飞行员的抑郁和焦虑:美国航空使用SSRI的定性研究以及与ICAO国家相比FAA标准和实践的评估

Q3 Social Sciences Collegiate Aviation Review Pub Date : 2019-07-18 DOI:10.22488/OKSTATE.19.100217
J. Durham, T. Bliss
{"title":"飞行员的抑郁和焦虑:美国航空使用SSRI的定性研究以及与ICAO国家相比FAA标准和实践的评估","authors":"J. Durham, T. Bliss","doi":"10.22488/OKSTATE.19.100217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Before 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) did not allow airmen to exercise the privileges of pilot in command (PIC) of an aircraft or obtain a medical certificate if one had been diagnosed with anxiety, depression, and/or taking an SSRI medication. Since 2010, the FAA relaxed its views and certification standards. However, this is not an issue unique to the U.S. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and other ICAO States began evaluating airmen suffering from anxiety, depression, and/or taking an SSRI medication in early 2000. ICAO and most ICAO States have identified the need for further research regarding mood disorders and airmen. In addition, ICAO has issued guidance regarding certification standards, though each ICAO State has the authority to set its own standards. While the FAA and the other ICAO States have accepted mood disorders in aviation as a reality, additional work is needed to unify standards within the international aviation community. ICAO States with more stringent standards, may force airmen to seek alternative treatment options and not disclose crucial medical information or seek appropriate treatment options in fear of reprisal. In 2018, a qualitative study was conducted that evaluated FAA medical certification standards for airmen suffering from mood disorders and compared them against medical certification standards of other ICAO State agencies and ICAO recommended practices. This qualitative study also evaluated U.S. pilot perceptions of the certification process, as well as views from a non-aviation medical physician using interviews and survey questionnaires. Responses were compared to current practices and evaluated. Findings from this study concluded that while FAA certification standards may be comparable to other ICAO States, general views regarding agency acceptance of mental health disorders can vary widely across State agencies.","PeriodicalId":39089,"journal":{"name":"Collegiate Aviation Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Depression and Anxiety in Pilots: A Qualitative Study of SSRI Usage in U.S. Aviation and Evaluation of FAA Standards and Practices Compared to ICAO States\",\"authors\":\"J. Durham, T. Bliss\",\"doi\":\"10.22488/OKSTATE.19.100217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Before 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) did not allow airmen to exercise the privileges of pilot in command (PIC) of an aircraft or obtain a medical certificate if one had been diagnosed with anxiety, depression, and/or taking an SSRI medication. Since 2010, the FAA relaxed its views and certification standards. However, this is not an issue unique to the U.S. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and other ICAO States began evaluating airmen suffering from anxiety, depression, and/or taking an SSRI medication in early 2000. ICAO and most ICAO States have identified the need for further research regarding mood disorders and airmen. In addition, ICAO has issued guidance regarding certification standards, though each ICAO State has the authority to set its own standards. While the FAA and the other ICAO States have accepted mood disorders in aviation as a reality, additional work is needed to unify standards within the international aviation community. ICAO States with more stringent standards, may force airmen to seek alternative treatment options and not disclose crucial medical information or seek appropriate treatment options in fear of reprisal. In 2018, a qualitative study was conducted that evaluated FAA medical certification standards for airmen suffering from mood disorders and compared them against medical certification standards of other ICAO State agencies and ICAO recommended practices. This qualitative study also evaluated U.S. pilot perceptions of the certification process, as well as views from a non-aviation medical physician using interviews and survey questionnaires. Responses were compared to current practices and evaluated. Findings from this study concluded that while FAA certification standards may be comparable to other ICAO States, general views regarding agency acceptance of mental health disorders can vary widely across State agencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collegiate Aviation Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collegiate Aviation Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22488/OKSTATE.19.100217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegiate Aviation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22488/OKSTATE.19.100217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在2010年之前,美国联邦航空管理局(FAA)不允许飞行员行使飞机机长的特权,也不允许飞行员在被诊断为焦虑、抑郁和/或服用SSRI药物的情况下获得医疗证书。自2010年以来,美国联邦航空管理局放宽了其观点和认证标准。然而,这并不是美国独有的问题。国际民用航空组织(ICAO)和其他ICAO国家于2000年初开始评估患有焦虑、抑郁和/或服用SSRI药物的飞行员。国际民航组织和大多数国际民航组织国家已经确定需要对情绪障碍和飞行员进行进一步研究。此外,国际民航组织发布了关于认证标准的指导意见,尽管国际民航组织每个国家都有权制定自己的标准。虽然美国联邦航空管理局和国际民航组织其他国家已经接受了航空业情绪障碍的现实,但还需要做更多的工作来统一国际航空界的标准。国际民航组织标准更严格的国家可能会迫使飞行员寻求替代治疗方案,不得披露关键的医疗信息,也不得因害怕报复而寻求适当的治疗方案。2018年,进行了一项定性研究,评估了美国联邦航空局对患有情绪障碍的飞行员的医疗认证标准,并将其与国际民航组织其他国家机构的医学认证标准和国际民航组织推荐的做法进行了比较。这项定性研究还通过访谈和调查问卷评估了美国飞行员对认证过程的看法,以及非航空医生的看法。将答复与现行做法进行比较并进行评估。这项研究的结论是,虽然美国联邦航空管理局的认证标准可能与国际民航组织的其他国家相当,但各国机构对机构接受精神健康障碍的普遍看法可能大相径庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Depression and Anxiety in Pilots: A Qualitative Study of SSRI Usage in U.S. Aviation and Evaluation of FAA Standards and Practices Compared to ICAO States
Before 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) did not allow airmen to exercise the privileges of pilot in command (PIC) of an aircraft or obtain a medical certificate if one had been diagnosed with anxiety, depression, and/or taking an SSRI medication. Since 2010, the FAA relaxed its views and certification standards. However, this is not an issue unique to the U.S. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and other ICAO States began evaluating airmen suffering from anxiety, depression, and/or taking an SSRI medication in early 2000. ICAO and most ICAO States have identified the need for further research regarding mood disorders and airmen. In addition, ICAO has issued guidance regarding certification standards, though each ICAO State has the authority to set its own standards. While the FAA and the other ICAO States have accepted mood disorders in aviation as a reality, additional work is needed to unify standards within the international aviation community. ICAO States with more stringent standards, may force airmen to seek alternative treatment options and not disclose crucial medical information or seek appropriate treatment options in fear of reprisal. In 2018, a qualitative study was conducted that evaluated FAA medical certification standards for airmen suffering from mood disorders and compared them against medical certification standards of other ICAO State agencies and ICAO recommended practices. This qualitative study also evaluated U.S. pilot perceptions of the certification process, as well as views from a non-aviation medical physician using interviews and survey questionnaires. Responses were compared to current practices and evaluated. Findings from this study concluded that while FAA certification standards may be comparable to other ICAO States, general views regarding agency acceptance of mental health disorders can vary widely across State agencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Collegiate Aviation Review
Collegiate Aviation Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do Different Learning Style Inventories Report Similar Findings Among Pilots? Airspace Ownership Controversies in the United States: A Concise History A Bibliographical Analysis of Pragmatic Strategies Responding to the Pandemic Crisis in Aviation Identification, Evaluation, and Causal Factor Determination of Maintenance Errors Common to Major U.S. Certificated Air Carriers Exploring the State of SMS Implementation at Airports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1