对被收养人使用直接面向消费者的基因检测的伦理考虑

IF 0.9 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Adoption Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10926755.2020.1833391
T. May, S. Fullerton
{"title":"对被收养人使用直接面向消费者的基因检测的伦理考虑","authors":"T. May, S. Fullerton","doi":"10.1080/10926755.2020.1833391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The use of DTC genetic testing to identify health risks is increasingly popular. This is particularly the case for adopted persons, who often lack access to family health history information and who may see genetic testing as the best (and only) way to identify potential inherited disease risks. However, the development of genetic testing to fill gaps in family health history information for adopted persons has been hindered by several challenges including ethical concerns surrounding appropriate uses of biotechnology and its application to medicine and public health. Here, we will approach these concerns in the context of the “Four Principles Approach” articulated by Beauchamp and Childress. Through this approach, it is our aim to illustrate the need for careful consideration of often neglected risks and benefits before adoptees make the decision to engage genetic testing.","PeriodicalId":45383,"journal":{"name":"Adoption Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10926755.2020.1833391","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical Considerations in the Use of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing for Adopted Persons\",\"authors\":\"T. May, S. Fullerton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10926755.2020.1833391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The use of DTC genetic testing to identify health risks is increasingly popular. This is particularly the case for adopted persons, who often lack access to family health history information and who may see genetic testing as the best (and only) way to identify potential inherited disease risks. However, the development of genetic testing to fill gaps in family health history information for adopted persons has been hindered by several challenges including ethical concerns surrounding appropriate uses of biotechnology and its application to medicine and public health. Here, we will approach these concerns in the context of the “Four Principles Approach” articulated by Beauchamp and Childress. Through this approach, it is our aim to illustrate the need for careful consideration of often neglected risks and benefits before adoptees make the decision to engage genetic testing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adoption Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10926755.2020.1833391\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adoption Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2020.1833391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2020.1833391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要使用DTC基因检测来识别健康风险越来越受欢迎。对于被收养的人来说尤其如此,他们往往无法获得家族健康史信息,他们可能认为基因检测是识别潜在遗传疾病风险的最佳(也是唯一)方式。然而,为填补被收养人家庭健康史信息的空白而进行的基因检测的发展受到了一些挑战的阻碍,包括对适当使用生物技术及其在医学和公共卫生中的应用的伦理问题。在这里,我们将在Beauchamp和Childress阐述的“四原则方法”的背景下处理这些问题。通过这种方法,我们的目的是说明在被收养人决定进行基因检测之前,需要仔细考虑经常被忽视的风险和好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethical Considerations in the Use of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing for Adopted Persons
Abstract The use of DTC genetic testing to identify health risks is increasingly popular. This is particularly the case for adopted persons, who often lack access to family health history information and who may see genetic testing as the best (and only) way to identify potential inherited disease risks. However, the development of genetic testing to fill gaps in family health history information for adopted persons has been hindered by several challenges including ethical concerns surrounding appropriate uses of biotechnology and its application to medicine and public health. Here, we will approach these concerns in the context of the “Four Principles Approach” articulated by Beauchamp and Childress. Through this approach, it is our aim to illustrate the need for careful consideration of often neglected risks and benefits before adoptees make the decision to engage genetic testing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Adoption Quarterly
Adoption Quarterly SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Adoption Quarterly is an unparalleled forum for examining the issues of child care, of adoption as viewed from a lifespan perspective, and of the psychological and social meanings of the word "family." This international, multidisciplinary journal features conceptual and empirical work, commentaries, and book reviews from the fields of the social sciences, humanities, biological sciences, law, and social policy. In addition to examining ethical, biological, financial, social and psychological adoption issues, Adoption Quarterly addresses continuity in adoption issues that are important to both practitioners and researchers, such as: negotiation of birth and adoptive family contact.
期刊最新文献
Social Competence, School Engagement, and School Performance Among US Children Adopted Through Private Domestic, International, and Foster Care Adoption A Lonely Position. Misrecognition and Belonging Among International Adoptees in Norway Securely Ever After: Attachment, Trust, and Commitment in Married U.S. Adult Adoptees Beyond Telling: A Phenomenology of Adoptive Mothers’ Adoption Communication Openness with Early Adolescents Adopted adults’ Motivation, Decision Making, and Experience of Searching for Birth Family: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography of the Qualitative Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1