啊,兄弟,你是谁?

IF 0.4 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION Novum Testamentum Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1163/15685365-bja10035
Matthew Lambert
{"title":"啊,兄弟,你是谁?","authors":"Matthew Lambert","doi":"10.1163/15685365-bja10035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe two unnamed brothers at the close of 2 Cor 8 have occasioned the speculation of scholars both ancient and modern, all of whom have sought to answer the question: why did Paul not name them? After reviewing and problematizing the standard explanations for this anonymizing, the author here argues that Paul excludes their names in an effort to present them as guarantors of the collection. His failure to name them suggests that they stand at some distance from Paul, that they are not part of his circle, and so can provide “non-Pauline” oversight for the Jerusalem collection. The article concludes by suggesting that the success of Paul’s anonymization explains why Paul did not mention the collection in 2 Cor 10–13, his last known correspondence with the Corinthians.","PeriodicalId":19319,"journal":{"name":"Novum Testamentum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O Brother, Who Art Thou?\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Lambert\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15685365-bja10035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe two unnamed brothers at the close of 2 Cor 8 have occasioned the speculation of scholars both ancient and modern, all of whom have sought to answer the question: why did Paul not name them? After reviewing and problematizing the standard explanations for this anonymizing, the author here argues that Paul excludes their names in an effort to present them as guarantors of the collection. His failure to name them suggests that they stand at some distance from Paul, that they are not part of his circle, and so can provide “non-Pauline” oversight for the Jerusalem collection. The article concludes by suggesting that the success of Paul’s anonymization explains why Paul did not mention the collection in 2 Cor 10–13, his last known correspondence with the Corinthians.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Novum Testamentum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Novum Testamentum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685365-bja10035\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novum Testamentum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685365-bja10035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哥林多后书8章结尾的两位无名兄弟引起了古代和现代学者的猜测,他们都试图回答这个问题:为什么保罗没有给他们起名字?在回顾和质疑了这种匿名化的标准解释之后,作者在这里认为,保罗排除了他们的名字,是为了把他们作为收藏的担保人。他没有说出他们的名字,这表明他们与保罗有一定的距离,他们不属于他的圈子,因此可以为耶路撒冷的收藏提供“非保罗”的监督。这篇文章的结论是,保罗匿名化的成功解释了为什么保罗没有在哥林多后书10-13章提到他与哥林多信徒的最后通信。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O Brother, Who Art Thou?
The two unnamed brothers at the close of 2 Cor 8 have occasioned the speculation of scholars both ancient and modern, all of whom have sought to answer the question: why did Paul not name them? After reviewing and problematizing the standard explanations for this anonymizing, the author here argues that Paul excludes their names in an effort to present them as guarantors of the collection. His failure to name them suggests that they stand at some distance from Paul, that they are not part of his circle, and so can provide “non-Pauline” oversight for the Jerusalem collection. The article concludes by suggesting that the success of Paul’s anonymization explains why Paul did not mention the collection in 2 Cor 10–13, his last known correspondence with the Corinthians.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Novum Testamentum
Novum Testamentum RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Novum Testamentum is a leading international journal devoted to the study of the New Testament and related subjects. This includes text-critical, philological, and exegetical studies, and investigations which seek to situate early Christian texts (both canonical and non-canonical) and theology in the broader context of Jewish and Graeco-Roman history, culture, religion, and literature. ● For 50 years an unrivalled resource for the subject. ● Articles in English, French and German. ● Extensive Book Review section in each volume, introducing the reader to a large section of related titles.
期刊最新文献
Νόμος/νόμοι in the Septuagint and the Letter to the Hebrews Das Evangelium in einem rhetorischen Brief: Ein Kommentar zum 1. Thessalonicherbrief, written by Ulrich Mell Direct Dependence on Philo in the Epistle to the Hebrews Les démons étaient-ils vraiment le problème à Corinthe ? Reciprocity and High Resilience against Economic Fluctuations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1