“一点安全毯”:新冠肺炎租房者体验——时代驱逐禁令

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Social Service Review Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-14 DOI:10.1086/725320
Danya E Keene, Whitney Denary, Annie Harper, Anna Kapolka, Emily A Benfer, Peter Hepburn
{"title":"“一点安全毯”:新冠肺炎租房者体验——时代驱逐禁令","authors":"Danya E Keene, Whitney Denary, Annie Harper, Anna Kapolka, Emily A Benfer, Peter Hepburn","doi":"10.1086/725320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Policy makers at the federal, state, and local levels responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with a broad array of policies that were intended to prevent housing instability among renters. Eviction moratoriums were an important part of this policy landscape. Recent evidence indicates that these moratoriums were effective in reducing eviction-filing rates, but many questions remain about the impacts of these policies. Drawing on qualitative interviews (<i>N</i> = 60) with renters in three states (Connecticut, Florida, and Ohio) who had experienced eviction or eviction risk during the pandemic, we examine how renters interpreted, experienced, and navigated the moratoriums; how moratoriums shaped their well-being and housing security; how racism may have shaped policy effects; and how these experiences differed across a varied policy landscape. Our findings demonstrate how moratoriums supported renters and how they fell short, offering important lessons for future eviction-prevention and civil-legal policy making.</p>","PeriodicalId":47665,"journal":{"name":"Social Service Review","volume":"97 1","pages":"423-455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"A Little Bit of a Security Blanket\\\": Renter Experiences with COVID-19-Era Eviction Moratoriums.\",\"authors\":\"Danya E Keene, Whitney Denary, Annie Harper, Anna Kapolka, Emily A Benfer, Peter Hepburn\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/725320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Policy makers at the federal, state, and local levels responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with a broad array of policies that were intended to prevent housing instability among renters. Eviction moratoriums were an important part of this policy landscape. Recent evidence indicates that these moratoriums were effective in reducing eviction-filing rates, but many questions remain about the impacts of these policies. Drawing on qualitative interviews (<i>N</i> = 60) with renters in three states (Connecticut, Florida, and Ohio) who had experienced eviction or eviction risk during the pandemic, we examine how renters interpreted, experienced, and navigated the moratoriums; how moratoriums shaped their well-being and housing security; how racism may have shaped policy effects; and how these experiences differed across a varied policy landscape. Our findings demonstrate how moratoriums supported renters and how they fell short, offering important lessons for future eviction-prevention and civil-legal policy making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Service Review\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"423-455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090144/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Service Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/725320\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Service Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

联邦、州和地方各级的政策制定者通过一系列旨在防止租房者住房不稳定的政策来应对新冠肺炎疫情。暂缓驱逐是这一政策格局的重要组成部分。最近的证据表明,这些暂停措施有效地降低了驱逐申请率,但这些政策的影响仍然存在许多问题。根据对三个州(康涅狄格州、佛罗里达州和俄亥俄州)在疫情期间经历过被驱逐或被驱逐风险的租房者的定性采访(N=60),我们研究了租房者是如何理解、经历和度过暂停期的;暂停是如何影响他们的福祉和住房保障的;种族主义如何影响政策效果;以及在不同的政策环境中,这些经历有何不同。我们的研究结果表明,暂停令是如何支持租房者的,以及他们是如何功亏一篑的,为未来的驱逐预防和民事法律政策制定提供了重要的教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"A Little Bit of a Security Blanket": Renter Experiences with COVID-19-Era Eviction Moratoriums.

Policy makers at the federal, state, and local levels responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with a broad array of policies that were intended to prevent housing instability among renters. Eviction moratoriums were an important part of this policy landscape. Recent evidence indicates that these moratoriums were effective in reducing eviction-filing rates, but many questions remain about the impacts of these policies. Drawing on qualitative interviews (N = 60) with renters in three states (Connecticut, Florida, and Ohio) who had experienced eviction or eviction risk during the pandemic, we examine how renters interpreted, experienced, and navigated the moratoriums; how moratoriums shaped their well-being and housing security; how racism may have shaped policy effects; and how these experiences differed across a varied policy landscape. Our findings demonstrate how moratoriums supported renters and how they fell short, offering important lessons for future eviction-prevention and civil-legal policy making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Service Review
Social Service Review SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Founded in 1927, Social Service Review is devoted to the publication of thought-provoking, original research on social welfare policy, organization, and practice. Articles in the Review analyze issues from the points of view of various disciplines, theories, and methodological traditions, view critical problems in context, and carefully consider long-range solutions. The Review features balanced, scholarly contributions from social work and social welfare scholars, as well as from members of the various allied disciplines engaged in research on human behavior, social systems, history, public policy, and social services.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of brain activation and functional outcomes between physical and virtual reality box and block test: a case study. Economic Outcomes of Shared Placement among Divorced Mothers in Wisconsin Unusual Branchial Cleft Cyst at Parapharyngeal Space: Case Report and a Review of Literature. Social Work and the Platform Economy: A Labor Process Theory Analysis Of the State, against the State: Public Defenders, Street-Level Bureaucracy, and Discretion in Criminal Court
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1