计算思维的评估:保存教师知识和信念的研究

Qing Li, S. McNary, T. Boyd
{"title":"计算思维的评估:保存教师知识和信念的研究","authors":"Qing Li, S. McNary, T. Boyd","doi":"10.30958/ajs.10-2-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aiming to bridge the gap in the field of computational thinking and computing education, this study examines preservice teachers’ knowledge of and self-efficacy related to CT assessment. It also develops a reliable instrument to understand the construct of teacher assessment of CT. Specifically, the research questions focus on investigating the extent of preservice teachers’ knowledge and level of self-efficacy of CT assessment, and identifying the difference between demographic variables on teacher knowledge and self-efficacy related to CT assessment. Adopting a cross-sectional survey design, the participants were 182 preservice teachers. Both descriptive statistics and Exploratory Factor Analysis were used to analyze the data. The results show that the preservice teachers know little about how to use CT assessment to help students, and they believe they know even less about using specific assessment techniques to accomplish assessment. Keywords: computational thinking, assessment, teacher knowledge, teacher self-efficacy","PeriodicalId":91843,"journal":{"name":"Athens journal of sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Computational Thinking: A Study of Preservice Teachers’ Knowledge and Beliefs\",\"authors\":\"Qing Li, S. McNary, T. Boyd\",\"doi\":\"10.30958/ajs.10-2-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aiming to bridge the gap in the field of computational thinking and computing education, this study examines preservice teachers’ knowledge of and self-efficacy related to CT assessment. It also develops a reliable instrument to understand the construct of teacher assessment of CT. Specifically, the research questions focus on investigating the extent of preservice teachers’ knowledge and level of self-efficacy of CT assessment, and identifying the difference between demographic variables on teacher knowledge and self-efficacy related to CT assessment. Adopting a cross-sectional survey design, the participants were 182 preservice teachers. Both descriptive statistics and Exploratory Factor Analysis were used to analyze the data. The results show that the preservice teachers know little about how to use CT assessment to help students, and they believe they know even less about using specific assessment techniques to accomplish assessment. Keywords: computational thinking, assessment, teacher knowledge, teacher self-efficacy\",\"PeriodicalId\":91843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Athens journal of sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Athens journal of sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajs.10-2-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Athens journal of sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajs.10-2-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了弥合计算思维和计算教育领域的差距,本研究考察了职前教师对CT评估的知识和自我效能感。具体而言,研究问题侧重于调查职前教师对CT评估的知识程度和自我效能水平,并确定教师知识的人口学变量与CT评估相关的自我效能之间的差异。采用横断面调查设计,参与者为182名职前教师。采用描述性统计和探索性因素分析对数据进行分析。结果表明,职前教师对如何使用CT评估来帮助学生知之甚少,他们认为自己对使用特定的评估技术来完成评估知之甚少。关键词:计算思维、评估、教师知识、教师自我效能感
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Computational Thinking: A Study of Preservice Teachers’ Knowledge and Beliefs
Aiming to bridge the gap in the field of computational thinking and computing education, this study examines preservice teachers’ knowledge of and self-efficacy related to CT assessment. It also develops a reliable instrument to understand the construct of teacher assessment of CT. Specifically, the research questions focus on investigating the extent of preservice teachers’ knowledge and level of self-efficacy of CT assessment, and identifying the difference between demographic variables on teacher knowledge and self-efficacy related to CT assessment. Adopting a cross-sectional survey design, the participants were 182 preservice teachers. Both descriptive statistics and Exploratory Factor Analysis were used to analyze the data. The results show that the preservice teachers know little about how to use CT assessment to help students, and they believe they know even less about using specific assessment techniques to accomplish assessment. Keywords: computational thinking, assessment, teacher knowledge, teacher self-efficacy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Growth of Crayfish, which Serves as an Indicator of Clean and Healthy Water Ecosystems in the Mediterranean Region Identifying Sustainability Efforts in Company’s Reports Using Text Mining and Machine Learning Generative Urban Design in the Field of Infrastructure: An Optimizing Solution for Connecting Fier and Vlora County by a 600 m Bridge over Selenica River, Albania Infrastructures of Large-Scale Geothermal Energy Projects in Kenya: Materialization, Generativity, and Socio-Economic Development Linkages An Analysis of Stream Flow and Flood Frequency: A Case Study from Downstream of Kelani River Basin, Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1