W. Ebeid, A. A. Abdel Latif, A. Mousa, Mohammad Akram Awwad
{"title":"原发性开角型青光眼手术与小梁切除术治疗的远期疗效","authors":"W. Ebeid, A. A. Abdel Latif, A. Mousa, Mohammad Akram Awwad","doi":"10.4103/ejos.ejos_95_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To assess the long-term outcome of Stab incision glaucoma surgery (SIGS) and compare it with subscleral trabeculectomy (SST) in the management of open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods Twenty eyes of 20 OAG patients were randomly assigned into group 1: 10 patients underwent SIGS + Mitomycin C (MMC), and group 2: 10 patients underwent SST + MMC. The patients were followed-up over 2 years after surgery. Our outcome measures were: Postoperative intraocular pressure IOP, number of medications used, and postoperative complications. Results Twenty-four months postoperatively, the mean IOP was 13.78±2.05 mmHg in the SIGS group compared with preoperative IOP of 26.33±5.1 mmHg (P <0.001, paired t-test), and 14.38±4.56 mmHg in SST group compared with preoperative IOP of 30.13±7.51 mmHg (P <0.001, paired t-test). No significant differences in mean IOP between groups either preoperatively (P=0.15) or along follow-up (P=0.62 at last visit). The mean IOP drop from baseline was 12.56±5.00 mmHg (46.33±10.50%) in SIGS group and 15.75±8.22 mmHg (49.50±17.95%) in SST group (P=0.26). A significant decrease in the number of glaucoma medications was noted in the SIGSS group (P <0.001), in the SST group, the number decreased but was not statistically significant (P =0.120). Conclusion SIGS is comparable with SST in achieving long-term significant and maintained IOP reduction over up to 2 years, in addition to decreasing the number of antiglaucoma medications postoperatively. SIGS is recommended for surgical management of primary OAG as it has the advantage of being a faster, easier, less traumatic alternative to conventional SST with fewer complications.","PeriodicalId":31572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","volume":"116 1","pages":"129 - 135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term outcome of stab incision glaucoma surgery versus trabeculectomy surgery in the management of primary open angle glaucoma\",\"authors\":\"W. Ebeid, A. A. Abdel Latif, A. Mousa, Mohammad Akram Awwad\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ejos.ejos_95_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose To assess the long-term outcome of Stab incision glaucoma surgery (SIGS) and compare it with subscleral trabeculectomy (SST) in the management of open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods Twenty eyes of 20 OAG patients were randomly assigned into group 1: 10 patients underwent SIGS + Mitomycin C (MMC), and group 2: 10 patients underwent SST + MMC. The patients were followed-up over 2 years after surgery. Our outcome measures were: Postoperative intraocular pressure IOP, number of medications used, and postoperative complications. Results Twenty-four months postoperatively, the mean IOP was 13.78±2.05 mmHg in the SIGS group compared with preoperative IOP of 26.33±5.1 mmHg (P <0.001, paired t-test), and 14.38±4.56 mmHg in SST group compared with preoperative IOP of 30.13±7.51 mmHg (P <0.001, paired t-test). No significant differences in mean IOP between groups either preoperatively (P=0.15) or along follow-up (P=0.62 at last visit). The mean IOP drop from baseline was 12.56±5.00 mmHg (46.33±10.50%) in SIGS group and 15.75±8.22 mmHg (49.50±17.95%) in SST group (P=0.26). A significant decrease in the number of glaucoma medications was noted in the SIGSS group (P <0.001), in the SST group, the number decreased but was not statistically significant (P =0.120). Conclusion SIGS is comparable with SST in achieving long-term significant and maintained IOP reduction over up to 2 years, in addition to decreasing the number of antiglaucoma medications postoperatively. SIGS is recommended for surgical management of primary OAG as it has the advantage of being a faster, easier, less traumatic alternative to conventional SST with fewer complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"129 - 135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_95_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_95_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term outcome of stab incision glaucoma surgery versus trabeculectomy surgery in the management of primary open angle glaucoma
Purpose To assess the long-term outcome of Stab incision glaucoma surgery (SIGS) and compare it with subscleral trabeculectomy (SST) in the management of open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods Twenty eyes of 20 OAG patients were randomly assigned into group 1: 10 patients underwent SIGS + Mitomycin C (MMC), and group 2: 10 patients underwent SST + MMC. The patients were followed-up over 2 years after surgery. Our outcome measures were: Postoperative intraocular pressure IOP, number of medications used, and postoperative complications. Results Twenty-four months postoperatively, the mean IOP was 13.78±2.05 mmHg in the SIGS group compared with preoperative IOP of 26.33±5.1 mmHg (P <0.001, paired t-test), and 14.38±4.56 mmHg in SST group compared with preoperative IOP of 30.13±7.51 mmHg (P <0.001, paired t-test). No significant differences in mean IOP between groups either preoperatively (P=0.15) or along follow-up (P=0.62 at last visit). The mean IOP drop from baseline was 12.56±5.00 mmHg (46.33±10.50%) in SIGS group and 15.75±8.22 mmHg (49.50±17.95%) in SST group (P=0.26). A significant decrease in the number of glaucoma medications was noted in the SIGSS group (P <0.001), in the SST group, the number decreased but was not statistically significant (P =0.120). Conclusion SIGS is comparable with SST in achieving long-term significant and maintained IOP reduction over up to 2 years, in addition to decreasing the number of antiglaucoma medications postoperatively. SIGS is recommended for surgical management of primary OAG as it has the advantage of being a faster, easier, less traumatic alternative to conventional SST with fewer complications.