Matthew C. Ledwith, Brandon J. Hufstetler, Mark A. Gallagher
{"title":"不确定性条件下平衡目标成就的随机抢先目标规划","authors":"Matthew C. Ledwith, Brandon J. Hufstetler, Mark A. Gallagher","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Structured decision-making in the presence of conflicting goals is difficult, and even more so when accounting for uncertainties in the goals or constraints. In this article, we propose a new approach to multi-criteria decision-making that extends the deterministic preemptive goal programming approach to account for such uncertainties. The uncertainties may be characterized in various ways including a Bayesian network or extensive Monte Carlo multi-variate output. We contend the proposed stochastic preemptive goal programming approach is particularly applicable when better goal achievement increases uncertainty or induces risk to other goals. Resulting solutions tend to be a balance of the goals' achievements and robust to minor changes to the goals or constraints. We demonstrate the approach using three illustrative examples: a univariate example, a bivariate example, and a stock portfolio optimization example along with an application to determine military requests for absence. Our preliminary results suggest that a stochastic preemptive goal programming approach represents an effective means of analysing multi-criteria decision-making problems under uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":45876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","volume":"28 1-2","pages":"85-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mcda.1734","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stochastic preemptive goal programming to balance goal achievements under uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"Matthew C. Ledwith, Brandon J. Hufstetler, Mark A. Gallagher\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mcda.1734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Structured decision-making in the presence of conflicting goals is difficult, and even more so when accounting for uncertainties in the goals or constraints. In this article, we propose a new approach to multi-criteria decision-making that extends the deterministic preemptive goal programming approach to account for such uncertainties. The uncertainties may be characterized in various ways including a Bayesian network or extensive Monte Carlo multi-variate output. We contend the proposed stochastic preemptive goal programming approach is particularly applicable when better goal achievement increases uncertainty or induces risk to other goals. Resulting solutions tend to be a balance of the goals' achievements and robust to minor changes to the goals or constraints. We demonstrate the approach using three illustrative examples: a univariate example, a bivariate example, and a stock portfolio optimization example along with an application to determine military requests for absence. Our preliminary results suggest that a stochastic preemptive goal programming approach represents an effective means of analysing multi-criteria decision-making problems under uncertainty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis\",\"volume\":\"28 1-2\",\"pages\":\"85-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mcda.1734\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcda.1734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcda.1734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stochastic preemptive goal programming to balance goal achievements under uncertainty
Structured decision-making in the presence of conflicting goals is difficult, and even more so when accounting for uncertainties in the goals or constraints. In this article, we propose a new approach to multi-criteria decision-making that extends the deterministic preemptive goal programming approach to account for such uncertainties. The uncertainties may be characterized in various ways including a Bayesian network or extensive Monte Carlo multi-variate output. We contend the proposed stochastic preemptive goal programming approach is particularly applicable when better goal achievement increases uncertainty or induces risk to other goals. Resulting solutions tend to be a balance of the goals' achievements and robust to minor changes to the goals or constraints. We demonstrate the approach using three illustrative examples: a univariate example, a bivariate example, and a stock portfolio optimization example along with an application to determine military requests for absence. Our preliminary results suggest that a stochastic preemptive goal programming approach represents an effective means of analysing multi-criteria decision-making problems under uncertainty.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis was launched in 1992, and from the outset has aimed to be the repository of choice for papers covering all aspects of MCDA/MCDM. The journal provides an international forum for the presentation and discussion of all aspects of research, application and evaluation of multi-criteria decision analysis, and publishes material from a variety of disciplines and all schools of thought. Papers addressing mathematical, theoretical, and behavioural aspects are welcome, as are case studies, applications and evaluation of techniques and methodologies.