英语学习者情绪和行为风险的普遍筛查

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 Social Sciences School Psychology Review Pub Date : 2021-11-04 DOI:10.1080/2372966X.2021.1984169
Imelda Murrieta, Katie Eklund
{"title":"英语学习者情绪和行为风险的普遍筛查","authors":"Imelda Murrieta, Katie Eklund","doi":"10.1080/2372966X.2021.1984169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Universal screening for emotional and behavioral risk (EBR) within K–12 schools can identify students who might benefit from interventions within Multitiered Systems of Support. As few studies have examined emotional and behavioral risk levels for English Language Learners, the present study used a brief behavior rating scale to examine EBR rates among elementary-aged ELLs and non-ELLs as rated by their classroom teachers. EBR was also examined according to students’ language classifications (i.e., Initial Fluent English Proficient [IFEP], Reclassified, ELL, or English-Only) and gender. Study results demonstrated no relationship between student’s ELL status or language classification and the identification of EBR. However, a significant relationship was found between gender and the identification of EBR among all students, where a higher number of males demonstrated EBR. In addition, students’ reading ability, age, and gender predicted whether ELL and non-ELL students would be identified as at-risk for emotional and behavioral concerns. Implications for practice and future research are discussed. Impact Summary The current study provides initial evidence demonstrating that student levels of English language proficiency does not differentially contribute to the identification of students with emotional and behavioral risk using a universal behavior screening measure in an elementary student sample. A logistic regression analysis determined students’ reading ability, age, and gender predicted whether ELL and non-ELL students would be identified as at-risk for emotional and behavioral concerns.","PeriodicalId":21555,"journal":{"name":"School Psychology Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"441 - 453"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Universal Screening to Detect Emotional and Behavioral Risk Among English Language Learners\",\"authors\":\"Imelda Murrieta, Katie Eklund\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2372966X.2021.1984169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Universal screening for emotional and behavioral risk (EBR) within K–12 schools can identify students who might benefit from interventions within Multitiered Systems of Support. As few studies have examined emotional and behavioral risk levels for English Language Learners, the present study used a brief behavior rating scale to examine EBR rates among elementary-aged ELLs and non-ELLs as rated by their classroom teachers. EBR was also examined according to students’ language classifications (i.e., Initial Fluent English Proficient [IFEP], Reclassified, ELL, or English-Only) and gender. Study results demonstrated no relationship between student’s ELL status or language classification and the identification of EBR. However, a significant relationship was found between gender and the identification of EBR among all students, where a higher number of males demonstrated EBR. In addition, students’ reading ability, age, and gender predicted whether ELL and non-ELL students would be identified as at-risk for emotional and behavioral concerns. Implications for practice and future research are discussed. Impact Summary The current study provides initial evidence demonstrating that student levels of English language proficiency does not differentially contribute to the identification of students with emotional and behavioral risk using a universal behavior screening measure in an elementary student sample. A logistic regression analysis determined students’ reading ability, age, and gender predicted whether ELL and non-ELL students would be identified as at-risk for emotional and behavioral concerns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"441 - 453\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.1984169\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.1984169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在K-12学校中进行情绪和行为风险(EBR)的普遍筛查可以识别可能从多层支持系统干预中受益的学生。由于很少有研究考察英语学习者的情绪和行为风险水平,本研究使用了一个简短的行为评定量表来考察小学年龄的英语学习者和非英语学习者的EBR率,并由他们的课堂老师评定。EBR也根据学生的语言分类(即初始流利英语精通[IFEP],重新分类,ELL或仅英语)和性别进行检查。研究结果表明,学生的ELL状态或语言分类与EBR的识别没有关系。然而,在所有学生中,性别与EBR的认同之间存在显著的关系,其中男性表现出更多的EBR。此外,学生的阅读能力、年龄和性别预测了ELL和非ELL学生是否会被认为存在情绪和行为问题的风险。讨论了对实践和未来研究的启示。目前的研究提供了初步的证据,表明在小学生样本中,使用通用行为筛查措施,学生的英语语言熟练程度对识别有情绪和行为风险的学生没有差异。逻辑回归分析确定了学生的阅读能力、年龄和性别预测了ELL和非ELL学生是否会被确定为情感和行为问题的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Universal Screening to Detect Emotional and Behavioral Risk Among English Language Learners
Abstract Universal screening for emotional and behavioral risk (EBR) within K–12 schools can identify students who might benefit from interventions within Multitiered Systems of Support. As few studies have examined emotional and behavioral risk levels for English Language Learners, the present study used a brief behavior rating scale to examine EBR rates among elementary-aged ELLs and non-ELLs as rated by their classroom teachers. EBR was also examined according to students’ language classifications (i.e., Initial Fluent English Proficient [IFEP], Reclassified, ELL, or English-Only) and gender. Study results demonstrated no relationship between student’s ELL status or language classification and the identification of EBR. However, a significant relationship was found between gender and the identification of EBR among all students, where a higher number of males demonstrated EBR. In addition, students’ reading ability, age, and gender predicted whether ELL and non-ELL students would be identified as at-risk for emotional and behavioral concerns. Implications for practice and future research are discussed. Impact Summary The current study provides initial evidence demonstrating that student levels of English language proficiency does not differentially contribute to the identification of students with emotional and behavioral risk using a universal behavior screening measure in an elementary student sample. A logistic regression analysis determined students’ reading ability, age, and gender predicted whether ELL and non-ELL students would be identified as at-risk for emotional and behavioral concerns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
School Psychology Review
School Psychology Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: School Psychology Review (SPR) is a refereed journal published quarterly by NASP. Its primary purpose is to provide a means for communicating scholarly advances in research, training, and practice related to psychology and education, and specifically to school psychology. Of particular interest are articles presenting original, data-based research that can contribute to the development of innovative intervention and prevention strategies and the evaluation of these approaches. SPR presents important conceptual developments and empirical findings from a wide range of disciplines (e.g., educational, child clinical, pediatric, community.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Interaction Between Text Characteristics, Order and Time of Assessment on Bilingual Student Reading Efficiency in Spanish and in English Wellness as an Ethical Mandate: Examining the Mental Health, Stress, and Self-Care Practices of School Psychology Graduate Students Recruitment and Retention Strategies to Diversify School Psychology Graduate Programs: A Systematic Review The Role of Writing Enablers on Writing Proficiency among Hispanic Students Promoting Positive School Climate Among Newcomer Immigrant Adolescents: A Qualitative Exploration of Perceptions and Recommendations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1