在爪哇婚姻禁令的传统中建立谈判模式

Miftahul Huda
{"title":"在爪哇婚姻禁令的传统中建立谈判模式","authors":"Miftahul Huda","doi":"10.21274/EPIS.2017.12.2.381-409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks to explore the model of negotiating the five families of Nahdliyyin-Muhammadiyah to the Ponorogo community over the traditional dispute over the prohibitions of Javanese marriage. The traditions of the Javanese marriage that is “weton”, “ngalon-ngulon”, “Golan-Mirah”, marriage of “lusan” and “madep-ngarep” marriage. Excavation model of the negotiation result is divided into three models. First, the model of negotiating within the frame of kalam (theology) and adat (tradition) connections the nappears to be incompatibility and inconsistency between the two. This is due to the emergence of different assumptions due to syirik (belief in more than of God) stereotype, because it is more holding the tradition than the existing of religious rules. Second, the model of negotiating within the framework of the Jurisprudence and adat connections that gave birth to the relationship of proximity and flexibility in responding to Javanese marriage customs or traditions so that it can be an alternative pattern of settlement. Third, the model negotiates within the framework of wisdom and diversity of customs/traditions. In the category of this meaning, the problem of the tradition of the prohibitions on Javanese marriage can be resolved by returning to the wisdom and diversity of tradition. Let the tradition solve itself. It seems that with this category the negotiation process goes fluently.","PeriodicalId":31250,"journal":{"name":"Episteme Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman","volume":"12 1","pages":"381-409"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MEMBANGUN MODEL BERNEGOSIASI DALAM TRADISI LARANGAN-LARANGAN PERKAWINAN JAWA\",\"authors\":\"Miftahul Huda\",\"doi\":\"10.21274/EPIS.2017.12.2.381-409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper seeks to explore the model of negotiating the five families of Nahdliyyin-Muhammadiyah to the Ponorogo community over the traditional dispute over the prohibitions of Javanese marriage. The traditions of the Javanese marriage that is “weton”, “ngalon-ngulon”, “Golan-Mirah”, marriage of “lusan” and “madep-ngarep” marriage. Excavation model of the negotiation result is divided into three models. First, the model of negotiating within the frame of kalam (theology) and adat (tradition) connections the nappears to be incompatibility and inconsistency between the two. This is due to the emergence of different assumptions due to syirik (belief in more than of God) stereotype, because it is more holding the tradition than the existing of religious rules. Second, the model of negotiating within the framework of the Jurisprudence and adat connections that gave birth to the relationship of proximity and flexibility in responding to Javanese marriage customs or traditions so that it can be an alternative pattern of settlement. Third, the model negotiates within the framework of wisdom and diversity of customs/traditions. In the category of this meaning, the problem of the tradition of the prohibitions on Javanese marriage can be resolved by returning to the wisdom and diversity of tradition. Let the tradition solve itself. It seems that with this category the negotiation process goes fluently.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Episteme Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"381-409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Episteme Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21274/EPIS.2017.12.2.381-409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Episteme Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21274/EPIS.2017.12.2.381-409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文旨在探讨Nahdliyyin-Muhammadiyah的五个家庭与Ponorogo社区就禁止爪哇婚姻的传统纠纷进行谈判的模式。爪哇的传统婚姻是“weton”,“ngalon-ngulon”,“Golan-Mirah”,“lusan”和“madeep -ngarep”婚姻。协商结果的挖掘模型分为三个模型。首先,在卡拉姆(神学)和阿达特(传统)框架内的谈判模式,两者之间出现了不相容和不一致。这是由于syirik(信仰不止一个上帝)的刻板印象产生了不同的假设,因为它比现有的宗教规则更坚持传统。其次,在法理学框架内的谈判模式和适应爪哇婚姻习俗或传统的联系产生了邻近和灵活的关系,使其成为另一种解决模式。第三,该模式在智慧和习俗/传统多样性的框架内进行谈判。在这个意义的范畴内,禁止爪哇婚姻的传统问题可以通过回归传统的智慧和多样性来解决。让传统自行解决吧。似乎有了这个类别,谈判过程进行得很顺利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MEMBANGUN MODEL BERNEGOSIASI DALAM TRADISI LARANGAN-LARANGAN PERKAWINAN JAWA
This paper seeks to explore the model of negotiating the five families of Nahdliyyin-Muhammadiyah to the Ponorogo community over the traditional dispute over the prohibitions of Javanese marriage. The traditions of the Javanese marriage that is “weton”, “ngalon-ngulon”, “Golan-Mirah”, marriage of “lusan” and “madep-ngarep” marriage. Excavation model of the negotiation result is divided into three models. First, the model of negotiating within the frame of kalam (theology) and adat (tradition) connections the nappears to be incompatibility and inconsistency between the two. This is due to the emergence of different assumptions due to syirik (belief in more than of God) stereotype, because it is more holding the tradition than the existing of religious rules. Second, the model of negotiating within the framework of the Jurisprudence and adat connections that gave birth to the relationship of proximity and flexibility in responding to Javanese marriage customs or traditions so that it can be an alternative pattern of settlement. Third, the model negotiates within the framework of wisdom and diversity of customs/traditions. In the category of this meaning, the problem of the tradition of the prohibitions on Javanese marriage can be resolved by returning to the wisdom and diversity of tradition. Let the tradition solve itself. It seems that with this category the negotiation process goes fluently.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
SHIFTING DAKWAH METHODS TO MATCH MEDIA TECHNOLOGY TRANSFORMATION WHO ARE THE BREADWINNERS? THE POLITICS OF A LOCAL SUFISM IN CONTEMPORARY INDONESIA RAPPROCHEMENT BETWEEN SUNNISM AND SHIISM IN INDONESIA: MUSLIM YOUTH AND PHILANTROPHIC ACTIVISM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1