森林的多元价值与集体能力的形成:墨西哥社区林业的经验教训

IF 2.4 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Sociology Pub Date : 2022-10-30 DOI:10.1080/23251042.2022.2135063
Violeta Gutiérrez-Zamora, I. Mustalahti, Diego García-Osorio
{"title":"森林的多元价值与集体能力的形成:墨西哥社区林业的经验教训","authors":"Violeta Gutiérrez-Zamora, I. Mustalahti, Diego García-Osorio","doi":"10.1080/23251042.2022.2135063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Community forestry has been suggested as a viable alternative to balance the needs of people and forest sustainability. Drawing upon analytical frameworks of environmental justice, we explore how community forestry has reshaped the plural values of forest and the collective capacities of communities. Based on an ethnographic study in a community in Oaxaca, we investigate the plural values of forests presented in the daily practices of community members and how such values are recognized in decision-making spaces. In our analysis two key aspects are considered: deliberation and social accountability. The study shows that deliberation in the community has mainly focused on assessing the instrumental values placed on the forest and expanding the economic capacities of the community. Social accountability is prominent in the community but is still limited due to limited access of community members to accountability in multilevel governance. We conclude that deliberation and social accountability as collective capacities are crucial for evaluating the actions and performances of the authorities and representatives, and for appraisal of the shared values community members hold of forests. Yet the exclusion of women from spaces of decision-making limits the recognition of the plural values of forests.","PeriodicalId":54173,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plural values of forests and the formation of collective capabilities: learnings from Mexico’s community forestry\",\"authors\":\"Violeta Gutiérrez-Zamora, I. Mustalahti, Diego García-Osorio\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23251042.2022.2135063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Community forestry has been suggested as a viable alternative to balance the needs of people and forest sustainability. Drawing upon analytical frameworks of environmental justice, we explore how community forestry has reshaped the plural values of forest and the collective capacities of communities. Based on an ethnographic study in a community in Oaxaca, we investigate the plural values of forests presented in the daily practices of community members and how such values are recognized in decision-making spaces. In our analysis two key aspects are considered: deliberation and social accountability. The study shows that deliberation in the community has mainly focused on assessing the instrumental values placed on the forest and expanding the economic capacities of the community. Social accountability is prominent in the community but is still limited due to limited access of community members to accountability in multilevel governance. We conclude that deliberation and social accountability as collective capacities are crucial for evaluating the actions and performances of the authorities and representatives, and for appraisal of the shared values community members hold of forests. Yet the exclusion of women from spaces of decision-making limits the recognition of the plural values of forests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Sociology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2022.2135063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2022.2135063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要社区林业已被建议作为一种可行的替代方案,以平衡人们的需求和森林的可持续性。利用环境正义的分析框架,我们探讨了社区林业如何重塑森林的多元价值观和社区的集体能力。基于对瓦哈卡州一个社区的民族志研究,我们调查了社区成员日常实践中森林的多元价值观,以及这些价值观是如何在决策空间中得到认可的。在我们的分析中,考虑了两个关键方面:审议和社会责任。研究表明,社区的审议主要集中在评估森林的工具价值和扩大社区的经济能力上。社会问责制在社区中很突出,但由于社区成员在多级治理中获得问责制的机会有限,因此仍然有限。我们的结论是,审议和社会问责作为集体能力,对于评估当局和代表的行动和表现,以及评估社区成员对森林的共同价值观至关重要。然而,将妇女排除在决策空间之外,限制了对森林多元价值的承认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Plural values of forests and the formation of collective capabilities: learnings from Mexico’s community forestry
ABSTRACT Community forestry has been suggested as a viable alternative to balance the needs of people and forest sustainability. Drawing upon analytical frameworks of environmental justice, we explore how community forestry has reshaped the plural values of forest and the collective capacities of communities. Based on an ethnographic study in a community in Oaxaca, we investigate the plural values of forests presented in the daily practices of community members and how such values are recognized in decision-making spaces. In our analysis two key aspects are considered: deliberation and social accountability. The study shows that deliberation in the community has mainly focused on assessing the instrumental values placed on the forest and expanding the economic capacities of the community. Social accountability is prominent in the community but is still limited due to limited access of community members to accountability in multilevel governance. We conclude that deliberation and social accountability as collective capacities are crucial for evaluating the actions and performances of the authorities and representatives, and for appraisal of the shared values community members hold of forests. Yet the exclusion of women from spaces of decision-making limits the recognition of the plural values of forests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Sociology
Environmental Sociology ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Environmental Sociology is dedicated to applying and advancing the sociological imagination in relation to a wide variety of environmental challenges, controversies and issues, at every level from the global to local, from ‘world culture’ to diverse local perspectives. As an international, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, Environmental Sociology aims to stretch the conceptual and theoretical boundaries of both environmental and mainstream sociology, to highlight the relevance of sociological research for environmental policy and management, to disseminate the results of sociological research, and to engage in productive dialogue and debate with other disciplines in the social, natural and ecological sciences. Contributions may utilize a variety of theoretical orientations including, but not restricted to: critical theory, cultural sociology, ecofeminism, ecological modernization, environmental justice, organizational sociology, political ecology, political economy, post-colonial studies, risk theory, social psychology, science and technology studies, globalization, world-systems analysis, and so on. Cross- and transdisciplinary contributions are welcome where they demonstrate a novel attempt to understand social-ecological relationships in a manner that engages with the core concerns of sociology in social relationships, institutions, practices and processes. All methodological approaches in the environmental social sciences – qualitative, quantitative, integrative, spatial, policy analysis, etc. – are welcomed. Environmental Sociology welcomes high-quality submissions from scholars around the world.
期刊最新文献
Place-based understanding of Chilika fishery: power, affect, and materiality When water policies derail livelihood aspirations: farmers’ agency in everyday politics in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta Driving environmental inequality: the unequal harms and benefits of highways Acting on climate change concerns: lay perceptions of possibility, complexity and constraint Is an urban waste-to-energy plant a “green” megaproject? The power of narratives in shaping the city: a Danish case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1