors":"Yu’an Yang, Daniel Goodhue, V. Hacquard, J. Lidz","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2021.2020275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Wh-phrases in Mandarin have an interrogative (like English what) and an indefinite (like English a/some) interpretation. Previous comprehension studies find that children can access both interpretations around 4.5 years old; studies with younger children focus on production and find that children between 2 and 4.5 do not reliably produce the indefinite interpretation in naturalistic speech or in elicited imitation tasks. In this article, we use comprehension tasks to examine 3-year-olds’ interpretation of wh-phrases. We find that they have adult-like interpretations of wh-phrases in two different contexts: in dou -sentences (Experiment 1), where the indefinite interpretation is the only available interpretation and the whole sentence receives a universal reading (roughly equivalent to English any), and in negated sentences (Experiment 2), where the interpretation of wh-phrases depends on prosodic prominence and the indefinite interpretation leads to an existential reading of the sentence.","PeriodicalId":46920,"journal":{"name":"Language Acquisition","volume":"29 1","pages":"296 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do children know whanything? 3-year-olds know the ambiguity of wh-phrases in Mandarin\",\"authors\":\"Yu’an Yang, Daniel Goodhue, V. Hacquard, J. Lidz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10489223.2021.2020275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Wh-phrases in Mandarin have an interrogative (like English what) and an indefinite (like English a/some) interpretation. Previous comprehension studies find that children can access both interpretations around 4.5 years old; studies with younger children focus on production and find that children between 2 and 4.5 do not reliably produce the indefinite interpretation in naturalistic speech or in elicited imitation tasks. In this article, we use comprehension tasks to examine 3-year-olds’ interpretation of wh-phrases. We find that they have adult-like interpretations of wh-phrases in two different contexts: in dou -sentences (Experiment 1), where the indefinite interpretation is the only available interpretation and the whole sentence receives a universal reading (roughly equivalent to English any), and in negated sentences (Experiment 2), where the interpretation of wh-phrases depends on prosodic prominence and the indefinite interpretation leads to an existential reading of the sentence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Acquisition\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"296 - 326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Acquisition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2021.2020275\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2021.2020275","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要普通话中的Wh短语有疑问(像英语中的what)和不定(像英语的a/some)两种解释。先前的理解研究发现,儿童在4.5岁左右可以获得这两种解释;对年龄较小的儿童进行的研究集中在生产上,发现2至4.5岁的儿童在自然言语或引发的模仿任务中不能可靠地产生不确定的解释。在这篇文章中,我们使用理解任务来检查3岁儿童对wh短语的解释。我们发现,在两种不同的语境中,他们对wh短语有着成人式的解释:在双句(实验1)中,不定解释是唯一可用的解释,整个句子都得到了普遍的阅读(大致相当于英语中的any);在否定句(实验2)中,其中wh短语的解释取决于韵律的突出性,而不确定的解释导致了对句子的存在性阅读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do children know whanything? 3-year-olds know the ambiguity of wh-phrases in Mandarin
ABSTRACT Wh-phrases in Mandarin have an interrogative (like English what) and an indefinite (like English a/some) interpretation. Previous comprehension studies find that children can access both interpretations around 4.5 years old; studies with younger children focus on production and find that children between 2 and 4.5 do not reliably produce the indefinite interpretation in naturalistic speech or in elicited imitation tasks. In this article, we use comprehension tasks to examine 3-year-olds’ interpretation of wh-phrases. We find that they have adult-like interpretations of wh-phrases in two different contexts: in dou -sentences (Experiment 1), where the indefinite interpretation is the only available interpretation and the whole sentence receives a universal reading (roughly equivalent to English any), and in negated sentences (Experiment 2), where the interpretation of wh-phrases depends on prosodic prominence and the indefinite interpretation leads to an existential reading of the sentence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The research published in Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics makes a clear contribution to linguistic theory by increasing our understanding of how language is acquired. The journal focuses on the acquisition of syntax, semantics, phonology, and morphology, and considers theoretical, experimental, and computational perspectives. Coverage includes solutions to the logical problem of language acquisition, as it arises for particular grammatical proposals; discussion of acquisition data relevant to current linguistic questions; and perspectives derived from theory-driven studies of second language acquisition, language-impaired speakers, and other domains of cognition.
期刊最新文献
Wh-word acquisition in Czech: Exploring the growing trees hypothesis Why second-language speakers sometimes, but not always, derive scalar inferences like first-language speakers: Effects of task demands Subject position in Greek and Spanish monolingual and bilingual production: Exploring the influence of verb type and definiteness Mandarin non-interrogative wh-words distinguished between children with Developmental Language Disorder and Language-Impaired autistic children Children’s early negative auxiliaries are true auxiliaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1