未来是苏联吗?苏联-2061和乌托邦的现实

Q2 Arts and Humanities Praktyka Teoretyczna Pub Date : 2021-10-15 DOI:10.14746/prt.2021.3.10
Roman Privalov
{"title":"未来是苏联吗?苏联-2061和乌托邦的现实","authors":"Roman Privalov","doi":"10.14746/prt.2021.3.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"USSR-2061 is a Russian futuristic online project that imagines a new USSR a century after Gagarin’s journey into space. This article connects the project to Soviet space utopianism and the nostalgia that followed it, while seeing USSR-2061 and its artefacts in the light of utopian studies. In particular, the project’s hesitation with regard to utopianism and its thirst for realism are situated within a classical utopian problem of how to achieve real, not only imaginary, transformations. Such realism generally coincides with Levitas’ (2013) framework of utopia as a method, and, as the analysis shows, it hinders the construction of “an image of a future” at which the project aims. Instead, the resulting narratives and visions commonly overlap with the official Russian political discourse that makes use of Soviet nostalgia, or fall into retrofuturistic replications of commonly satirized Soviet discourses. However, a different way of constructing utopia is also present in USSR-2061, even if it is never highlighted. To make utopia possible in anti-utopian times, one might need to rethink its place of possibility or topos. Theoretically, such an alternative is presented in connection to Latour’s (2017) Terrestrial, a place with agency that in utopian terms presupposes a transgression of the boundary between the real and imaginary, the political and cultural. In the same line, the paper argues that USSR-2061 might attempt the construction of a new utopia through rethinking space. This might be fostered through the inclusion of cosmist ideas such as those of Vladimir Vernadsky and Alexander Chizhevsky, whose intersections with Latourian framework have previously been observed.","PeriodicalId":36093,"journal":{"name":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the Future Soviet? USSR-2061 and the Reality of Utopia\",\"authors\":\"Roman Privalov\",\"doi\":\"10.14746/prt.2021.3.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"USSR-2061 is a Russian futuristic online project that imagines a new USSR a century after Gagarin’s journey into space. This article connects the project to Soviet space utopianism and the nostalgia that followed it, while seeing USSR-2061 and its artefacts in the light of utopian studies. In particular, the project’s hesitation with regard to utopianism and its thirst for realism are situated within a classical utopian problem of how to achieve real, not only imaginary, transformations. Such realism generally coincides with Levitas’ (2013) framework of utopia as a method, and, as the analysis shows, it hinders the construction of “an image of a future” at which the project aims. Instead, the resulting narratives and visions commonly overlap with the official Russian political discourse that makes use of Soviet nostalgia, or fall into retrofuturistic replications of commonly satirized Soviet discourses. However, a different way of constructing utopia is also present in USSR-2061, even if it is never highlighted. To make utopia possible in anti-utopian times, one might need to rethink its place of possibility or topos. Theoretically, such an alternative is presented in connection to Latour’s (2017) Terrestrial, a place with agency that in utopian terms presupposes a transgression of the boundary between the real and imaginary, the political and cultural. In the same line, the paper argues that USSR-2061 might attempt the construction of a new utopia through rethinking space. This might be fostered through the inclusion of cosmist ideas such as those of Vladimir Vernadsky and Alexander Chizhevsky, whose intersections with Latourian framework have previously been observed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Praktyka Teoretyczna\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Praktyka Teoretyczna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14746/prt.2021.3.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/prt.2021.3.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

USSR-2061是一个俄罗斯未来主义在线项目,设想在加加林太空之旅一个世纪后建立一个新的苏联。本文将该项目与苏联的太空乌托邦主义和随之而来的怀旧联系起来,同时从乌托邦研究的角度来看USSR-2061及其人工制品。特别是,该项目对乌托邦主义的犹豫和对现实主义的渴望,都属于如何实现真实而不仅仅是想象的转变的经典乌托邦问题。这种现实主义通常与Levitas(2013)关于乌托邦作为一种方法的框架相吻合,正如分析所示,它阻碍了该项目所追求的“未来形象”的构建。相反,由此产生的叙事和愿景通常与利用苏联怀旧情绪的俄罗斯官方政治话语重叠,或者落入对通常被讽刺的苏联话语的复古复制。然而,USSR-2061中也出现了一种不同的乌托邦构建方式,即使它从未被强调过。为了使乌托邦在反乌托邦时代成为可能,人们可能需要重新思考它的可能性或拓扑。从理论上讲,这样一种选择是与拉图尔(2017)的《大地》(Terrestrial)有关的,这是一个有代理权的地方,用乌托邦的术语来说,它预设了对真实与想象、政治与文化之间界限的超越。同样,论文认为,USSR-2061可能试图通过重新思考空间来构建一个新的乌托邦。这可能是通过纳入Vladimir Vernadsky和Alexander Chizhevsky等化妆师的思想来促进的,他们与拉图里框架的交叉点以前已经被观察到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is the Future Soviet? USSR-2061 and the Reality of Utopia
USSR-2061 is a Russian futuristic online project that imagines a new USSR a century after Gagarin’s journey into space. This article connects the project to Soviet space utopianism and the nostalgia that followed it, while seeing USSR-2061 and its artefacts in the light of utopian studies. In particular, the project’s hesitation with regard to utopianism and its thirst for realism are situated within a classical utopian problem of how to achieve real, not only imaginary, transformations. Such realism generally coincides with Levitas’ (2013) framework of utopia as a method, and, as the analysis shows, it hinders the construction of “an image of a future” at which the project aims. Instead, the resulting narratives and visions commonly overlap with the official Russian political discourse that makes use of Soviet nostalgia, or fall into retrofuturistic replications of commonly satirized Soviet discourses. However, a different way of constructing utopia is also present in USSR-2061, even if it is never highlighted. To make utopia possible in anti-utopian times, one might need to rethink its place of possibility or topos. Theoretically, such an alternative is presented in connection to Latour’s (2017) Terrestrial, a place with agency that in utopian terms presupposes a transgression of the boundary between the real and imaginary, the political and cultural. In the same line, the paper argues that USSR-2061 might attempt the construction of a new utopia through rethinking space. This might be fostered through the inclusion of cosmist ideas such as those of Vladimir Vernadsky and Alexander Chizhevsky, whose intersections with Latourian framework have previously been observed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Praktyka Teoretyczna
Praktyka Teoretyczna Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
„Na hałdach rosną ludzie”: literacka historia pogórniczych środowisk sprzymierzeńczych The Doomsday Economy: Colonial Violence, Environmental Catastrophe, and Burning Tires in Palestine Dialektyka natury i społeczeństwa przeciwko monizmowi. Esej recenzyjny z „Marx in the Anthropocene” Kohei Saita (2023, Cambridge University Press) Francuski atom a kapitał symboliczny Bourdieu Rewolucyjne siły reprodukcji? Esej recenzyjny wokół książki Stefanii Barci, „Forces of Reproduction: Notes for a Counter-Hegemonic Anthropocene” (2020, Cambridge University Press)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1